Suppr超能文献

并发多服务覆盖对创伤护理质量和安全的影响。

The Impact of Concurrent Multi-Service Coverage on Quality and Safety in Trauma Care.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:463-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At many trauma centers in the United States, one acute care surgeon is responsible for overnight coverage of both the emergency general surgery (EGS) and trauma services. The impact of this scheduling phenomenon on the quality and safety of trauma care has not been studied.

METHODS

Overnight (12:00 AM to 7:00 AM) trauma admissions to an academic Level 1 trauma center from 2013-2015 were studied after the institution adopted this scheduling phenomenon. Admissions were divided into two groups based on whether the admitting surgeon covered only the trauma service, or both the trauma and EGS services ("multi-service coverage"). Four major outcomes (e.g., mortality and complications), six quality metrics (e.g., time to first OR visit and unplanned transfers to the ICU), and procedural utilization patterns were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1046 admissions were included. There were no differences in any major outcomes between the two exposure groups, including any National Trauma Data Bank-defined complication (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.5, P= 0.5). Quality metrics dependent on the admitting surgeon remained unchanged, including attending presence at the highest-level trauma activations within 15 min of arrival (93% versus 86%, P= 0.07) and time to urgent operative intervention (68 min versus 82 min, P= 0.9). There were no differences in the number of laboratory and imaging studies (4.1 versus 4.1, P= 0.9) or bedside interventions (1.8 versus 2.1, P= 0.4) performed per patient by the admitting surgeon. Multivariate logistic regression did not identify multi-service coverage as an independent risk factor for adverse patient outcomes or quality metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma admissions under a surgeon covering multiple services simultaneously had similar outcomes, quality metrics, and procedural utilization patterns compared to trauma admissions under surgeons covering only the trauma service. Despite concerns that multiple-service coverage may overburden one acute care surgeon, time-dependent quality metrics and studies done during the initial workup of trauma patients remained unchanged. These findings suggest that simultaneous trauma and EGS service coverage by one acute care surgeon does not adversely impact trauma patient care.

摘要

背景

在美国的许多创伤中心,一位急症外科医生负责夜间急症普外科(EGS)和创伤服务的覆盖。这种排班现象对创伤护理的质量和安全的影响尚未得到研究。

方法

在该机构采用这种排班现象后,研究了 2013 年至 2015 年期间在学术性一级创伤中心接受夜间(12:00 AM 至 7:00 AM)创伤入院的患者。根据接诊外科医生仅覆盖创伤服务,还是同时覆盖创伤和 EGS 服务(“多服务覆盖”),将入院患者分为两组。比较了四大结局(如死亡率和并发症)、六项质量指标(如首次手术就诊时间和无计划转入 ICU)和手术操作利用模式。

结果

共纳入 1046 例入院患者。两组暴露组之间在任何主要结局上均无差异,包括任何国家创伤数据库定义的并发症(OR 1.1,95%CI 0.8-1.5,P=0.5)。依赖于接诊外科医生的质量指标保持不变,包括到达后 15 分钟内主治医生到达最高级别创伤激活的比例(93%对 86%,P=0.07)和紧急手术干预的时间(68 分钟对 82 分钟,P=0.9)。接诊外科医生为每位患者进行的实验室和影像学检查次数(4.1 对 4.1,P=0.9)或床边干预次数(1.8 对 2.1,P=0.4)也无差异。多变量逻辑回归并未将多服务覆盖确定为不良患者结局或质量指标的独立危险因素。

结论

同时覆盖多个服务的外科医生接诊的创伤入院患者与仅覆盖创伤服务的外科医生接诊的创伤入院患者相比,其结局、质量指标和手术操作利用模式相似。尽管有人担心多服务覆盖可能会使一名急症外科医生负担过重,但与创伤患者初始评估相关的时间依赖性质量指标和检查未发生变化。这些发现表明,一名急症外科医生同时覆盖创伤和 EGS 服务不会对创伤患者的护理产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfc8/8712380/05091054adbc/nihms-1750743-f0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Acute Diverticulitis Outcomes in the Acute Care Surgery Model.急性憩室炎在急性外科治疗模型中的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):623-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验