Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 15;299:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.049. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Background The effects of a single bout of resistance exercise (RE) on state anxiety and worry symptoms are understudied. Further, how resistance exercise training (RET) changes response to acute RE is unknown. Methods Sixty-two untrained young adults (mean age (y):26.6; RET n = 27, Wait-list (WL): n = 35, 62.9% female) were randomized to an eight-week, ecologically-valid, guidelines-based RET condition, or eight-week WL control condition. Two acute RE trials were nested within the design at week one and eight, to determine RE response, and change in RE response following RET. The RET condition completed a twice-weekly RET intervention. The WL condition completed 30-minute bouts of quiet-rest at week one and eight. Two-condition (RE/quiet-rest) x two-time (pre/post) x two-session (weeks one/eight) RM-ANCOVAs examined differences between acute RE and quiet-rest pre-post and between acute sessions. Sub-analyses were conducted among young adults with analogue-Generalized Anxiety Disorder (AGAD). Primary outcomes were anxiety and worry symptoms. Results Compliance was 99% (Rate of perceived exertion (6-20) = 14±1, Muscle soreness (1-10)=4 ± 2), with no adverse events. There were no significant three-way interactions for anxiety symptoms or worry symptoms (all p ≥ 0.51) among the total sample or AGAD sample. The magnitude of change in outcomes at each session for both samples were small and non-significant (Hedges' d = -0.26 to 0.23). Limitations Post-condition assessment of primary outcomes was only conducted at a single time point. Conclusion RE did not elicit significant reductions in state anxiety or worry symptoms ten minutes post-RE. RET did not change response to acute RE. Clinicians should encourage RET for maximum anxiolytic benefits.
单次抗阻运动(RE)对状态焦虑和担忧症状的影响尚未得到充分研究。此外,抗阻运动训练(RET)如何改变对急性 RE 的反应尚不清楚。
62 名未经训练的年轻成年人(平均年龄(y):26.6;RET 组 n=27,等待名单(WL)组 n=35,62.9%为女性)被随机分配到为期八周、基于生态学的、基于指南的 RET 条件或八周 WL 对照组。在设计中嵌套了两个急性 RE 试验,以确定 RE 反应以及 RET 后 RE 反应的变化。RET 条件每周完成两次 RET 干预。WL 条件在第一周和第八周完成 30 分钟的安静休息。两条件(RE/安静休息)x 两时间(前后)x 两试验(第 1 周/第 8 周)重复测量方差分析检验了急性 RE 和安静休息前后的差异以及急性试验之间的差异。亚分析在具有模拟广泛性焦虑障碍(AGAD)的年轻成年人中进行。主要结果是焦虑和担忧症状。
依从性为 99%(感觉用力程度(6-20)=14±1,肌肉酸痛(1-10)=4±2),没有不良反应。在总样本或 AGAD 样本中,焦虑症状或担忧症状均无显著三向交互作用(均 p≥0.51)。两个样本的每个试验的结局变化幅度都很小且无统计学意义(Hedges' d=-0.26 至 0.23)。
主要结局的后条件评估仅在一个时间点进行。
RE 在 RE 后十分钟内未引起状态焦虑或担忧症状的显著降低。RET 并未改变对急性 RE 的反应。临床医生应鼓励 RET 以获得最大的抗焦虑益处。