Suppr超能文献

放射科住院医师面试是否应继续采用线上形式?一项多机构调查结果为这场辩论提供了参考。

Should Radiology Residency Interviews Remain Virtual? Results of a Multi-institutional Survey Inform the Debate.

作者信息

Moran Shamus K, Nguyen Jeffers K, Grimm Lars J, Yee Janis M, Maxfield Charles M, Shah Neal, Heitkamp Darel E, Chapman Teresa

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195.

Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2022 Oct;29(10):1595-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The recent completion of the inaugural virtual interview season has triggered calls for the permanency of virtual interviews in the radiology resident selection process. We designed a study to assess the inaugural 2020-2021 virtual interview season and inform the anticipated debate on the future of radiology residency interviews.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four and 39-question survey instruments developed for program directors (PDs) and applicants, respectively, were distributed through the Radiology Residency Education Research Alliance to measure the demographics, experiences with technology, attitudes toward the virtual interview season and attitudes about proposed changes to the interview process. Comparisons were made between demographics and survey queries.

RESULTS

PD and applicant response rates were 74% (25/34) and 45% (84/186), respectively. Eighty percent (20/25) of PDs and 76% (64/84) of applicants described the virtual interview season as excellent or very good. Sixty percent of PDs agreed or strongly agreed with the statement "The benefits of the virtual interview season outweighed the drawbacks," while 24% disagreed or strongly disagreed, and 16% were neutral. Among applicants, 80% agreed or strongly agreed, 10% disagreed or strongly disagreed, and 10% were neutral toward the same statement. Ninety-two percent of PDs noted that their rank order list performed the same or better than in years prior. Both PDs and applicants identified applicant equity and wellness as major benefits of virtual interviews, while identifying over-application and interview hoarding as significant detriments.

CONCLUSION

The virtual interview provides an adequate substitute for the conventional in-person residency interview, with real and perceived benefits to applicant wellness, equity, and financial well-being. The downsides of virtual interviews, namely over-application and interview hoarding, have workable solutions.

摘要

原理与目的

首个虚拟面试季的近期结束引发了关于虚拟面试在放射科住院医师选拔过程中永久性的呼声。我们设计了一项研究来评估2020 - 2021年首个虚拟面试季,并为即将到来的关于放射科住院医师面试未来的辩论提供信息。

材料与方法

分别为项目主任(PDs)和申请者开发的44题和39题调查问卷,通过放射科住院医师教育研究联盟进行分发,以衡量人口统计学特征、技术体验、对虚拟面试季的态度以及对面试流程提议变更的态度。对人口统计学特征和调查问题进行了比较。

结果

PDs和申请者的回复率分别为74%(25/34)和45%(84/186)。80%(20/25)的PDs和76%(64/84)的申请者将虚拟面试季描述为优秀或非常好。60%的PDs同意或强烈同意“虚拟面试季的好处超过了坏处”这一说法,而24%不同意或强烈不同意,16%持中立态度。在申请者中,80%同意或强烈同意,10%不同意或强烈不同意,10%对同一说法持中立态度。92%的PDs指出他们的排名顺序列表表现与往年相同或更好。PDs和申请者都将申请者公平性和健康视为虚拟面试的主要好处,同时将过度申请和面试囤积视为重大不利因素。

结论

虚拟面试为传统的面对面住院医师面试提供了充分的替代方案,对申请者的健康、公平性和经济状况有实际和感知到的好处。虚拟面试的缺点,即过度申请和面试囤积,有可行的解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验