• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间面对面与虚拟住院医师访谈的比较。

A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1175-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.006
PMID:33250429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7678431/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Traditional in-person fellowship interviews require great time and financial commitments. Here, we studied the response of program directors (PDs) and applicants to virtual interviews. Virtual interviews could decrease both financial and time commitments.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if most applicants and PDs believed that virtual interviews should be used more widely in the future.

DESIGN

After the 2020 cardiothoracic fellowship match, an e-mail survey was sent to 66 program directors and 107 applicants using the Qualtrics platform.

SETTING

During the 2020 cardiothoracic fellowship interview cycle, the COVID-19 pandemic shut down travel for in-person interviews. This forced a transition to virtual interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 107 applicants emailed, 46 (44%) participated with a completion rate of 87%. sixty-six PDs were contacted and of those, 36 (55%) participated with a 92% survey completion rate.

EXPOSURE

All survey participants were participants in the 2020 cardiothoracic match. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): (1) The percent of participants who agree that virtual interviews should be continued in the future and the percent of participants who agree that virtual interviews could be replacements for in person interviews. (2) Were virtual interviews perceived to have a negative impact on one's ultimate match? (3) What is the current cost of an in-person interview in travel and lodging for an applicant?

RESULTS

Fourty-six applicants (44% participation rate) and 36 PDs (55% participation rate) participated in the survey. Seventy-nine percent of program directors and 55% of applicants either agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews should be offered in the future. However, just 15% of PDs and 20% of applicants either agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews should be offered without the option of an in-person interview. Twenty-five percent of PDs and applicants agreed or strongly agreed that virtual interviews negatively impacted their chance of matching one of their top applicants/programs. The median cost of an in-person interview was $600 (interquatile range 500-725).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Most applicants and PDs agree that virtual interviews should be offered in the future. Twenty-five percent of participants reported that they believed virtual interviews negatively impacted their match. Given the overall acceptance of virtual interviews and the cost of in-person interviews, virtual interviews could be useful to incorporate into future interview seasons.

摘要

重要性

传统的现场研究员面试需要大量的时间和财务投入。在这里,我们研究了项目主管(PD)和申请人对虚拟面试的反应。虚拟面试可以减少时间和财务投入。

目的

确定大多数申请人和 PD 是否认为未来应该更广泛地使用虚拟面试。

设计

在 2020 年心胸外科研究员匹配后,使用 Qualtrics 平台向 66 名项目主管和 107 名申请人发送了电子邮件调查。

背景

在 2020 年心胸外科研究员面试周期中,COVID-19 大流行使面对面的面试无法进行。这迫使我们转向虚拟面试。

参与者

共向 107 名申请人发送电子邮件,其中 46 名(44%)参加,完成率为 87%。联系了 66 名 PD,其中 36 名(55%)参加,调查完成率为 92%。

暴露情况

所有调查参与者均为 2020 年心胸外科比赛的参与者。

主要结果和测量指标

(1)同意未来继续进行虚拟面试的参与者比例和同意虚拟面试可以替代面对面面试的参与者比例。(2)虚拟面试是否被认为对最终匹配产生负面影响?(3)申请人参加一次现场面试的交通和住宿费用是多少?

结果

46 名申请人(44%的参与率)和 36 名 PD(55%的参与率)参加了调查。79%的项目主管和 55%的申请人表示,他们要么同意要么强烈同意未来应该提供虚拟面试。然而,只有 15%的 PD 和 20%的申请人表示要么同意要么强烈同意在没有面对面面试的情况下提供虚拟面试。25%的 PD 和申请人认为虚拟面试对他们与首选申请人/项目匹配的机会产生了负面影响。一次现场面试的中位数费用为 600 美元(四分位距 500-725 美元)。

结论和相关性

大多数申请人和 PD 同意未来应该提供虚拟面试。25%的参与者报告说,他们认为虚拟面试对他们的匹配产生了负面影响。鉴于虚拟面试的总体接受程度和现场面试的成本,虚拟面试可能有助于纳入未来的面试季节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/9e6e13227cfd/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/5a6963f62d5c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/71461f48541c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/9e6e13227cfd/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/5a6963f62d5c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/71461f48541c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7678431/9e6e13227cfd/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间面对面与虚拟住院医师访谈的比较。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1175-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
The virtual interview format for fellowship recruitment in obstetrics and gynecology: a nationwide survey of program directors.妇产科研究员招聘的虚拟面试形式:对项目主任的全国性调查。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2054304. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2054304.
3
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 2020 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship application cycle: A survey of applicants.COVID-19 大流行对 2020 年小儿麻醉住院医师培训申请周期的影响:对申请人的调查。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Sep;31(9):968-976. doi: 10.1111/pan.14226. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Vascular In-person for Students In the match Trial: An investigation of postinterview site visits to address the limitations of virtual interviews.血管内人对学生在比赛试验:调查后采访现场访问,以解决虚拟面试的局限性。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):564-571.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.439. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
5
Ophthalmology Residency Match in the Covid-19 Era: Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.新冠疫情时代的眼科住院医师匹配:2020-2021 申请周期中申请人和项目主任的看法。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Virtual Interviews for the Independent Plastic Surgery Match: A Modern Convenience or a Modern Misrepresentation?独立整形外科匹配的虚拟面试:现代便利还是现代误导?
J Surg Educ. 2021 Mar-Apr;78(2):612-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Program Director Opinions of Virtual Interviews: Whatever Makes my Partners Happy.项目主管对虚拟面试的看法:只要能让我的搭档们开心就行。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e12-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 May 9.
8
Virtual Pediatric Orthopaedic Fellowship Interviews During the Pandemic: What Did the Applicants and Programs Think?疫情期间的虚拟儿骨科住院医师面试:申请人和项目组的想法是什么?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Aug 1;42(7):e806-e810. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002193. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Perceptions and lessons from web-based interviews for the reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship application cycle.生殖内分泌与不孕不育研究员申请周期中基于网络的访谈的认知与体会。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):872-881. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.了解泌尿外科项目主任对当前住院医师选拔过程的看法:学术泌尿外科学会对泌尿外科项目主任的全国调查。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Jun;80(6):900-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.02.015. Epub 2023 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Person and Virtual Interviews for Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship: An Applicant's Perspective.复杂普通外科肿瘤学 fellowship 的现场面试和虚拟面试:申请人视角
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18247-z.
2
Virtual versus In-Person: What Applicants Really Want in the Interview Process.虚拟面试与现场面试:求职者在面试过程中真正想要的是什么。
ATS Sch. 2024 Dec 30;5(4):482-485. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0131ED. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Factors that Influence Applicant Choice of In-Person versus Virtual Interview Format.
影响申请者选择面对面面试形式还是虚拟面试形式的因素。
ATS Sch. 2024 Oct 30;5(4):575-586. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0027OC. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Virtual Interviews for Breast Imaging Fellowship During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Program Directors and Applicants.COVID-19大流行期间乳腺影像 fellowship 的虚拟面试:项目主任和申请者的观点
J Breast Imaging. 2022 Jun 7;4(3):309-319. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbac017.
5
Breast Imaging Fellowship Virtual Interviews: The Program Director's Perspective.乳腺影像学奖学金虚拟面试:项目主任的视角。
J Breast Imaging. 2024 Jan 19;6(1):80-85. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad072.
6
Multicenter Study of Optional In-Person Visits to Residency Programs After Virtual Interviews.多中心研究:虚拟面试后选择性地进行住院医师项目实地考察。
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Dec;15(6):692-701. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00370.1.
7
Deconstructing the roadmap to surgical residency: a national survey of residents illuminates factors associated with recruitment success as well as applicants' needs and beliefs.剖析外科住院医师培训之路:一项针对住院医师的全国性调查揭示了与招募成功相关的因素以及申请者的需求和信念。
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00070-9. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
8
The impact of virtual interviews on the Fellowship Council application and main match process.虚拟面试对奖学金委员会申请及主要匹配过程的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9601-9608. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10424-z. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
9
Virtual versus In-Person Ophthalmology Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2022-2023.虚拟面试与面对面眼科面试:2022 - 2023年美国眼科住院医师申请人员的看法
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023 Sep 12;15(2):e197-e203. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772458. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
Virtual Ophthalmology Fellowship Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2020.虚拟眼科住院医师培训面试:2020年美国眼科住院医师培训申请者的看法
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Nov 10;13(2):e102-e107. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733938. eCollection 2021 Jul.