Suppr超能文献

不同垂直颅面型中颧下嵴和下颌颊侧骨板的微螺钉植入部位:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。

Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

作者信息

Matias Murilo, Flores-Mir Carlos, Almeida Márcio Rodrigues de, Vieira Bruno da Silva, Freitas Karina Maria Salvatore de, Nunes Daniela Calabrese, Ferreira Marcos Cezar, Ursi Weber

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Guarulhos University, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):387-396. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.387.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify optimal areas for the insertion of extra-alveolar miniscrews into the infrazygomatic crest (IZC) and mandibular buccal shelf (MBS), using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in patients with different craniofacial patterns.

METHODS

CBCT reconstructions of untreated individuals were used to evaluate the IZC and MBS areas. The participants were divided into three groups, based on the craniofacial pattern, namely, brachyfacial (n = 15; mean age, 23.3 years), mesofacial (n = 15; mean age, 19.24 years), and dolichofacial (n = 15; mean age, 17.79 years). In the IZC, the evaluated areas were at 11, 13, and 15 mm above the buccal cusp tips of the right and left first molars. In the MBS, the evaluated areas were at the projections of the first molars' distal roots and second molars' mesial and distal roots, at a 4- and 8-mm distance from the cementoenamel junction. Intergroup comparisons were performed with analysis of variance and the Tukey test.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the IZC bone thickness among the groups. For MBS bone availability, some comparisons revealed no difference; meanwhile, other comparisons revealed increased MBS bone thickness in the brachyfacial (first molars distal roots) and dolichofacial (second molars mesial and distal roots) patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the IZC bone thickness among the groups. The facial skeletal pattern may affect the availability of ideal bone thickness for the insertion of extra-alveolar miniscrews in the MBS region; however, this variability is unlikely to be clinically meaningful.

摘要

目的

利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像技术,确定不同颅面型患者在颧下嵴(IZC)和下颌颊侧牙槽嵴顶(MBS)植入牙槽外微型螺钉的最佳区域。

方法

使用未经治疗个体的CBCT重建图像评估IZC和MBS区域。根据颅面型将参与者分为三组,即短面型(n = 15;平均年龄23.3岁)、中面型(n = 15;平均年龄19.24岁)和长面型(n = 15;平均年龄17.79岁)。在IZC,评估区域位于左右第一磨牙颊尖上方11、13和15毫米处。在MBS,评估区域位于第一磨牙远中根以及第二磨牙近中根和远中根的投影处,距离牙骨质釉质界4毫米和8毫米。采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行组间比较。

结果

各组间IZC骨厚度无统计学显著差异。对于MBS的骨量,一些比较显示无差异;同时,其他比较显示短面型(第一磨牙远中根)和长面型(第二磨牙近中根和远中根)模式下MBS骨厚度增加。

结论

各组间IZC骨厚度无显著差异。面部骨骼模式可能会影响在MBS区域植入牙槽外微型螺钉的理想骨厚度的可用性;然而,这种变异性在临床上可能没有意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46df/8607118/02ae2b6fd45e/kjod-51-6-387-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验