• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚人群下颌颊侧牙槽嵴特征评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。

Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

作者信息

Escobar-Correa Natalia, Ramírez-Bustamante Maria Antonia, Sánchez-Uribe Luis Alejandro, Upegui-Zea Juan Carlos, Vergara-Villarreal Patricia, Ramírez-Ossa Diana Milena

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.

出版信息

Korean J Orthod. 2021 Jan 25;51(1):23-31. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.1.23.

DOI:10.4041/kjod.2021.51.1.23
PMID:33446618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7837802/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) in terms of the angulation and bone depth and thickness according to sex, age, and sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in a Colombian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Accordingly, the optimal site for miniscrew insertion in this area was determined.

METHODS

This descriptive, retrospective study included 64 hemi-arches of 34 patients. On CBCT images, the angulation, buccal bone depth (4 and 6 mm from the cementoenamel junction [CEJ] of MBS), and buccal bone thickness (6 and 11 mm from the CEJ of MBS) were measured at the mesial and distal roots of the mandibular first and second molars.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the angulation, depth, and thickness of MBS between male and female patients. The values for the bone around the distal root of the mandibular second molar were significantly greater than the other values. The osseous characteristics were significantly better in participants aged 16-24 years. Class III patients exhibited the best osseous characteristics, with the bone depth at 6 mm being significantly different from that in Class I and Class II patients. Although values tended to be greater in patients with low angles, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

MBS provides an optimal bone surface for miniscrew insertion, with better osseous characteristics at the distal root of the mandibular second molar, 4 mm from CEJ. Adolescent patients, Class III patients, and patients with a low angle exhibit the most favorable osseous characteristics in the MBS area.

摘要

目的

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),根据性别、年龄以及矢状和垂直骨骼模式,评估哥伦比亚人群下颌颊侧牙槽嵴(MBS)的角度、骨深度和厚度。据此确定该区域微型螺钉植入的最佳部位。

方法

这项描述性回顾性研究纳入了34例患者的64个半牙弓。在CBCT图像上,在下颌第一和第二磨牙的近中根和远中根处测量角度、颊侧骨深度(距MBS牙釉质牙骨质界[CEJ]4和6mm处)以及颊侧骨厚度(距MBS的CEJ 6和11mm处)。

结果

男性和女性患者的MBS在角度、深度和厚度方面无统计学显著差异。下颌第二磨牙远中根周围的骨值明显大于其他值。16 - 24岁参与者的骨质特征明显更好。III类患者表现出最佳的骨质特征,6mm处的骨深度与I类和II类患者有显著差异。尽管低角患者的值往往更大,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

MBS为微型螺钉植入提供了最佳骨面,在下颌第二磨牙远中根距CEJ 4mm处骨质特征更佳。青少年患者、III类患者和低角患者在MBS区域表现出最有利的骨质特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/02e74943cc1b/kjod-51-1-23-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/604189e90f1a/kjod-51-1-23-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/89cbcbbf118e/kjod-51-1-23-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/38a4c2304e61/kjod-51-1-23-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/02e74943cc1b/kjod-51-1-23-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/604189e90f1a/kjod-51-1-23-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/89cbcbbf118e/kjod-51-1-23-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/38a4c2304e61/kjod-51-1-23-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3823/7837802/02e74943cc1b/kjod-51-1-23-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study.哥伦比亚人群下颌颊侧牙槽嵴特征评估:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Jan 25;51(1):23-31. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.1.23.
2
A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Bone Volume Variations of Extra-alveolar Region Based on Sex, Age, Vertical and Sagittal Facial Patterns.基于性别、年龄、面型的牙槽外区域骨量变化的锥形束 CT 分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):e660-e664. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009506. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.成人下颌颊棚区微型种植体植入的骨与皮质骨厚度。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):745-751. doi: 10.2319/011117-34.1. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
4
Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.不同垂直颅面型中颧下嵴和下颌颊侧骨板的微螺钉植入部位:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):387-396. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.387.
5
Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Buccal Shelf Dimensions in South Indian Patients With Sagittal Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study.南印度矢状骨面型III类错牙合患者颊侧牙槽嵴尺寸的计算机断层扫描评估:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43883. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43883. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study.CBCT 比较不同部位、深度和角度的成年达罗毗荼人群颊棚骨厚度-一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2021 Sep;19(3):471-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT.利用 CBCT 对下颌牙列进行远移时,微型种植体植入的安全区域。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Dec 9;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0297-6.
8
Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status.不同生长型、性别和生长状态个体下颌颊棚区宽度和高度的变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Jan;159(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.020. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
9
Mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.不同垂直骨面型的未治疗 I 类错[牙合]患者下颌牙槽骨厚度的锥形束 CT 研究。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Nov 1;93(6):683-694. doi: 10.2319/030523-151.1.
10
Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf bone characteristics between two facial types using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较两种面部类型的下颌颊侧牙槽骨特征。
Indian J Dent Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;33(3):277-281. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1201_21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Area for Mini Screw Placement in Different Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A CBCT Study.不同矢状和垂直骨骼型中用于微型螺钉植入的下颌颊棚区评估:一项锥形束CT研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3986-S3991. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_669_24. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Is the mandibular buccal shelf anatomy related to craniofacial morphology? A cross-sectional CBCT study.下颌颊侧牙槽嵴顶解剖结构与颅面形态有关吗?一项横断面CBCT研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jan 1;30(1):e135-e140. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26897.
3
Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT.

本文引用的文献

1
An Umbrella Review of the Effectiveness of Temporary Anchorage Devices and the Factors That Contribute to Their Success or Failure.临时支抗装置有效性的伞形评价及影响其成败的因素。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020 Jun;20(2):101402. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101402. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Comparison of bone thickness in infrazygomatic crest area at various miniscrew insertion angles in Dravidian population - A cone beam computed tomography study.印度-雅利安人种不同微型螺钉植入角度下眶下嵴区域骨厚度的比较——锥形束 CT 研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
利用 CBCT 对不同垂直型青少年与成年人下颌颊棚形态的比较
Oral Radiol. 2024 Jan;40(1):58-68. doi: 10.1007/s11282-023-00710-w. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
Influence of the third molar presence on the thickness and height of the buccal cortical bone of the mandibular first and second molars.第三磨牙的存在对下颌第一和第二磨牙颊侧皮质骨厚度和高度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Jun 1;15(6):e478-e487. doi: 10.4317/jced.60428. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
骨性安氏II类和III类错牙合与垂直骨面型的关系。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):63-72. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.063-072.oar.
4
Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.正畸微型种植体在前腭部的理想植入角度和位置是否存在?一项对人体的 CBCT 研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.019.
5
Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.白人患者下颌颊侧骨板用于微螺钉植入的解剖学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014.
6
Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.成人下颌颊棚区微型种植体植入的骨与皮质骨厚度。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):745-751. doi: 10.2319/011117-34.1. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌牙根间骨进行定量评估以确定正畸微型种植体的双皮质放置。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jun;147(6):725-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.018.
8
Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva.植入活动黏膜或附着龈的1680枚牙槽外下颌颊侧骨板微型螺钉的初次失败率。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):905-10. doi: 10.2319/092714.695.1. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Use of mini-implants to avoid maxillary surgery for Class III mandibular prognathic patient: a long-term post-retention case.使用微型种植体避免对Ⅲ类下颌前突患者进行上颌手术:1例长期保持病例。
Korean J Orthod. 2014 Nov;44(6):342-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.6.342. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.利用锥形束 CT 测量不同面型患者牙槽嵴皮质骨厚度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Feb;143(2):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.013.