• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巢区卫生行为不会增加银鸥拒绝寄生卵的可能性。

Nest sanitation behavior does not increase the likelihood of parasitic egg rejection in herring gulls.

作者信息

Stratton James B, Dearborn Donald C

机构信息

Department of Biology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, 04240, USA.

出版信息

Curr Zool. 2021 Jun 4;67(6):675-682. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab046. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1093/cz/zoab046
PMID:34805545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8599063/
Abstract

Birds' behavioral response to brood parasitism can be influenced not only by evolution but also by context and individual experience. This could include nest sanitation, in which birds remove debris from their nests. Ultimately, nest sanitation behavior might be an evolutionary precursor to the rejection of parasitic eggs. Proximately, the context or experience of performing nest sanitation behavior might increase the detection or prime the removal of parasitic eggs, but evidence to date is limited. We tested incubation-stage nests of herring gulls to ask whether nest sanitation increased parasitic egg rejection. In an initial set of 160 single-object experiments, small, red, blocky objects were usually rejected (18 of 20 nests), whereas life-sized, 3D-printed herring gull eggs were not rejected whether red (0 of 20) or the olive-tan base color of herring gull eggs (0 of 20). Next, we simultaneously presented a red, 3D-printed gull egg and a small, red block. These nests exhibited frequent nest sanitation (small, red block removed at 40 of 48 nests), but egg rejection remained uncommon (5 of those 40) and not significantly different from control nests (5 of 49) which received the parasitic egg but not the priming object. Thus, performance of nest sanitation did not shape individuals' responses to parasitism. Interestingly, parents were more likely to reject the parasitic egg when they were present as we approached the nest to add the experimental objects. Depending on the underlying mechanism, this could also be a case of experience creating variation in responses to parasitism.

摘要

鸟类对巢寄生的行为反应不仅会受到进化的影响,还会受到环境和个体经验的影响。这可能包括巢清洁行为,即鸟类清除巢中的杂物。最终,巢清洁行为可能是拒绝寄生卵的进化先驱。近期来看,进行巢清洁行为的环境或经验可能会增加对寄生卵的检测或促使其被清除,但迄今为止的证据有限。我们对银鸥孵化期的巢穴进行了测试,以探究巢清洁行为是否会增加对寄生卵的拒绝。在最初的160个单物体实验中,小型、红色、块状物体通常会被拒绝(20个巢穴中有18个),而真人大小的3D打印银鸥蛋,无论其是红色(20个中0个)还是银鸥蛋的橄榄褐色底色(20个中0个),都不会被拒绝。接下来,我们同时展示一个红色的3D打印鸥蛋和一个小型红色方块。这些巢穴频繁出现巢清洁行为(48个巢穴中有40个移除了小型红色方块),但卵拒绝情况仍然不常见(40个中有5个),且与接受寄生卵但未接触引发物体的对照巢穴(49个中有5个)没有显著差异。因此,巢清洁行为并没有塑造个体对寄生的反应。有趣的是,当我们靠近巢穴添加实验物体时,如果亲鸟在场,它们更有可能拒绝寄生卵。根据潜在机制,这也可能是经验导致对寄生反应产生差异的一个例子。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/be288bc096b2/zoab046f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/5ec1a79111b9/zoab046f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/14c801fdae82/zoab046f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/be288bc096b2/zoab046f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/5ec1a79111b9/zoab046f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/14c801fdae82/zoab046f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/8599063/be288bc096b2/zoab046f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Nest sanitation behavior does not increase the likelihood of parasitic egg rejection in herring gulls.巢区卫生行为不会增加银鸥拒绝寄生卵的可能性。
Curr Zool. 2021 Jun 4;67(6):675-682. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab046. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Egg Rejection and Nest Sanitation in an Island Population of Barn Swallows (): Probability, Response Latency, and Sex Effects.岛屿家燕种群中的卵排斥与巢穴卫生():概率、反应潜伏期和性别效应
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;12(21):3027. doi: 10.3390/ani12213027.
3
Nest sanitation as the evolutionary background for egg ejection behaviour and the role of motivation for object removal.巢卫生作为卵排出行为的进化背景以及物体移除动机的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 6;8(11):e78771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078771. eCollection 2013.
4
Nest sanitation facilitates egg recognition in the common tailorbird, a plaintive cuckoo host.巢的卫生有助于普通缝叶莺识别自己的卵,而普通缝叶莺是一种哀怨的杜鹃宿主。
Zool Res. 2019 Sep 18;40(5):466-470. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.054.
5
A test of the nest sanitation hypothesis for the evolution of foreign egg rejection in an avian brood parasite rejecter host species.对一种鸟类巢寄生拒斥宿主物种中,外来卵拒斥行为进化的巢卫生假说的一项测试。
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Apr;104(3-4):14. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1446-8. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Nest sanitation as an effective defence against brood parasitism.巢内卫生作为防止巢寄生的有效防御措施。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01646-0. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
Nest sanitation does not elicit egg ejection in a brown-headed cowbird host.鸟巢卫生状况不会引发褐头牛鹂宿主的弃蛋行为。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):371-374. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1059-1. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
The role of egg-nest contrast in the rejection of brood parasitic eggs.卵巢对比在拒绝巢寄生卵中的作用。
J Exp Biol. 2015 Apr 15;218(Pt 8):1126-36. doi: 10.1242/jeb.108449. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts.杜鹃(大杜鹃)寄主中卵识别与弃卵决策之间的冲突。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Oct;10(4):377-86. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0071-x. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
10
Impact of nest sanitation behavior on hosts' egg rejection: an empirical study and meta-analyses.巢清洁行为对宿主卵排斥的影响:一项实证研究与荟萃分析
Curr Zool. 2021 Jul 13;67(6):683-690. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab057. eCollection 2021 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Egg Rejection and Nest Sanitation in an Island Population of Barn Swallows (): Probability, Response Latency, and Sex Effects.岛屿家燕种群中的卵排斥与巢穴卫生():概率、反应潜伏期和性别效应
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;12(21):3027. doi: 10.3390/ani12213027.
2
Nest sanitation as an effective defence against brood parasitism.巢内卫生作为防止巢寄生的有效防御措施。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01646-0. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Personality, recognition cues, and nest sanitation in obligate avian brood parasitism: what do we know and what comes next?

本文引用的文献

1
Parasitism is always costly to the host.寄生虫对宿主总是有代价的。
Zool Res. 2021 Mar 18;42(2):217-220. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.332.
2
Endocrine regulation of egg rejection in an avian brood parasite host.鸟类孵育寄生宿主中卵排斥的内分泌调节。
Biol Lett. 2020 Jun;16(6):20200225. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0225. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Proximate predictors of variation in egg rejection behavior by hosts of avian brood parasites.鸟类巢寄生宿主卵拒绝行为变异的近因预测因素。
专性鸟类巢寄生中的个性、识别线索与巢卫生状况:我们了解了什么以及接下来要做什么?
Curr Zool. 2021 Sep 20;67(6):621-623. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab079. eCollection 2021 Dec.
J Comp Psychol. 2020 Nov;134(4):412-422. doi: 10.1037/com0000225. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Nest sanitation facilitates egg recognition in the common tailorbird, a plaintive cuckoo host.巢的卫生有助于普通缝叶莺识别自己的卵,而普通缝叶莺是一种哀怨的杜鹃宿主。
Zool Res. 2019 Sep 18;40(5):466-470. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.054.
5
A test of the nest sanitation hypothesis for the evolution of foreign egg rejection in an avian brood parasite rejecter host species.对一种鸟类巢寄生拒斥宿主物种中,外来卵拒斥行为进化的巢卫生假说的一项测试。
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Apr;104(3-4):14. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1446-8. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Nest sanitation does not elicit egg ejection in a brown-headed cowbird host.鸟巢卫生状况不会引发褐头牛鹂宿主的弃蛋行为。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):371-374. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1059-1. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Replicable effects of primes on human behavior.启动效应对人类行为的可复制影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1269-1279. doi: 10.1037/xge0000201.
8
Impact of nest sanitation on the immune system of parents and nestlings in a passerine bird.鸟巢卫生状况对一种雀形目鸟类亲鸟和雏鸟免疫系统的影响
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jul 1;219(Pt 13):1985-93. doi: 10.1242/jeb.130948. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Nest sanitation elicits egg discrimination in cuckoo hosts.巢的卫生状况引发了杜鹃寄主对卵的辨别行为。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1373-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0898-5. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
The evolution of acceptance and tolerance in hosts of avian brood parasites.宿主对鸟类巢寄生者的接受和容忍的进化。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Aug;91(3):569-77. doi: 10.1111/brv.12181. Epub 2015 Mar 12.