Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
J Asthma. 2022 Nov;59(11):2189-2200. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.2008430. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
To summarize the principal findings of all available studies that have evaluated the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on an intermittent or as-needed basis as an add-on therapy to short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) or fast-acting β2-agonists (FABAs) in pediatric asthmatic patients. Studies could either include or omit the use of ICS during stable periods of the disease.
Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to February 2021.
Relevant articles in the literature published by February 2021.
Of 294 references identified, 14 studies were included. The use of ICS on an intermittent or as-needed basis (as an add-on therapy to SABAs) has been shown to be more effective than treatment with SABA alone and to be similarly or less effective compared to regular daily ICS administration. Furthermore, strategies involving increasing the dose of ICS only when needed (as an add-on therapy to formoterol, a FABA) and keeping it low during stable stages of the disease (i.e. single maintenance and reliever therapy, SMART) have been shown to be similarly or more effective than comparators.
The use of ICS on an intermittent or as-needed basis as an add-on therapy to SABAs or FABAs, with or without ICS use during stable periods of the disease in pediatric asthmatic patients, encompasses several effective treatment strategies.
总结所有评估吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)按需间歇使用作为短期β2 受体激动剂(SABA)或速效β2 受体激动剂(FABA)附加治疗的研究的主要发现,这些研究可以包括或不包括疾病稳定期使用 ICS。
从开始到 2021 年 2 月,电子数据库 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库。
截至 2021 年 2 月发表的文献中的相关文章。
在 294 篇参考文献中,有 14 篇研究被纳入。与单独使用 SABA 相比,按需间歇使用 ICS(作为 SABA 的附加治疗)显示出更有效,与常规每日使用 ICS 相比,其效果相似或更低。此外,仅在需要时增加 ICS 剂量(作为 FABA 福莫特罗的附加治疗)并在疾病稳定期保持低剂量(即单一维持和缓解治疗,SMART)的策略也显示出与对照相比相似或更有效。
在儿科哮喘患者中,按需间歇使用 ICS 作为 SABA 或 FABA 的附加治疗,无论疾病稳定期是否使用 ICS,都包含了几种有效的治疗策略。