Baik Seung-Min, Cynn Heon-Seock, Yi Chung-Hwi, Lee Ji-Hyun, Choi Jung-Hoon, Lee Kyung-Eun
Applied Kinesiology and Ergonomic Technology Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju, Kangwon-do, Korea.
Departement of Physical Therapy, Baekseok University, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(4):849-857. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210061.
The effectiveness of side-sling plank (SSP) exercises on trunk and hip muscle activation in subjects with gluteus medius (Gmed) weakness is unclear.
To quantify muscle activation of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), lumbar multifidus (LM), Gmed, gluteus maximus (Gmax), and tensor fasciae latae (TFL) during SSP with three different hip rotations compared to side-lying hip abduction (SHA) exercise in subjects with Gmed weakness.
Twenty-two subjects with Gmed weakness were recruited. SHA and three types of SSP exercises were performed: SSP with neutral hip (SSP-N), hip lateral rotation (SSP-L), and hip medial rotation (SSP-M). Surface electromyography was used to measure the activation of the trunk and hip muscles.
The trunk and hip muscles activations were generally significantly higher level during three SSP than SHA. SSP-M showed significantly lower EO activation while significantly higher ES and LM activation than SSP-L. Gmed activation was significantly higher during SSP-M than during SSP-L. TFL activation was significantly lower during SSP-M than during SSP-N and SSP-L.
SSP could be prescribed for patients who have reduced Gmed strength after injuries. Especially, SSP-M could be applied for patients who have Gmed weakness with dominant TFL.
对于患有臀中肌(Gmed)无力的受试者,侧平板支撑(SSP)练习对躯干和臀部肌肉激活的有效性尚不清楚。
与侧卧位髋外展(SHA)练习相比,量化患有Gmed无力的受试者在进行三种不同髋关节旋转的SSP过程中腹直肌(RA)、腹外斜肌(EO)、竖脊肌(ES)、腰多裂肌(LM)、Gmed、臀大肌(Gmax)和阔筋膜张肌(TFL)的肌肉激活情况。
招募了22名患有Gmed无力的受试者。进行了SHA和三种类型的SSP练习:中立位髋关节的SSP(SSP-N)、髋关节外旋的SSP(SSP-L)和髋关节内旋的SSP(SSP-M)。使用表面肌电图测量躯干和臀部肌肉的激活情况。
在三种SSP练习过程中,躯干和臀部肌肉的激活水平总体上显著高于SHA。与SSP-L相比,SSP-M显示出EO激活显著降低,而ES和LM激活显著升高。SSP-M期间Gmed的激活显著高于SSP-L期间。SSP-M期间TFL的激活显著低于SSP-N和SSP-L期间。
对于受伤后Gmed力量减弱的患者,可以开具SSP练习。特别是,SSP-M可应用于TFL占主导且患有Gmed无力的患者。