Bourcier Jean-Eudes, Gallard Emeric, Redonnet Jean-Philippe, Abillard Morgan, Billaut Quentin, Fauque Laura, Jouanolou Anna, Garnier Didier
Emergency, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France.
Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimation-Urgences, Hôpital de Lourdes, 2 Avenue Alexandre Marqui, 65100, Lourdes, France.
Ultrasound J. 2021 Nov 22;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00246-2.
Diagnosing a ureteral colic is sometimes difficult; however, clinicians should not fail to detect a surgical emergency. This is why diagnostic strategies depend on the imaging examinations, especially ultrasound. Prior studies have investigated the accuracy of Point of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS), but there are relatively few. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the PoCUS in the diagnosis of renal colic. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between the imaging results and the treatment performed.
After the clinical evaluation of patients aged > 18 years with suspected ureteral colic, the Emergency Physician (EP) trained in ultrasound performed PoCUS to conclude whether a diagnosis of "renal colic" should be made. A computed tomography (CT) examination was subsequently performed, to determine whether ureteral or bladder lithiasis was present to diagnose a ureteral colic. The patient's management was decided according to the to degree of urinary tract dilatation, presence of perinephric fluid, size, and localization of stones.
Of the 12 Eps in our units, seven met the training criteria for the inclusion of patients. A total of 103 patients were analyzed, and the renal colic diagnosis was retained in 85 cases after the CT examination. The accuracy of PoCUS was 91% (86; 95%) for detecting urinary tract dilatation, 83% (76; 90%) for detecting perinephric fluid, and 54% (44; 64%) for detecting lithiasis. Only high urinary tract stones with ≥ 6 mm diameter were surgically managed (p < 0.01). Conversely, distal ureteral stones with a diameter of < 6 mm were managed with medical ambulatory treatment (p < 0.05).
PoCUS is a good diagnostic tool, for renal colic, and could help reduce the requirement for the CT examinations and, hence, reduce induced radiation exposure.
输尿管绞痛的诊断有时颇具难度;然而,临床医生不应忽视外科急症的检测。这就是为何诊断策略依赖于影像学检查,尤其是超声检查。既往研究已对床旁超声(PoCUS)的准确性进行了调查,但相关研究相对较少。本研究旨在评估PoCUS在肾绞痛诊断中的性能。次要目标是评估影像学结果与所实施治疗之间的关系。
在对年龄大于18岁、疑似输尿管绞痛的患者进行临床评估后,接受过超声培训的急诊医生(EP)进行PoCUS检查,以判定是否应诊断为“肾绞痛”。随后进行计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,以确定是否存在输尿管或膀胱结石,从而诊断输尿管绞痛。根据尿路扩张程度、肾周积液情况、结石大小及位置来决定患者的治疗方案。
在我们科室的12名急诊医生中,有7名符合纳入患者的培训标准。共分析了103例患者,CT检查后85例被诊断为肾绞痛。PoCUS检测尿路扩张的准确率为91%(86;95%),检测肾周积液的准确率为83%(76;90%),检测结石的准确率为54%(44;64%)。仅直径≥6mm的上尿路结石接受了手术治疗(p<0.01)。相反,直径<6mm的输尿管下段结石采用门诊药物治疗(p<0.05)。
PoCUS是诊断肾绞痛的良好工具,有助于减少CT检查的需求,从而减少辐射暴露。