Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of California at San Francisco.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;74(2):223-226. doi: 10.1002/art.42031. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraarticular glucocorticoid (GC) injections are associated with increased knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, which have been reported to delay OA progression and knee replacement. METHODS: We identified participants from 2 large cohort studies, the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Study visits were performed at regular intervals and included questionnaires about intraarticular GC or HA injection use in the previous 6 months and incident total knee replacement (TKR). Knee radiographs were obtained at each study visit and interpreted in a similar manner. Outcome measures were radiographic progression based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade and joint space narrowing (JSN) for both cohorts and based on medial joint space width for OAI participants, and incident TKR. We compared preinjection and postinjection radiographs to generate rate ratios of progression comparing GC injection with HA injection. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the rate of TKR for both groups. RESULTS: We studied 791 participants (980 knees) with knee OA, of whom 629 reported GC injection use and 162 HA injection use. Rate ratios of progression were similar between those receiving GCs and those receiving HA for JSN (1.00 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83-1.21]), K/L grade (1.03 [95% CI 0.83-1.29]), and medial joint space width (1.03 [95% CI 0.72-1.48]). Hazard of TKR was slightly lower for those receiving intraarticular GC compared to those receiving HA (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.51-1.09]). CONCLUSION: Intraarticular GC injections are not associated with an increased risk of knee OA progression compared to HA.
目的:与已被报道能延缓骨关节炎(OA)进展和膝关节置换的透明质酸(HA)注射相比,确定关节内糖皮质激素(GC)注射是否会导致膝关节 OA 进展加速。
方法:我们从两个大型队列研究(骨关节炎倡议(OAI)和多中心骨关节炎研究)中确定了参与者。研究访问定期进行,包括过去 6 个月内关节内 GC 或 HA 注射的使用情况以及全膝关节置换(TKR)的发生情况。每次研究访问时都获得膝关节 X 射线,并以类似的方式进行解释。OAI 参与者的终点指标为基于 Kellgren/Lawrence(K/L)分级和关节间隙狭窄(JSN)的放射学进展,以及全膝关节置换的发生。我们比较了注射前和注射后的 X 射线照片,以生成比较 GC 注射与 HA 注射的进展率比。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计两组的 TKR 发生率。
结果:我们研究了 791 名(980 膝)膝关节 OA 患者,其中 629 名报告了 GC 注射使用,162 名报告了 HA 注射使用。对于 JSN(1.00[95%置信区间(95%CI)0.83-1.21])、K/L 分级(1.03[95%CI 0.83-1.29])和内侧关节间隙宽度(1.03[95%CI 0.72-1.48]),接受 GC 和接受 HA 的患者之间的进展率比相似。与接受关节内 HA 注射相比,接受关节内 GC 注射的 TKR 风险略低(风险比 0.75[95%CI 0.51-1.09])。
结论:与 HA 相比,关节内 GC 注射不会增加膝关节 OA 进展的风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022-2
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022-8
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019-1-29
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025-6-10
Microbiol Spectr. 2025-6-3
Pain Pract. 2025-1
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021-4
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019-1-29
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017-8-14
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008-11-12
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007