Spirituality and Mental Health Program.
Graduate School of Social Work.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2022 Sep;59(3):374-381. doi: 10.1037/pst0000400. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
Previous research suggests that patients receiving spiritual psychotherapy may have better outcomes when treatment is provided by nonreligious clinicians, compared to religious clinicians. We examined these effects within a large and clinically heterogeneous sample of patients ( = 1,443) receiving Spiritual Psychotherapy for Inpatient, Residential, and Intensive Treatment (SPIRIT; Rosmarin et al., 2019) by a diverse sample of clinicians ( = 22). In addition to demographics, patients completed a brief measure of their experience in SPIRIT; clinicians completed measures of previous mental health training, previous training in spiritual psychotherapy, and attitudes toward spiritual psychotherapy, and also provided details regarding modalities, clinical interventions, and spiritual interventions utilized at each SPIRIT session. Perceived benefit of SPIRIT was greater when treatment was delivered by non-religious clinicians. Mediating factors on these effects were evaluated using correlations and multiple regression analyses. Of 26 potential explanatory factors, only 4 were significant, all of which related to the therapeutic process. Nonreligious clinicians were more likely to utilize dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), facilitate coping, encourage spiritual coping, and explore the relevance of spirituality to mental health, all of which also predicted better perceived benefit from SPIRIT. All four variables jointly, but not severally, mediated relationships between clinician religion and perceived benefit of SPIRIT. These findings suggest that DBT may be the most effective modality for delivering spiritual psychotherapy to acute patients, particularly in a group setting. Future research should further examine preferences for clinical modalities and techniques among religious and nonreligious clinicians, and effects of such preferences on perceived benefit, in a variety of settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,与宗教临床医生相比,接受非宗教临床医生提供的精神心理治疗的患者,其治疗效果可能更好。我们在接受精神心理治疗住院、住宿和强化治疗(SPIRIT;Rosmarin 等人,2019)的大量且临床异质的患者样本(=1443)中检查了这些效果,这些患者由多样化的临床医生群体(=22)进行治疗。除了人口统计学数据外,患者还完成了一份简短的 SPIRIT 体验量表;临床医生完成了之前心理健康培训、精神心理治疗培训、对精神心理治疗的态度等方面的量表,还提供了有关每个 SPIRIT 治疗过程中所采用的模式、临床干预和精神干预的详细信息。当治疗由非宗教临床医生提供时,患者对 SPIRIT 的获益感知更大。通过相关性和多元回归分析评估了这些影响的中介因素。在 26 个潜在的解释因素中,只有 4 个是显著的,它们都与治疗过程有关。非宗教临床医生更有可能采用辩证行为疗法(DBT)、促进应对、鼓励精神应对以及探索精神与心理健康的相关性,所有这些都也预示着患者对 SPIRIT 的获益感知更好。这四个变量共同但非分别地,在临床医生宗教与 SPIRIT 获益感知之间的关系中起到了中介作用。这些发现表明,DBT 可能是为急性患者提供精神心理治疗的最有效模式,尤其是在团体环境中。未来的研究应进一步研究宗教和非宗教临床医生对临床模式和技术的偏好,以及在各种环境下,这些偏好对获益感知的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。