• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

【草乌甲素联合加巴喷丁治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效】

[Clinical efficacy of bulleyaconitine A combined with gabapentin on postherpetic neuralgia].

作者信息

Jin Y Y, Qin C H, Duan B L, Huang Y Q, Ma K

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.

Department of Pain Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 23;101(43):3575-3580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210817-01867.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210817-01867
PMID:34808751
Abstract

To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of state-dependent sodium channel blocker-bulleyaconitine combined with calcium channel blocker-gabapentin on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study involving Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University was performed from September 2018 to December 2019. A total of 75 PHN patients were randomly divided into the experiment group (=41) and the control group (=34). On the basis of first-line treatment with gabapentin, the experiment group was given bulleyaconitine A tablets, while the control group was given placebo. The primary outcome was a 50% improvement in the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the effective rate of achieving the primary outcome between the two groups was compared; the Cox regression model was used to analyze the impact of related factors on the disease outcome. Secondary outcomes including scores of pain scales (ID-pain, DN4), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 weeks after treatment were applied to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of bulleyaconitine A tablets with first-line drug in the treatment of PHN. The effective rate was 68.3% (28/41) and the time reached the primary outcome was 28 (7, 84) days in the experiment group, while in the control group, the effective rate was 52.9% (18/34) and the time reached the primary outcome was 56 (14, 84) days. Cox regression analysis indicated that the grouping factor of oral bulleyaconitine A tablets was an independent factor for improving the outcome of PHN (=2.063, 95%: 1.059-4.018, <0.05), and the probability of the experiment group reaching the primary outcome was 2.063 times that of the control group (<0.05). Meanwhile, the outcome probability of the long disease course group (>6 months) was only 0.201 times that of the short disease course group (<6 months) (=0.201, 95%: 0.073-0.551, <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the trend of VAS between the two groups (>0.05). The scores of ID-pain, DN4, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before enrollment (<0.05), but the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (all >0.05). Bulleyaconitine A tablet can promote the therapeutic efficacy of gabapentin, and improve the outcome of PHN in a short period of 3 months.

摘要

探讨状态依赖性钠通道阻滞剂—草乌甲素与钙通道阻滞剂—加巴喷丁联合应用于带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的镇痛疗效及安全性。于2018年9月至2019年12月开展了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、多中心研究,研究单位包括上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院、青海省人民医院、上海中医药大学附属岳阳中西医结合医院、昆明医科大学第二附属医院。共75例PHN患者被随机分为试验组(n = 41)和对照组(n = 34)。在加巴喷丁一线治疗基础上,试验组给予草乌甲素片,对照组给予安慰剂。主要结局为视觉模拟量表(VAS)改善50%,比较两组达到主要结局的有效率;采用Cox回归模型分析相关因素对疾病结局的影响。次要结局包括治疗后1、2、3、4、8、12周的疼痛量表(ID-疼痛、DN4)评分、患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表(GAD-7),用于评估草乌甲素片与一线药物联合治疗PHN的疗效和安全性。试验组有效率为68.3%(28/41),达到主要结局时间为28(7,84)天,而对照组有效率为52.9%(18/34),达到主要结局时间为56(14,84)天。Cox回归分析表明,口服草乌甲素片的分组因素是改善PHN结局的独立因素(HR = 2.063,95%CI:1.059 - 4.018,P < 0.05),试验组达到主要结局的概率是对照组的2.063倍(P < 0.05)。同时,病程长组(>6个月)的结局概率仅为病程短组(<6个月)的0.201倍(HR = 0.201,95%CI:0.073 - 0.551,P < 0.05)。两组VAS变化趋势差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组的ID-疼痛、DN4、PHQ-9和GAD-7评分与入组前相比均显著改善(P < 0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。草乌甲素片可提高加巴喷丁的治疗效果,并在3个月的短时间内改善PHN结局。

相似文献

1
[Clinical efficacy of bulleyaconitine A combined with gabapentin on postherpetic neuralgia].【草乌甲素联合加巴喷丁治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效】
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 23;101(43):3575-3580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210817-01867.
2
Gabapentin extended-release tablets for the treatment of patients with postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.用于治疗疱疹后神经痛患者的加巴喷丁控释片:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(11):765-76. doi: 10.2165/11539520-000000000-00000.
3
Efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil vs placebo in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and a pharmacokinetic comparison with oral gabapentin.加巴喷丁恩卡比啶对比安慰剂治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效:与口服加巴喷丁的药代动力学比较。
Pain Med. 2011 Jul;12(7):1098-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01139.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
4
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Different Frequencies for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的双盲、假刺激随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jul;22(4):E303-E313.
5
Different doses of gabapentin formulations for postherpetic neuralgia: A systematical review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同剂量加巴喷丁制剂治疗带状疱疹后神经痛:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 Feb;28(1):65-77. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2016.1163315. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with esketamine improves early depressive symptoms in patients with postherpetic neuralgia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.静脉患者自控镇痛用氯胺酮可改善带状疱疹后神经痛患者的早期抑郁症状:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06035-0.
7
Gabapentin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial.加巴喷丁治疗带状疱疹后神经痛:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 1998 Dec 2;280(21):1837-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.21.1837.
8
Efficacy of gabapentin for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia in patients with acute herpes zoster: A double blind, randomized controlled trial.加巴喷丁预防急性带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0217335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217335. eCollection 2019.
9
Gabapentin versus nortriptyline in post-herpetic neuralgia patients: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial--the GONIP Trial.加巴喷丁与去甲替林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛患者的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲临床试验——GONIP试验
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug;44(8):358-63. doi: 10.5414/cpp44358.
10
Efficacy and safety of gabapentin for treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.加巴喷丁治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 May;80(5):556-67. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.比较不同药物治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效和安全性:一项网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 30;16:1614587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1614587. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in treating acute herpetic neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia in the thoracic segment.脉冲射频治疗胸段急性带状疱疹神经痛和带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效比较
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 29;15:1425796. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1425796. eCollection 2024.
3
Therapeutic Strategies for Postherpetic Neuralgia: Mechanisms, Treatments, and Perspectives.
带状疱疹后神经痛的治疗策略:机制、治疗方法和展望。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Sep;27(9):307-319. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01146-x. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Neuropharmacological Potential of Diterpenoid Alkaloids.二萜生物碱的神经药理学潜力
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 14;16(5):747. doi: 10.3390/ph16050747.