Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02387-9.
To initiate fecal and oral collections in prospective cohort studies for microbial analyses, it is essential to understand how field conditions and geographic differences may impact microbial communities. This study aimed to investigate the impact of fecal and oral sample collection methods and room temperature storage on collection samples for studies of the human microbiota.
We collected fecal and oral samples from participants in two Iranian cohorts located in rural Yazd (n = 46) and urban Gonbad (n = 38) and investigated room temperature stability over 4 days of fecal (RNAlater and fecal occult blood test [FOBT] cards) and comparability of fecal and oral (OMNIgene ORAL kits and Scope mouthwash) collection methods. We calculated interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on 3 alpha and 4 beta diversity metrics and the relative abundance of 3 phyla. After 4 days at room temperature, fecal stability ICCs and ICCs for Scope mouthwash were generally high for all microbial metrics. Similarly, the fecal comparability ICCs for RNAlater and FOBT cards were high, ranging from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.75) for the relative abundance of Firmicutes to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) for unweighted Unifrac. Comparability ICCs for OMNIgene ORAL and Scope mouthwash were lower than fecal ICCs, ranging from 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.70) for the Shannon index to 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.86) for Bray-Curtis. Overall, RNAlater, FOBT cards and Scope mouthwash were stable up to 4 days at room temperature. Samples collected using FOBT cards were generally comparable to RNAlater while the OMNIgene ORAL were less similar to Scope mouthwash.
As microbiome measures for feces samples collected using RNAlater, FOBT cards and oral samples collected using Scope mouthwash were stable over four days at room temperature, these would be most appropriate for microbial analyses in these populations. However, one collection method should be consistently since each method may induce some differences.
为了在前瞻性队列研究中启动粪便和口腔收集,了解野外条件和地理差异如何影响微生物群落至关重要。本研究旨在调查粪便和口腔样本采集方法以及室温储存对人类微生物组研究采集样本的影响。
我们从位于伊朗农村亚兹德(n=46)和城市贡巴德(n=38)的两个伊朗队列中收集了粪便和口腔样本,并研究了粪便(RNAlater 和粪便潜血试验[FOBT]卡)在室温下 4 天的稳定性以及粪便和口腔(OMNIgene ORAL 试剂盒和 Scope 漱口水)采集方法的可比性。我们根据 3 种 alpha 和 4 种 beta 多样性指标以及 3 个门的相对丰度计算了组内相关系数(ICC)。在室温下放置 4 天后,粪便稳定性 ICC 和 Scope 漱口水的 ICC 通常对所有微生物指标都很高。同样,RNAlater 和 FOBT 卡的粪便可比性 ICC 也很高,从厚壁菌门相对丰度的 0.63(95%CI:0.46,0.75)到未加权 Unifrac 的 0.93(95%CI:0.89,0.96)。OMNIgene ORAL 和 Scope 漱口水的可比性 ICC 低于粪便 ICC,从 Shannon 指数的 0.55(95%CI:0.36,0.70)到 Bray-Curtis 的 0.79(95%CI:0.69,0.86)。总体而言,RNAlater、FOBT 卡和 Scope 漱口水在室温下可稳定 4 天。使用 FOBT 卡收集的样本通常与 RNAlater 相比具有可比性,而 OMNIgene ORAL 与 Scope 漱口水的相似性则较低。
由于使用 RNAlater、FOBT 卡收集的粪便样本和使用 Scope 漱口水收集的口腔样本的微生物测量值在室温下 4 天内保持稳定,因此这些方法最适合这些人群的微生物分析。然而,由于每种方法可能会引起一些差异,因此应始终使用一种采集方法。