NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Wiser Wounds, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Wiser Wounds, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
Prophylactic foam border dressings are recommended for high-risk patients in addition to standard pressure injury prevention protocols despite limited high-quality evidence regarding their effectiveness. This protocol describes the process evaluation that will be undertaken alongside a multisite randomised controlled trial investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these dressings in reducing hospital-acquired sacral pressure injury incidence.
This theory informed parallel process evaluation using qualitative and quantitative methods will be undertaken in medical and surgical units. To evaluate fidelity, recruitment, reach, dose delivered and received, and context, process data will include: research nurses' self-reported adherence to intervention protocols; semi-structured interviews with participants and research nurses and focus groups with nursing staff; participants' satisfaction and comfort with the dressings and perceived level of participation in pressure injury prevention; and nurses' attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. The proportion of the target population recruited, participant characteristics, and adherence to intervention protocols will be reported using descriptive statistics. Chi square or t-tests will compare differences in demographic characteristics between groups, and non-participants, and multivariate modelling will investigate potential moderators on the trial outcomes. Analysis of qualitative data will be guided by the Framework Method, which provides a clear, systematic process for developing themes.
This process evaluation will provide valuable insights into mechanisms of impact and contextual and moderating factors influencing trial outcomes. Process data will enhance reproducibility of the intervention and trustworthiness of findings, and inform clinicians, researchers, and policy makers about the extent to which foam border dressings can be feasibly implemented in clinical practice.
ACTRN12619000763145p.
尽管关于其有效性的高质量证据有限,但对于高危患者,除了标准的压疮预防方案外,还建议使用预防性泡沫边缘敷料。本方案描述了一项多中心随机对照试验的过程评估,该试验旨在研究这些敷料在降低医院获得性骶部压疮发生率方面的临床和成本效益。
本研究采用理论指导的平行过程评估,将使用定性和定量方法在医疗和外科病房进行。为了评估保真度、招募、覆盖范围、提供和接收的剂量以及背景,过程数据将包括:研究护士对干预方案的自我报告依从性;对参与者和研究护士进行半结构化访谈以及对护理人员进行焦点小组讨论;参与者对敷料的满意度和舒适度以及对压疮预防的参与感;以及护士对压疮预防的态度。将使用描述性统计报告招募的目标人群比例、参与者特征以及对干预方案的依从性。卡方检验或 t 检验将比较组间、非参与者之间的人口统计学特征差异,多元模型将调查试验结果的潜在调节因素。定性数据分析将遵循框架方法进行,该方法为开发主题提供了一个清晰、系统的过程。
该过程评估将提供有关影响机制和影响试验结果的背景和调节因素的有价值的见解。过程数据将提高干预措施的可重复性和研究结果的可信度,并为临床医生、研究人员和决策者提供有关泡沫边缘敷料在临床实践中可行实施的程度的信息。
ACTRN12619000763145p。