Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):e055176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055176.
There is evidence that disability acquisition causes a decline in mental health, but few studies have examined the causal mechanisms through which the effect operates. This study used a novel approach to mediation analysis to quantify interventional indirect effects (IIEs) through employment and income.
We used four waves of longitudinal data (2011-2014) from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, a nationally representative survey of Australian households.
Working aged individuals who acquired a disability (n=233) were compared with those who remained disability-free in all four waves (n=5419).
Self-reported mental health was measured using the Mental Health Inventory subscale of the Short Form 36 general health questionnaire, which measures symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological well-being.
We conducted a causal mediation analysis quantifying IIEs of disability acquisition on mental health operating through two distinct mediators: employment status and income. We used multiple imputation with 50 imputed datasets to account for missing data.
The total causal effect of disability acquisition on mental health was estimated to be a 4.8-point decline in mental health score (estimated mean difference: -4.8, 95% CI -7.0 to -2.7). The IIE through employment was estimated to be a 0.5-point difference (-0.5, 95% CI -1.0 to 0.0), accounting for 10.6% of the total effect, whereas there was no evidence that income explained any of the effects.
This study estimated that disability-related mental health inequalities could be reduced by 10.6% if employment rates were the same for people with disability as those without disability. The results suggest that employment is implicated in the relationship between disability acquisition and mental health and that more research is needed to understand the influence of other aspects of employment and other socioeconomic characteristics.
有证据表明,残疾的获得会导致心理健康状况下降,但很少有研究探讨导致这种影响的因果机制。本研究采用一种新的中介分析方法,通过就业和收入来量化干预间接效应(IIE)。
我们使用了来自澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(一项针对澳大利亚家庭的全国代表性调查)的四期纵向数据(2011-2014 年)。
在所有四个波次中获得残疾(n=233)的劳动年龄个体与那些一直无残疾的个体(n=5419)进行了比较。
使用简短形式 36 项一般健康问卷的心理健康量表子量表来衡量心理健康,该量表衡量抑郁、焦虑和心理幸福感的症状。
我们进行了因果中介分析,量化了残疾获得对心理健康的 IIE,该效应通过两个不同的中介变量运行:就业状况和收入。我们使用了 50 个插补数据集的多重插补来处理缺失数据。
残疾获得对心理健康的总因果效应估计为心理健康评分下降 4.8 分(估计平均差异:-4.8,95%CI-7.0 至-2.7)。通过就业产生的 IIE 估计为 0.5 分的差异(-0.5,95%CI-1.0 至 0.0),占总效应的 10.6%,而没有证据表明收入解释了任何效应。
如果残疾人和非残疾人的就业率相同,残疾相关的心理健康不平等可以减少 10.6%。结果表明,就业与残疾获得和心理健康之间存在关联,需要进一步研究以了解就业和其他社会经济特征的其他方面的影响。