Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton 3010, Victoria, Australia.
Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton 3010, Victoria, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115500. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115500. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Large inequalities in health and well-being exist between people with and without disability, in part due to poor socio-economic circumstances, and potentially also related to societal factors including issues associated with accessibility and participation. To better understand the contribution of societal factors, we used a unique longitudinal survey of disability in Great Britain to quantify the extent to which barriers to participation contribute to poorer health and well-being. We used data from 2354 individuals who participated in three waves of the Life Opportunities Survey between 2009 and 2014 and compared five health and well-being outcomes (self-rated health, anxiousness, life satisfaction, life worth, happiness) between adults who acquired an impairment and those who remained disability-free. Causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify how much of the effect of disability acquisition on each outcome was explained by barriers to participation in employment, economic life, transport, community, leisure and civic activities, social contact, and accessibility. People who recently acquired a disability had poorer health and well-being compared to people with no disability. Barriers to participation explained 15% of inequalities in self-rated health, 28% for anxiousness, 32% for life satisfaction, 37% for life worth, and 70% for happiness. A substantial proportion of the inequalities in health and well-being experienced by people with recently acquired disability were socially produced, driven by barriers to participation in different life domains. Furthermore, there was evidence that barriers to participation mediated the effect of well-being measured to a greater extent than the more clinically aligned measures, self-reported health and anxiousness. These findings highlight modifiable factors amenable to public health interventions that could lead to substantial improvements in health and well-being for people with disability.
在健康和福祉方面,残疾人和非残疾人之间存在着巨大的不平等,部分原因是社会经济条件较差,也可能与包括无障碍和参与相关问题在内的社会因素有关。为了更好地了解社会因素的贡献,我们使用了英国一项独特的残疾纵向调查来量化参与障碍对健康和福祉较差的影响程度。我们使用了 2009 年至 2014 年间参加生活机会调查三次的 2354 名个人的数据,并比较了在获得残疾和保持无残疾的成年人之间五种健康和福祉结果(自我评估健康、焦虑、生活满意度、生活价值、幸福)。进行因果中介分析,以量化残疾获得对每种结果的影响中有多少可以通过参与就业、经济生活、交通、社区、休闲和公民活动、社会接触和无障碍的障碍来解释。与没有残疾的人相比,最近获得残疾的人健康和幸福感较差。参与障碍解释了自我评估健康不平等的 15%,焦虑的 28%,生活满意度的 32%,生活价值的 37%,幸福的 70%。最近获得残疾的人在健康和幸福感方面的不平等很大程度上是由参与不同生活领域的障碍所造成的。此外,有证据表明,参与障碍对幸福感的影响比更符合临床的自我报告健康和焦虑的测量更为重要。这些发现强调了可通过公共卫生干预措施加以改变的因素,这些因素可能会使残疾人的健康和幸福感得到实质性改善。