Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Science, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):391-396. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_152_21.
To equivalence the perception of smile among laypersons, dental professionals and a commercially available popular smile designing software.
In vivo - comparative study.
A total of 72 participants within age range of 18-30 years were randomly selected with a natural permanent dentition. All the subjects underwent extra oral and intra oral photographic evaluation as per the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) guidelines. A total of 11 evaluators were selected for the study and were divided into four groups. The evaluation procedure comprised of assessment of patients' natural smile by laypersons, dental professionals and a smile designing software. A questionnaire was prepared for recording the responses which included a five-point Likert scale.
Data was statistically analysed using SPSS version 23. Frequencies and chi square test were done for intergroup comparison.
There was a statistically significant difference present in comparison across P < 0.05 all the groups.
There was significant difference in the perception of smile among evaluators and a smile designing software. Smile designing software prefers to modify the smile as per in built criteria and is more inclined towards creating an ideal smile.
比较普通人群、口腔专业人士和一款商业化的流行微笑设计软件对微笑的感知。
体内-对比研究。
共随机选择了 72 名年龄在 18-30 岁之间的自然恒牙患者。所有患者均按照美国美容牙科学会(AACD)指南进行了口腔外和口腔内摄影评估。选择了 11 名评估员进行研究,并将他们分为四组。评估程序包括普通人群、口腔专业人士和微笑设计软件对患者自然微笑的评估。准备了一份问卷来记录反应,其中包括 5 分李克特量表。
使用 SPSS 版本 23 进行数据分析。采用卡方检验进行组间比较。
所有组之间的比较 P<0.05 均有统计学差异。
评估者和微笑设计软件对微笑的感知存在显著差异。微笑设计软件倾向于根据内置标准修改微笑,并更倾向于创造理想的微笑。