Stephenson J B
Arch Dis Child. 1978 Mar;53(3):193-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.53.3.193.
From clinical history 58 children were diagnosed as having reflex anoxic seizures secondary to provoked cardioinhibition (also known as white breath-holding attacks). Before referral, these seizures were commonly misdiagnosed as epileptic either because the provocation was ignored, not recognised, or was a febrile illness, or because there was no crying, no obvious breath-holding, little cyanosis, and often no pallor to suggest syncope and cerebral ischaemia. The duration of cardiac asystole after ocular compression was measured in these children and in 60 additional children with other paroxysmal disorders. In 45 (78%) of the 58 with reflex anoxic seizures asystole was 2 seconds or over, and in 32 (55%) it was 4 seconds or greater, an abnormal response. Review of the literature supports the concept that these seizures result from vagal-mediated reflex cardiac arrest which can if necessary be prevented by atropine. The simple name 'vagal attack' is proposed. Ocular compression under EEG and ECG control supports the clinical diagnosis if asystole and/or an anoxic seizure is induced; the procedure described is safe and should be routine in seizure or syncope evaluation, when a meticulous history still leaves room for doubt.
根据临床病史,58名儿童被诊断为因诱发性心脏抑制继发反射性缺氧性惊厥(也称为白色屏气发作)。在转诊之前,这些惊厥通常被误诊为癫痫,原因要么是诱因被忽视、未被识别,要么是热性疾病,要么是因为没有哭闹、没有明显的屏气、几乎没有发绀,而且常常没有面色苍白提示晕厥和脑缺血。对这些儿童以及另外60名患有其他阵发性疾病的儿童测量了眼压迫后心脏停搏的持续时间。在58名反射性缺氧性惊厥儿童中,45名(78%)心脏停搏持续2秒或更长时间,32名(55%)持续4秒或更长时间,这是异常反应。文献回顾支持这样的概念,即这些惊厥是由迷走神经介导的反射性心脏骤停引起的,必要时可用阿托品预防。建议使用简单的名称“迷走神经发作”。在脑电图和心电图监测下进行眼压迫,如果诱发心脏停搏和/或缺氧性惊厥,则支持临床诊断;所描述的操作是安全的,在惊厥或晕厥评估中应作为常规操作,当详细的病史仍留有疑问时。