• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Use of Confidence Intervals in Interpreting Nonstatistically Significant Results.

作者信息

Hawkins Alexander T, Samuels Lauren R

机构信息

Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 Nov 23;326(20):2068-2069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16172.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2021.16172
PMID:34812882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9365504/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3380/9365504/1e2e5955ec4b/nihms-1826250-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3380/9365504/1e2e5955ec4b/nihms-1826250-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3380/9365504/1e2e5955ec4b/nihms-1826250-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Confidence Intervals in Interpreting Nonstatistically Significant Results.在解释无统计学显著性结果时使用置信区间。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 23;326(20):2068-2069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16172.
2
The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.在规划实验时使用预测置信区间以及在解释结果时对功效的误用。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Aug 1;121(3):200-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-3-199408010-00008.
3
Interpreting confidence intervals: A comment on Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014).解读置信区间：对霍克斯特拉、莫雷、鲁德和瓦根梅克斯（2014年）的评论
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):124-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0859-7.
4
When should non-significant results influence clinical decisions?: Interpreting confidence intervals.非显著结果何时应影响临床决策？：解读置信区间。
BJOG. 2020 Apr;127(5):548-549. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15548. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
[Interpreting a confidence interval].[解读置信区间]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2004 Feb;131(2):220. doi: 10.1016/s0151-9638(04)93579-x.
6
If almost nothing goes wrong, is almost everything all right? Interpreting small numerators.如果几乎没出差错，那几乎所有事都没问题吗？对小分子的解读
JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1013.
7
Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data.皮肤外科手术中的置信区间：一种直观的数据解读方法
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Apr;31(4):462-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31115.
8
Interpreting "null" results.解读“无”结果。
PM R. 2013 Jun;5(6):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.003.
9
Interpreting medical research results.解读医学研究结果。
Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):779. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90077-x.
10
Interpreting effects when comparing two interventions.比较两种干预措施时的效果解读。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;21(4):403-4. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2014.964468.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of glaucoma progression on longitudinal series of en-face macular optical coherence tomography angiography images with a deep learning model.利用深度学习模型对视盘光学相干断层扫描血管造影图像的纵向序列进行青光眼进展检测。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 22;108(12):1688-1693. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324528.
2
Effects of a work schedule with abated quick returns on insomnia, sleepiness, and work-related fatigue: results from a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.轮班制减少频繁倒班对失眠、嗜睡和与工作相关的疲劳的影响：一项大规模的群组随机对照试验结果。
Sleep. 2024 Jul 11;47(7). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsae086.
3
Smoking prevalence and purchasing of menthol cigarettes since the menthol flavour ban in Great Britain: a population-based survey between 2020 and 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Radioactive Iodine Administration After Reoperation With Outcomes Among Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Papillary Thyroid Cancer.放射性碘治疗在甲状腺癌患者二次手术后的应用与结局的相关性研究
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1098-1104. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2659.
2
Bayesian Analysis: Using Prior Information to Interpret the Results of Clinical Trials.贝叶斯分析：利用先验信息解读临床试验结果。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1605-1606. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15574.
3
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.
自英国薄荷醇口味禁令实施以来的吸烟率及薄荷醇香烟购买情况：2020年至2023年的一项基于人群的调查
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 12. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058390.
4
Association of random and observed urine drug screening with long-term retention in opioid treatment programs.随机和观察性尿液药物筛查与阿片类药物治疗项目长期保留的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Feb 1;255:111067. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111067. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
5
Inhaled ciclesonide in adults hospitalised with COVID-19: a randomised controlled open-label trial (HALT COVID-19).吸入用环索奈德治疗 COVID-19 成人住院患者的随机对照开放标签试验（HALT COVID-19）。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 22;13(2):e064374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064374.
6
Interpreting Results from Statistical Hypothesis Testing: Understanding the Appropriate P-value.解读统计假设检验的结果：理解合适的P值。
Phys Ther Res. 2022;25(2):49-55. doi: 10.1298/ptr.R0019. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Rapid growth in disposable e-cigarette vaping among young adults in Great Britain from 2021 to 2022: a repeat cross-sectional survey.2021 年至 2022 年期间，英国年轻人中一次性电子烟使用呈快速增长：一项重复横断面调查。
Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):382-386. doi: 10.1111/add.16044. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
8
Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation.我们为何以及如何应该从显著性检验转向估计。
J Evol Biol. 2022 Jun;35(6):777-787. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14009. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Impact of a Vendor-Developed Opioid Clinical Decision Support Intervention on Adherence to Prescribing Guidelines, Opioid Prescribing, and Rates of Opioid-Related Encounters.供应商开发的阿片类药物临床决策支持干预对遵医嘱、阿片类药物处方和阿片类药物相关就诊率的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):419-430. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745830. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能：误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
4
Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.最小临床重要差异：界定对患者真正重要的内容。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1342-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13128.
5
The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.在规划实验时使用预测置信区间以及在解释结果时对功效的误用。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Aug 1;121(3):200-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-3-199408010-00008.