Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada.
Assist Technol. 2023 May 4;35(3):211-219. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.2010149. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) is commonly used to assess the psychosocial effects of an assistive device. Given its growing use, an appraisal of the evidence regarding its psychometric properties is required. We conduct a systematic review using validated critical appraisal scales to analyze both the quality and content of the evidence on the psychometric properties of the PIADS. PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were systematically searched for identification of studies. Two independent reviewers appraised the retrieved studies using MacDermid and COSMIN-RoB checklists, and extracted data regarding the psychometric measurements reported. MacDermid scores showed that 8 out of 11 studies were, at least, of good methodological quality. COSMIN-RoB scores ranged from inadequate to very good. Except criterion and construct validity, which have presented a moderate level of evidence, the other psychometric properties assessed have demonstrated a high level of evidence. Cross-cultural validity, measurement error, and responsiveness have not been studied. Few studies have yet evaluated the psychometric properties of the PIADS. However, the quality of the evidence that they provide is mostly adequate. Therefore, this review supports the use of the PIADS, which has overall good psychometric properties.
辅助设备心理社会影响量表（PIADS）常用于评估辅助设备的心理社会影响。鉴于其使用日益广泛，需要对其心理测量学特性的证据进行评估。我们使用经过验证的关键评价量表进行系统评价，以分析 PIADS 心理测量特性的证据的质量和内容。我们通过 PubMed/Medline、Embase 和 CINAHL 系统地搜索了研究鉴定。两名独立的审查员使用 MacDermid 和 COSMIN-ROB 清单评估了检索到的研究，并提取了报告的心理测量学测量数据。MacDermid 评分显示，11 项研究中有 8 项至少具有良好的方法学质量。COSMIN-ROB 评分从不足到非常好不等。除了标准和结构有效性，它们呈现出中等水平的证据外，评估的其他心理测量特性表现出高度的证据。跨文化有效性、测量误差和反应性尚未研究。很少有研究评估过 PIADS 的心理测量学特性。然而，它们提供的证据质量大多是足够的。因此，本综述支持使用 PIADS，其具有整体良好的心理测量学特性。
