Suppr超能文献

吸烟对肩袖修补术后临床和结构结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effects of smoking on clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):656-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several factors have been reported to adversely affect clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, the effects of smoking on rotator cuff healing and clinical outcomes remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and structural outcomes after RCR between smokers and nonsmokers. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in the clinical scores after RCR and that smoking would be associated with a significantly increased risk of retear and reoperation.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We included only articles in which patients underwent arthroscopic and open RCR, the clinical outcome scores were reported for smokers and nonsmokers, and the number of rotator cuff retears and reoperations were reported. Data relevant to this study were extracted and statistically analyzed. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias in each study and calculated the I value to quantify the effect of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible articles were identified, with 73,817 participants (8553 smokers and 65,264 nonsmokers). The meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .10), Simple Shoulder Test score (P = .19), University of California-Los Angeles score (P = .09), or visual analog scale score (P = .19) between smokers and nonsmokers after surgery, but the Constant score was significantly lower (P = .005) for smokers. Smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk of retear (P = .002; risk ratio, 2.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.28]; I = 31%) and reoperation (P < .001; risk ratio, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.40]; I = 36%) in patients after RCR.

CONCLUSION

Besides the Constant score, which was lower in smokers, there were no significant differences in the clinical scores after RCR between smokers and nonsmokers. However, smoking was associated with a significantly increased risk of retear and reoperation.

摘要

背景

有多种因素被报道会对肩袖修复(RCR)后的临床和结构结果产生不利影响。然而,吸烟对肩袖愈合和临床结果的影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较 RCR 后吸烟者和非吸烟者的临床和结构结果。我们假设 RCR 后的临床评分没有显著差异,并且吸烟与肩袖再撕裂和再次手术的风险显著增加有关。

方法

本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,使用 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库。我们仅纳入了接受关节镜和开放 RCR 的患者,报告了吸烟者和非吸烟者的临床评分结果,以及肩袖再撕裂和再次手术的数量的文章。提取并对与本研究相关的数据进行了统计学分析。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)评估每个研究的偏倚风险,并计算 I 值来量化异质性的影响。

结果

确定了 14 篇符合条件的文章,共纳入 73817 名参与者(8553 名吸烟者和 65264 名非吸烟者)。荟萃分析表明,术后两组的美国肩肘外科医生评分(P=0.10)、简单肩测试评分(P=0.19)、加州大学洛杉矶分校评分(P=0.09)或视觉模拟评分(P=0.19)均无显著差异,但吸烟者的 Constant 评分明显较低(P=0.005)。吸烟与肩袖再撕裂(P=0.002;风险比,2.06[95%置信区间,1.30-3.28];I²=31%)和再次手术(P<0.001;风险比,1.29[95%置信区间,1.20-1.40];I²=36%)的风险显著增加相关。

结论

除了吸烟者的 Constant 评分较低外,RCR 后吸烟者和非吸烟者的临床评分没有显著差异。然而,吸烟与肩袖再撕裂和再次手术的风险显著增加有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验