Barrett Craig F, Davis Jerrold I, Leebens-Mack Jim, Conran John G, Stevenson Dennis W
L.H. Bailey Hortorium and Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia-Athens, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Cladistics. 2013 Feb;29(1):65-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00418.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
The commelinid monocots comprise the orders Arecales (A), Commelinales (C), Poales sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (APGIII) (P), Zingiberales (Z), plus the unplaced family Dasypogonaceae (D), collectively containing numerous economically and ecologically important species and encompassing enormous morphological diversity. Commelinids are supported as monophyletic based on anatomy and molecular data; however, relationships among major commelinid groupings conflict among previous studies, representing a long-standing problem in monocot systematics, with major implications for interpretations of character evolution. In more recent analyses, with whole-plastome sampling largely focused on Poales, areas of conflict remain, suggesting the need for closer investigation of relationships and support. Here, we increased sampling of plastomes among non-Poalean commelinid orders to investigate deep nodal support. Analysis of 83 plastid genes recovered relationships as ((A, D) (ZC, P)) with robust support, regardless of reconstruction method (parsimony/likelihood). However, conflict among genes was evident when grouped by genomic region. Cumulative analyses of genes ranked by decreasing numbers of informative characters indicated continued fluctuation in support, even as small genes were added to a nearly complete matrix, contrary to the expected pattern of stabilization in support. Topology tests among major commelinid groups suggested that the data were not powerful enough to reject all alternatives. This study provides clues to the limits of the plastid genome for resolving deep relationships among the commelinid monocots.
鸭跖草类单子叶植物包括棕榈目(A)、鸭跖草目(C)、被子植物系统发育组III(APGIII)定义下的禾本目(P)、姜目(Z),以及未确定位置的刺鳞草科(D),它们共同包含众多具有重要经济和生态意义的物种,形态多样性极为丰富。基于解剖学和分子数据,鸭跖草类植物被认为是单系类群;然而,先前的研究中主要鸭跖草类群之间的关系存在冲突,这是单子叶植物系统学中一个长期存在的问题,对性状进化的解释具有重要影响。在最近的分析中,由于全质体基因组取样主要集中在禾本目,冲突区域仍然存在,这表明需要更深入地研究其关系并提供支持。在此,我们增加了非禾本目鸭跖草类植物的质体基因组取样,以研究深层次节点的支持情况。对83个质体基因的分析得出的关系为((A, D) (ZC, P)),且支持力度很强,无论采用何种重建方法(简约法/似然法)。然而,按基因组区域分组时,基因之间的冲突很明显。对按信息特征数量递减排序的基因进行累积分析表明,即使将小基因添加到几乎完整的矩阵中,支持度仍持续波动,这与支持度稳定的预期模式相反。主要鸭跖草类群之间的拓扑结构测试表明,这些数据的说服力不足以排除所有其他可能性。本研究为质体基因组在解决鸭跖草类单子叶植物深层次关系方面的局限性提供了线索。