• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[广州新冠病例密切接触者核酸检测的敏感性和特异性]

[Sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid testing in close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Guangzhou].

作者信息

Zhang W T, Liu D, Xie C J, Shen D, Chen Z Q, Li Z H, Liu Y, Zhang X R, Chen P L, Zhong W F, Yang P, Huang Q M, Luo L, Mao C

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Guangzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 10;42(8):1347-1352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201211-01400.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201211-01400
PMID:34814552
Abstract

To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing in 20 348 close contacts of COVID-19 cases in different prevention and control stages in Guangzhou and to provide scientific evidence for optimizing epidemic response strategies. A total of 20 348 close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Guangzhou were traced between February 21 and September 22,2020. All the close contacts were tested for the nucleic acid of SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid testing and diagnosis in the different prevention and control stages were compared. In 20 348 close contacts, 12 462 were males (61.24%), the median (,) of age of them was 31.0 years (23.0,43.0), the median number (,) of nucleic acid testing for them was 2.0 (1.0,3.0), and the median (,) of their quarantine days was 12.0 (8.0,13.0) days, respectively. A total of 256 COVID-19 cases were confirmed in the close contacts after seven nucleic acid tests. In the 1, 2, 3 and 7 nucleic acid testing, the sensitivity and specificity were 69.14% and 99.99% (177 cases confirmed), 89.84% and 99.99% (230 cases confirmed), 97.27% and 99.99% (249 cases confirmed), and 100.00% and 99.98%, respectively. In the three stages of COVID-19 prevention and control in China: domestic case stage, imported case stage, and imported case associated local epidemic stage, the sensitivity of the 1 nucleic acid testing was 70.68%, 68.00% and 67.35%, and the specificity was 99.98%, 100.00% and 100.00%, respectively. The sensitivity of nucleic acid testing in the close contacts at the different stages were consistent with slight decrease, which might be related to the increased proportion of asymptomatic infections in the late stage of epidemic prevention and control with COVID-19 in Guangzhou. It is suggested to give three nucleic acid tests to improve the sensitivity and reduce false negative risk.

摘要

分析广州市不同防控阶段20348例新冠肺炎病例密切接触者中新型冠状病毒2019核酸检测的敏感性和特异性,为优化疫情应对策略提供科学依据。2020年2月21日至9月22日期间,共追踪了广州市20348例新冠肺炎病例密切接触者。对所有密切接触者进行新型冠状病毒2019核酸检测,比较不同防控阶段核酸检测及诊断的敏感性和特异性。在20348例密切接触者中,男性12462例(61.24%),年龄中位数为31.0岁(23.0,43.0),核酸检测次数中位数为2.0次(1.0,3.0),隔离天数中位数为12.0天(8.0,13.0)。经过7次核酸检测,密切接触者中共确诊256例新冠肺炎病例。在第1、2、3和7次核酸检测中,敏感性和特异性分别为69.14%和99.99%(确诊177例)、89.84%和99.99%(确诊230例)、97.27%和99.99%(确诊249例)、100.00%和99.98%。在中国新冠肺炎防控的三个阶段:本土病例阶段、输入病例阶段和输入病例关联本土疫情阶段,第1次核酸检测的敏感性分别为70.68%、68.00%和67.35%,特异性分别为99.98%、100.00%和100.00%。不同阶段密切接触者核酸检测的敏感性呈轻微下降趋势且具有一致性,这可能与广州新冠肺炎疫情防控后期无症状感染者比例增加有关。建议进行3次核酸检测以提高敏感性并降低假阴性风险。

相似文献

1
[Sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid testing in close contacts of COVID-19 cases in Guangzhou].[广州新冠病例密切接触者核酸检测的敏感性和特异性]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 10;42(8):1347-1352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201211-01400.
2
Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study.家庭二次感染 COVID-19 的发生率及其在中国广州的相关决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30471-0. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
[Epidemiological characteristics of three local epidemics of COVID-19 in Guangzhou].[广州新冠肺炎三次本土疫情的流行病学特征]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 10;42(12):2088-2095. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210728-00592.
4
Evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients.评估一种用于检测 COVID-19 患者无症状密切接触者中 SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测(Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag 快速检测设备)。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):636.e1-636.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
[Time distribution of positive nucleic acid detection in imported cases infected with SARS-CoV-2 in China].[中国输入性新型冠状病毒感染病例核酸检测阳性的时间分布]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 10;43(2):183-188. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20211108-00858.
6
A Cluster Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and the Prevention and Control Measures in the Early Stage of the Epidemic in Xi'an, China, 2020.2020 年中国西安 2019 冠状病毒病的聚集性传播及疫情初期的防控措施。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Jun 14;27:e929701. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929701.
7
[Contagiousness and secondary attack rate of 2019 novel coronavirus based on cluster epidemics of COVID-19 in Guangzhou].基于广州市新冠肺炎聚集性疫情的2019新型冠状病毒传染性及二代发病率
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 10;41(10):1623-1626. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200310-00305.
8
[Analysis on infectivity of COVID-19 patients before and after last negative nucleic acid test].
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 10;43(6):841-845. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220301-00164.
9
[Epidemiological characteristics of close contacts of COVID-19 cases and infection-related risk factors in Beijing].
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 10;42(10):1757-1762. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210419-00324.
10
[Effectiveness of the "14 plus 7 day quarantine" and "nucleic acid plus total antibody testing" strategy for screening imported patients with COVID-19 in Xiamen].["“14+7天隔离”与“核酸+总抗体检测”策略在厦门筛查新冠肺炎输入病例中的效果"]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 10;42(6):1002-1007. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210128-00076.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective multidimensional approach for practical management of the emergency department in a COVID-19 designated children's hospital in east China during the Omicron pandemic: a cross-sectional study.华东地区一家新冠肺炎定点儿童医院在奥密克戎疫情期间急诊科实际管理的有效多维度方法:一项横断面研究
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):113-124. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-314. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Effects of contact tracing and nucleic acid testing on the COVID-19 outbreak in Zunyi, China: data-driven study using a branching process model.遵义市基于分支过程模型的传染病接触者追踪和核酸检测对 COVID-19 疫情影响的数据分析研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07967-2.
3
Infection rate and factors affecting close contacts of COVID-19 cases: A systematic review.
新冠病毒病例密切接触者的感染率及影响因素:系统评价。
J Evid Based Med. 2022 Dec;15(4):385-397. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12508. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Quantitative assessment of the effects of massive nucleic acid testing in controlling a COVID-19 outbreak.大规模核酸检测在控制 COVID-19 疫情中的效果的定量评估。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07816-2.
5
Epidemiological Characteristics and Transmissibility for SARS-CoV-2 of Population Level and Cluster Level in a Chinese City.中国城市人群水平和集群水平的 SARS-CoV-2 的流行病学特征和传播性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;9:799536. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.799536. eCollection 2021.
6
Computed tomography-positive, SARS-CoV-2 RNA-negative symptomatic contacts of COVID-19 patients: what are their nature and implications?新冠病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者计算机断层扫描呈阳性、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)RNA呈阴性的有症状密切接触者:其本质和影响是什么?
Future Virol. 2021 Sep. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2021-0205. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
Swab and Sputum SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Negative, CT-Positive, Symptomatic Contacts of COVID-19 Cases: A Hypothesis-Generating Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study of Eight Clusters.新冠病毒病例的咽拭子和痰液SARS-CoV-2 RNA阴性、CT阳性且有症状的密切接触者:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,针对八个集群提出假设。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 17;8:685544. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.685544. eCollection 2021.