Suppr超能文献

前外侧与前前后后电极位置为心房颤动。

Anterior-Lateral Versus Anterior-Posterior Electrode Position for Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., H.R., B.L.).

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (A.S.S., K.G.L., B.L.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2021 Dec 21;144(25):1995-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056301. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smaller randomized studies have reported conflicting results regarding the optimal electrode position for cardioverting atrial fibrillation. However, anterior-posterior electrode positioning is widely used as a standard and believed to be superior to anterior-lateral electrode positioning. Therefore, we aimed to compare anterior-lateral and anterior-posterior electrode positioning for cardioverting atrial fibrillation in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS

In this multicenter, investigator-initiated, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for elective cardioversion to either anterior-lateral or anterior-posterior electrode positioning. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm after the first shock. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm after up to 4 shocks escalating to maximum energy. Safety outcomes were any cases of arrhythmia during or after cardioversion, skin redness, and patient-reported periprocedural pain.

RESULTS

We randomized 468 patients. The primary outcome occurred in 126 patients (54%) assigned to the anterior-lateral electrode position and in 77 patients (33%) assigned to the anterior-posterior electrode position (risk difference, 22 percentage points [95% CI, 13-30]; <0.001). The number of patients in sinus rhythm after the final cardioversion shock was 216 (93%) assigned to anterior-lateral electrode positioning and 200 (85%) assigned to anterior-posterior electrode positioning (risk difference, 7 percentage points [95% CI, 2-12]). There were no significant differences between groups in any safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior-lateral electrode positioning was more effective than anterior-posterior electrode positioning for biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. There were no significant differences in any safety outcome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03817372.

摘要

背景

较小的随机研究报告了关于心房颤动转复的最佳电极位置的相互矛盾的结果。然而,前后电极定位被广泛用作标准,并且被认为优于前外侧电极定位。因此,我们旨在比较多中心随机试验中用于心房颤动转复的前外侧和前后电极定位。

方法

在这项多中心、研究者发起的、开放标签试验中,我们将计划进行择期电复律的心房颤动患者随机分配到前外侧或前后电极定位。主要结局是首次电击后窦性心律患者的比例。次要结局是最多电击 4 次增加至最大能量后窦性心律患者的比例。安全性结局为电复律过程中或之后的任何心律失常、皮肤发红和患者报告的围手术期疼痛。

结果

我们随机分配了 468 名患者。前外侧电极位置组有 126 名(54%)患者和前后电极位置组有 77 名(33%)患者发生主要结局(风险差异,22 个百分点[95%CI,13-30];<0.001)。最后一次电击后窦性心律的患者数量为前外侧电极位置组 216 名(93%)和前后电极位置组 200 名(85%)(风险差异,7 个百分点[95%CI,2-12])。两组在任何安全性结局方面均无显著差异。

结论

对于双相心房颤动转复,前外侧电极定位比前后电极定位更有效。任何安全性结局均无显著差异。

登记信息

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT03817372。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验