Biomarkers and Research, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev Hovedgade 205-207, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01684-3.
Remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is a central mechanism in the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and remodeling of type VI collagen has been suggested to be associated with disease progression. Biomarkers that reflect and predict the progression of IPF would provide valuable information for clinicians when treating IPF patients.
Two serological biomarkers reflecting formation (PRO-C6) and degradation (C6M) of type VI collagen were evaluated in a real-world cohort of 178 newly diagnoses IPF patients. All patients were treatment naïve at the baseline visit. Blood samples and clinical data were collected from baseline, six months, and 12 months visit. The biomarkers were measured by competitive ELISA using monoclonal antibodies.
Patients with progressive disease had higher (P = 0.0099) serum levels of PRO-C6 compared to those with stable disease over 12 months with an average difference across all timepoints of 12% (95% CI 3-22), whereas C6M levels tended (P = 0.061) to be higher in patients with progressive disease compared with stable patients over 12 months with an average difference across all timepoints of 12% (95% CI - 0.005-27). Patients who did not receive antifibrotic medicine had a greater increase of C6M (P = 0.043) compared to treated patients from baseline over 12 months with an average difference across all timepoints of 12% (95% CI - 0.07-47). There were no differences in biomarker levels between patients receiving pirfenidone or nintedanib.
Type VI collagen formation was related to progressive disease in patients with IPF in a real-world cohort and antifibrotic therapy seemed to affect the degradation of type VI collagen. Type VI collagen formation and degradation products might be potential biomarkers for disease progression in IPF.
细胞外基质(ECM)的重塑是特发性肺纤维化(IPF)进展的核心机制,并且已经提出类型 VI 胶原的重塑与疾病进展相关。反映和预测 IPF 进展的生物标志物将为治疗 IPF 患者的临床医生提供有价值的信息。
在一个 178 名新诊断的 IPF 患者的真实队列中,评估了两种反映形成(PRO-C6)和降解(C6M)的血清生物标志物。所有患者在基线就诊时均为治疗初治。从基线、6 个月和 12 个月就诊时采集血样和临床数据。使用单克隆抗体通过竞争性 ELISA 测量生物标志物。
与 12 个月内稳定的患者相比,进展性疾病患者的 PRO-C6 血清水平更高(P = 0.0099),所有时间点的平均差异为 12%(95%CI 3-22),而 C6M 水平在 12 个月内进展性疾病患者中倾向于(P = 0.061)高于稳定患者,所有时间点的平均差异为 12%(95%CI -0.005-27)。与接受抗纤维化药物治疗的患者相比,未接受抗纤维化药物治疗的患者从基线到 12 个月时 C6M 的增加更大(P = 0.043),所有时间点的平均差异为 12%(95%CI -0.07-47)。接受吡非尼酮或尼达尼布治疗的患者的生物标志物水平没有差异。
在真实队列中,IPF 患者的类型 VI 胶原形成与进行性疾病相关,抗纤维化治疗似乎影响类型 VI 胶原的降解。类型 VI 胶原形成和降解产物可能是 IPF 疾病进展的潜在生物标志物。