Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
TechEd Consultants, Mason, Michigan.
Respir Care. 2022 Jun;67(6):702-708. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09518. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Although quality control standards are recommended to ensure accurate test results, the coefficient of variation for the FVC and FEV biologic quality control (BioQC) is not specified. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate variations in spirometry BioQCs in a large and diverse cohort of individuals to determine an acceptable standard for the coefficient of variation.
The FVC and FEV biologic control data were secondary analyses from an inhaled medication trial that was conducted over 3 y ending in 2018 that included 114 laboratories. Results were sent to a central repository for expert review. The FVC and FEV coefficients of variation were based upon a minimum of 10 spirometry values annually separated by at least 5 d. A second method of computing the coefficient of variation used 10 values within 28 d. Descriptive statistics were computed. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted to compare whether the median coefficient of variation values between the 2 methods differed, tested at α = 0.05 using SPSS.
Of 249 biologic control participants, 170 met the first year's inclusion criteria. The coefficient of variation for the 5-d separated method was < 5% for 94.1% of FVC and 93.5% of FEV values in the first year. By year 3, 90% of FVC and FEV coefficient of variation values were < 4%. The medians for the 5-d separated and the 28-d measure showed no difference for either FVC coefficient of variation or FEV coefficient of variation, = -1.764, = .78, and = -0.980, = .33, respectively.
Interlab biologic control variation values of < 4% for FVC and FEV are achievable; however, individual labs should strive to attain lower values. Acceptable coefficients of variation can be achieved within 28 d.
尽管推荐了质量控制标准以确保准确的测试结果,但 FVC 和 FEV 生物学质量控制(BioQC)的变异系数并未具体说明。本研究的主要目的是评估大量不同个体的肺活量计 BioQC 中的变化,以确定可接受的变异系数标准。
FVC 和 FEV 生物控制数据是一项吸入药物试验的二次分析结果,该试验于 2018 年结束,历时 3 年,包括 114 个实验室。结果被送到一个中央存储库进行专家审查。FVC 和 FEV 的变异系数是基于每年至少 10 次肺活量计值,且至少相隔 5 天得出的。计算变异系数的第二种方法是在 28 天内使用 10 个值。计算了描述性统计数据。使用 SPSS 以 α = 0.05 进行 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,以比较两种方法之间的中位数变异系数值是否存在差异。
在 249 名生物对照参与者中,有 170 名符合第一年的纳入标准。在第一年,94.1%的 FVC 和 93.5%的 FEV 值的 5 天分离方法的变异系数<5%。到第 3 年,90%的 FVC 和 FEV 变异系数值<4%。5 天分离和 28 天测量的中位数对于 FVC 变异系数或 FEV 变异系数均无差异,= -1.764,=.78,= -0.980,=.33。
FVC 和 FEV 的实验室间生物学控制变化值<4%是可以实现的;但是,各个实验室应努力达到更低的值。可接受的变异系数可以在 28 天内达到。