• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机牙科摄影在美学分析中的评估

Evaluation of smartphone dental photography in aesthetic analysis.

作者信息

Lazar Radu, Culic Bogdan, Gasparik Cristina, Lazar Camelia, Dudea Diana

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Dental Private Practice, Gherla, Romania.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2021 Nov 23. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3619-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41415-021-3619-2
PMID:34815481
Abstract

Aims To investigate the influence of the system used for digital photography upon the aesthetic analysis in dental medicine.Materials and methods The aesthetic parameters were evaluated on photographs taken with different systems: two DSLR camera set-ups (DSLR + ring flash and DSLR + twin flash) and a smartphone-based system using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire.Results Generally, the DSLR camera + twin flash photographic method performed the best with an overall average score of 4.3, receiving the highest scores for eight statements included in the questionnaire, followed by the smartphone-based system with an average score of 4.04 (the highest values for three statements) and DSLR camera + ring flash with an average score of 3.92 (the highest values for four statements). The scores recorded for the images taken with the DSLR camera + twin flash, DSLR camera + ring flash and smartphone-based system were significantly different for each statement (p <0.05).Conclusions When analysing the characteristics of the dental arches and of individual teeth, images taken with the DSLR camera and twin flash photographic method received the best evaluation, while for the examination of the dentofacial relations and the gingival characteristics, the images obtained with the DSLR camera and ring flash setting, respectively, with the smartphone-based system were considered optimal.

摘要

目的 研究数码摄影系统对牙科美学分析的影响。

材料与方法 使用五点李克特量表问卷,对用不同系统拍摄的照片的美学参数进行评估:两种数码单反相机设置(数码单反相机+环形闪光灯和数码单反相机+双闪光灯)以及一个基于智能手机的系统。

结果 总体而言,数码单反相机+双闪光灯摄影方法表现最佳,总平均分4.3,在问卷包含的八项陈述中得分最高,其次是基于智能手机的系统,平均分为4.04(三项陈述得分最高),数码单反相机+环形闪光灯平均分为3.92(四项陈述得分最高)。数码单反相机+双闪光灯、数码单反相机+环形闪光灯和基于智能手机的系统拍摄的图像在每项陈述上的得分均有显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论 在分析牙弓和单颗牙齿的特征时,数码单反相机和双闪光灯摄影方法拍摄的图像得到的评价最佳,而在检查牙面关系和牙龈特征时,分别使用数码单反相机和环形闪光灯设置拍摄的图像以及基于智能手机的系统拍摄的图像被认为是最佳的。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of smartphone dental photography in aesthetic analysis.智能手机牙科摄影在美学分析中的评估
Br Dent J. 2021 Nov 23. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3619-2.
2
Margin Reflex Distance: Differences Based on Camera and Flash Positions.边缘反射距离:基于摄像头和闪光灯位置的差异
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):199-203. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000456.
3
The Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Instrumental Techniques: An In Vitro Study.使用不同仪器技术进行牙齿颜色选择的准确性和可靠性:一项体外研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;21(22):7490. doi: 10.3390/s21227490.
4
Perfect Lighting for Facial Photography in Aesthetic Surgery: Ring Light.美容手术中面部摄影的完美照明:环形灯。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Apr;40(2):319-26. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0614-0. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
In Vitro Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Digital Instruments.使用不同数字仪器进行牙齿比色准确性和可靠性的体外评估
Cureus. 2024 Jan 16;16(1):e52363. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52363. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
[Application and exploration of Smile Lite MDP portable photography system in aesthetic photography of anterior teeth].[Smile Lite MDP便携式摄影系统在前牙美学摄影中的应用与探索]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Feb 18;52(1):187-192. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.030.
7
Focus distance estimation from photographed faces: a test of PerspectiveX using 1709 frontal and profile photographs from DSLR and smartphone cameras.从拍摄的人脸估计焦距:使用单反和智能手机拍摄的 1709 张正面和侧面照片对 PerspectiveX 的测试。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Nov;137(6):1907-1920. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03078-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
8
The use of digital dental photography in an Eastern European country.数字牙科摄影在一个东欧国家的应用。
Med Pharm Rep. 2022 Jul;95(3):305-310. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2119. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
9
The iPhone, the reflex, and the vinyl record: is the smartphone taking the best intraoperative photographs?iPhone、条件反射和黑胶唱片:智能手机能拍出最好的术中照片吗?
J Vis Commun Med. 2021 Oct;44(4):151-156. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2021.1951601. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
Accuracy of Dental Photography: Professional vs. Smartphone's Camera.口腔摄影的准确性:专业相机与智能手机相机的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Dec 15;2021:3910291. doi: 10.1155/2021/3910291. eCollection 2021.