Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA, School of Dentistry, Dental Materials Laboratory, Belém - PA, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Nov 19;35:e113. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0113. eCollection 2021.
The ultrastructural and mechanical properties of enamel surface were evaluated after prolonged bleaching treatments with 10% carbamide peroxide in the presence or absence of orange juice (erosive challenge) and toothbrushing (abrasive challenge). In total, 145 incisor bovine teeth were used in this study. Twenty-five samples were prepared for the ultrastructural evaluations, and 120 samples were prepared for microhardness and roughness tests. These 120 samples were divided into eight experimental groups (n = 15): G1- artificial saliva; G2- abrasion; G3- erosion; G4- dental bleaching; G5- erosion + abrasion; G6- bleaching + abrasion; G7- bleaching + erosion; and G8- bleaching + erosion + abrasion. All groups were tested at T0 (before treatment), T1 (14 days), T2 (21 days), and T3 (28 days). Two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures and the post hoc Sidak tests (p ≤ 0.05) were used. The roughness evaluation demonstrated an increase in damage for all experimental groups with an increase in the time period. For microhardness, the groups exposed to artificial saliva (AS) and abrasive challenge did not show any differences at any time points, while the other groups showed a decrease in microhardness from T0 to T3. Ultrastructural evaluation showed different surface alterations in response to the treatments. Despite prolonged bleaching periods, the procedure caused lesser enamel surface alterations than exposure to orange juice alone or in combination with brushing.
研究评估了在含有 10%过氧脲的漂白处理后,橙汁(侵蚀性挑战)和刷牙(磨损性挑战)存在与否对牙釉质表面的超微结构和机械性能的影响。本研究共使用了 145 颗切牙牛牙。25 个样本用于超微结构评估,120 个样本用于显微硬度和粗糙度测试。这 120 个样本分为 8 个实验组(n = 15):G1-人工唾液;G2-磨损;G3-侵蚀;G4-牙齿漂白;G5-侵蚀+磨损;G6-漂白+磨损;G7-漂白+侵蚀;G8-漂白+侵蚀+磨损。所有组均在 T0(治疗前)、T1(14 天)、T2(21 天)和 T3(28 天)进行测试。采用重复测量的双向方差分析和事后 Sidak 检验(p≤0.05)。粗糙度评估显示,所有实验组的损伤随时间的增加而增加。对于显微硬度,暴露于人工唾液(AS)和磨损性挑战的组在任何时间点均未显示出任何差异,而其他组则显示出从 T0 到 T3 的显微硬度下降。超微结构评估显示,不同的处理方式导致牙釉质表面出现不同的变化。尽管漂白时间延长,但与单独接触橙汁或与刷牙结合相比,该程序对牙釉质表面的改变较小。