Steineman Brett D, LaPrade Robert F, Haut Donahue Tammy L
Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021.
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN 55435.
J Biomech Eng. 2022 May 1;144(5). doi: 10.1115/1.4053100.
Meniscal root repairs are susceptible to unrecoverable loosening that may displace the meniscus from the initial position reduced during surgery. Despite this, the effects of a loosened meniscal root repair on knee mechanics are unknown. We hypothesized that anatomic root repairs without loosening would restore knee mechanics to the intact condition better than loosened anatomic root repairs, but that loosened repairs would restore mechanics better than untreated meniscal root tears. Finite element knee models were used to evaluate changes in cartilage and meniscus mechanics due to repair loosening. The mechanical response from loosened anatomic root repairs was compared to anatomic repairs without loosening and untreated root tears. All conditions were evaluated at three flexion angles, 0 deg, 30 deg, and 60 deg, and a compressive force of 1000 N to simulate return-to-activity loading. The two-simple suture method was represented within the models to simulate posteromedial meniscal root repairs and the loosening of repairs was derived from previous biomechanical experimental data. Loosening decreased hoop stresses throughout the meniscus, increased posterior extrusion, and shifted loading through the meniscus-cartilage region to the cartilage-cartilage region compared to the anatomic root repair without loosening. Despite differences between repairs and loosened repairs, the changes from loosened repairs more closely resembled the anatomic repair without loosening than the untreated root repair condition. Therefore, meniscal root repairs are susceptible to loosening that will prevent a successful initial repair from remaining in the intended position and will alter cartilage and meniscus mechanics, although repairs that loosen appear better than leaving tears untreated.
半月板根部修复容易出现无法恢复的松动,这可能会使半月板从手术中复位的初始位置发生移位。尽管如此,半月板根部修复松动对膝关节力学的影响尚不清楚。我们假设,无松动的解剖学根部修复比松动的解剖学根部修复能更好地将膝关节力学恢复到完整状态,但松动的修复比未治疗的半月板根部撕裂能更好地恢复力学。使用有限元膝关节模型来评估由于修复松动导致的软骨和半月板力学变化。将松动的解剖学根部修复的力学响应与无松动的解剖学修复和未治疗的根部撕裂进行比较。所有情况均在三个屈曲角度(0°、30°和60°)以及1000 N的压缩力下进行评估,以模拟恢复活动时的负荷。模型中采用双简单缝合方法来模拟后内侧半月板根部修复,修复的松动源自先前的生物力学实验数据。与无松动的解剖学根部修复相比,松动会降低整个半月板的环向应力,增加后向挤压,并使通过半月板 - 软骨区域的负荷转移到软骨 - 软骨区域。尽管修复与松动修复之间存在差异,但松动修复的变化与无松动的解剖学修复相比,比未治疗的根部修复情况更相似。因此,半月板根部修复容易出现松动,这将阻止成功的初始修复保持在预期位置,并会改变软骨和半月板力学,尽管松动的修复似乎比不治疗撕裂更好。