• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估激励措施对临床试验参与的影响:一项混合方法的社区参与研究方案

Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on Clinical Trial Participation: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Community-Engaged Study.

作者信息

Galea Jerome T, Greene Karah Y, Nguyen Brandon, Polonijo Andrea N, Dubé Karine, Taylor Jeff, Christensen Christopher, Zhang Zhiwei, Brown Brandon

机构信息

School of Social Work, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.

College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 23;10(11):e33608. doi: 10.2196/33608.

DOI:10.2196/33608
PMID:34817381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monetary incentives in research are frequently used to support participant recruitment and retention. However, there are scant empirical data regarding how researchers decide upon the type and amount of incentives offered. Likewise, there is little guidance to assist study investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) in their decision-making on incentives. Monetary incentives, in addition to other factors such as the risk of harm or other intangible benefits, guide individuals' decisions to enroll in research studies. These factors emphasize the need for evidence-informed guidance for study investigators and IRBs when determining the type and amount of incentives to provide to research participants.

OBJECTIVE

The specific aims of our research project are to (1) characterize key stakeholders' views on and assessments of incentives in biomedical HIV research; (2) reach consensus among stakeholders on the factors that are considered when choosing research incentives, including consensus on the relative importance of such factors; and (3) pilot-test the use of the guidance developed via aims 1 and 2 by presenting stakeholders with vignettes of hypothetical research studies for which they will choose corresponding incentive types.

METHODS

Our 2-year study will involve monthly, active engagement with a stakeholder advisory board of people living with HIV, researchers, and IRB members. For aim 1, we will conduct a nationwide survey (N=300) among people living with HIV to understand their views regarding the incentives used in HIV research. For aim 2, we will collect qualitative data by conducting focus groups with people living with HIV (n=60) and key informant interviews with stakeholders involved in HIV research (people living with HIV, IRB members, and biomedical HIV researchers: n=36) to extend and deepen our understanding of how incentives in HIV research are perceived. These participants will also complete a conjoint analysis experiment to gain an understanding of the relative importance of key HIV research study attributes and the impact that these attributes have on study participation. The data from the nationwide survey (aim 1) will be triangulated with the qualitative and conjoint analysis data (aim 2) to create 25 vignettes that describe hypothetical HIV research studies. Finally, individuals from each stakeholder group will select the most appropriate incentive that they feel should be used in each of the 25 vignettes (aim 3).

RESULTS

The stakeholder advisory board began monthly meetings in March 2021. All study aims are expected to be completed by December 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

By studying the role of incentives in HIV clinical trial participation, we will establish a decision-making paradigm to guide the choice of incentives for HIV research and, eventually, other types of similar research and facilitate the ethical recruitment of clinical research participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04809636; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04809636.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/33608.

摘要

背景

研究中的金钱激励经常被用于支持参与者的招募和留存。然而,关于研究人员如何决定所提供激励的类型和金额,实证数据却很少。同样,在协助研究调查人员和机构审查委员会(IRB)进行激励决策方面,几乎没有相关指导。金钱激励,连同其他因素,如伤害风险或其他无形利益,会影响个人参与研究的决定。这些因素强调了在确定向研究参与者提供的激励类型和金额时,需要为研究调查人员和IRB提供基于证据的指导。

目的

我们研究项目的具体目标是:(1)描述关键利益相关者对生物医学HIV研究中激励措施的看法和评估;(2)使利益相关者就选择研究激励措施时考虑的因素达成共识,包括这些因素相对重要性的共识;(3)通过向利益相关者展示假设研究的 vignette,让他们选择相应的激励类型,对通过目标1和2制定的指导进行试点测试。

方法

我们为期2年的研究将每月与一个由HIV感染者、研究人员和IRB成员组成的利益相关者咨询委员会进行积极互动。对于目标1,我们将在全国范围内对HIV感染者进行调查(N = 300),以了解他们对HIV研究中使用的激励措施的看法。对于目标2,我们将通过与HIV感染者进行焦点小组讨论(n = 60)以及与参与HIV研究的利益相关者(HIV感染者、IRB成员和生物医学HIV研究人员:n = 36)进行关键信息访谈来收集定性数据,以扩展和深化我们对HIV研究中激励措施如何被认知的理解。这些参与者还将完成一项联合分析实验,以了解HIV研究关键属性的相对重要性以及这些属性对研究参与的影响。来自全国性调查(目标1)的数据将与定性和联合分析数据(目标2)进行三角验证,以创建25个描述假设HIV研究的 vignette。最后,每个利益相关者群体的个体将为25个 vignette中的每一个选择他们认为最合适的激励措施(目标3)。

结果

利益相关者咨询委员会于2021年3月开始每月举行会议。预计所有研究目标将于2022年12月完成。

结论

通过研究激励措施在HIV临床试验参与中的作用,我们将建立一个决策范式,以指导HIV研究以及最终其他类似研究类型的激励措施选择,并促进临床研究参与者的伦理招募。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04809636;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04809636。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/33608。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/8663586/8aa928ba0f12/resprot_v10i11e33608_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/8663586/8aa928ba0f12/resprot_v10i11e33608_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/8663586/8aa928ba0f12/resprot_v10i11e33608_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on Clinical Trial Participation: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Community-Engaged Study.评估激励措施对临床试验参与的影响:一项混合方法的社区参与研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 23;10(11):e33608. doi: 10.2196/33608.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Need to Track Payment Incentives to Participate in HIV Research.追踪参与艾滋病研究的支付激励措施的必要性。
IRB. 2018 Jul-Aug;40(4):8-12.
5
Providing Unique Support for Health Study Among Young Black and Latinx Men Who Have Sex With Men and Young Black and Latinx Transgender Women Living in 3 Urban Cities in the United States: Protocol for a Coach-Based Mobile-Enhanced Randomized Control Trial.为美国三个城市中与男性发生性关系的年轻黑人和拉丁裔男性以及年轻黑人和拉丁裔跨性别女性的健康研究提供独特支持:基于教练的移动增强随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 16;9(9):e17269. doi: 10.2196/17269.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Advancing patient-centered research practices in a pragmatic patient-level randomized clinical trial: A thematic analysis of stakeholder engagement in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA).在一项实用的患者层面随机临床试验中推进以患者为中心的研究实践:对急诊医学姑息治疗准入(EMPallA)中利益相关者参与情况的主题分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 23;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00539-x.
8
9
Patient Education and Decision Support for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Protocol for Tool Development and Pilot Testing with Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Medical Case Management Programs in New York.长效注射用抗逆转录病毒疗法的患者教育与决策支持:纽约州瑞安·怀特艾滋病病毒/艾滋病项目医疗病例管理项目的工具开发与试点测试方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 27;13:e56892. doi: 10.2196/56892.
10
Incentives and Reminders to Improve Long-term Medication Adherence (INMIND): Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.改善长期药物依从性的激励与提醒措施(INMIND):一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 31;11(10):e42216. doi: 10.2196/42216.

引用本文的文献

1
A Penny for Your Thoughts? Moving Research Payment Transparency from Idiom to Policy.想听听你的想法?将研究报酬透明度从习语转化为政策。
NAM Perspect. 2023 May 17;2023. doi: 10.31478/202305a. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A Call for Radical Transparency regarding Research Payments.呼吁在研究经费支付方面实现彻底透明。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(3):45-47. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1870763.
2
Comparing Payments Between Sociobehavioral and Biomedical Studies in a Large Research University in Southern California.比较加利福尼亚南部一所大型研究型大学中社会行为学和生物医学研究之间的支付情况。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Feb-Apr;16(1-2):117-124. doi: 10.1177/1556264620987773. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
The Need to Track Payment Incentives to Participate in HIV Research.
追踪参与艾滋病研究的支付激励措施的必要性。
IRB. 2018 Jul-Aug;40(4):8-12.
4
A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants.研究参与者伦理支付框架。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):766-771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1710591.
5
Financial Incentives for Linkage to Care and Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial (HPTN 065).针对HIV阳性患者接受治疗及病毒抑制的经济激励措施:一项随机临床试验(HPTN 065)
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1083-1092. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2158.
6
Willingness to participate and take risks in HIV cure research: survey results from 400 people living with HIV in the US.参与艾滋病治愈研究并承担风险的意愿:来自美国400名艾滋病病毒感染者的调查结果
J Virus Erad. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):40-50.e21. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30295-8.
7
Transparency of participant incentives in HIV research.艾滋病病毒研究中参与者激励措施的透明度。
Lancet HIV. 2016 Oct;3(10):e456-7. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30150-3.
8
Recruitment and ethical considerations in HIV cure trials requiring treatment interruption.在需要中断治疗的 HIV 治愈试验中招募参与者和考虑伦理问题。
J Virus Erad. 2015 Jan 1;1(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)31148-1.
9
For love and money: the need to rethink benefits in HIV cure studies.为了爱与金钱:在艾滋病治愈研究中重新思考益处的必要性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):96-99. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103119. Epub 2016 May 18.
10
Bioethical Issues in Providing Financial Incentives to Research Participants.向研究参与者提供经济激励措施中的生物伦理问题。
Medicoleg Bioeth. 2015 Jun 24;5:35-41. doi: 10.2147/MB.S70416.