• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套息肉切除术技术的随机对照试验:技术比圈套丝直径更重要。

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cold Snare Polypectomy Technique: Technique Matters More Than Snare Wire Diameter.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):100. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554
PMID:34817440
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is safe and effective for the removal of small adenomas (≤10 mm); however, reported incomplete resection rates (IRRs) vary. The optimal CSP technique, where a wide margin of normal tissue is resected around the target lesion, and snare design have both been hypothesized to reduce the IRR after CSP. We sought to investigate the efficacy of a thin-wire versus thick-wire diameter snare on IRR, using the standardized CSP technique.

METHODS

This was an international multicenter parallel design randomized trial with 17 endoscopists of varying experience (NCT02581254). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the use of a thin-wire (0.30 mm) or thick-wire (0.47 mm) snare for CSP of small (≤10 mm) colorectal polyps. The primary end point was the IRR as determined by the histologic assessment of the defect margin after polypectomy.

RESULTS

Over 52 months to January 2020, 1,393 patients were eligible. A total of 660 patients with polyps (57.4% male) were randomized to a thin-wire (n = 339) or thick-wire (n = 321) snare. The overall IRR of the cohort was 1.5%. There was no significant difference in the IRR between the thin- and thick-wire arms; relative risk-0.41, 95% CI (0.11-1.56), P = 0.21. No significant differences were observed in the rate of adverse events.

DISCUSSION

In this multicenter randomized trial, CSP is safe and effective with very low rates of incomplete resection independent of the diameter of the snare wire used. This suggests that the optimal operator technique is more important than the snare design alone in minimizing residual adenoma after CSP.

摘要

简介

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)对于切除小腺瘤(≤10mm)是安全且有效的;然而,报道的不完全切除率(IRR)有所不同。假设通过优化 CSP 技术,在目标病变周围切除正常组织的宽边缘,并设计圈套,都可以降低 CSP 后的 IRR。我们旨在研究使用标准化 CSP 技术时,细径(0.30mm)和粗径(0.47mm)圈套在 IRR 上的效果。

方法

这是一项国际性、多中心、平行设计的随机试验,有 17 位经验不同的内镜医生参与(NCT02581254)。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分为细径(0.30mm)或粗径(0.47mm)圈套组,进行小(≤10mm)结直肠息肉的 CSP。主要终点是通过息肉切除后的组织学评估确定的 IRR。

结果

截至 2020 年 1 月的 52 个月期间,共有 1393 名患者符合条件。共有 660 名(57.4%为男性)患有息肉的患者被随机分为细径(n=339)或粗径(n=321)圈套组。该队列的总体 IRR 为 1.5%。细径和粗径圈套组之间的 IRR 无显著差异;相对风险 0.41,95%CI(0.11-1.56),P=0.21。未观察到不良事件发生率的显著差异。

讨论

在这项多中心随机试验中,CSP 是安全有效的,且不完全切除率非常低,与使用的圈套线直径无关。这表明,在 CSP 后尽量减少残留腺瘤方面,最佳的操作者技术比圈套设计本身更为重要。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cold Snare Polypectomy Technique: Technique Matters More Than Snare Wire Diameter.冷圈套息肉切除术技术的随机对照试验:技术比圈套丝直径更重要。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):100. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554.
2
Comparison of complete resection rates in cold snare polypectomy using two different wire diameter snares: A randomized controlled study.两种不同线径冷圈套息肉切除术切除率的比较:一项随机对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 May;38(5):752-760. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16092. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与热圈套切除术治疗结直肠小息肉内镜下切除的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 19;38(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2.
4
A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.一项比较巨检活检钳与冷圈套切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1206-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps.结肠镜下完全切除小的结直肠息肉的息肉切除术。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
7
Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套器与热圈套器息肉切除术治疗4-9毫米息肉的随机对照试验:完整息肉切除
Endoscopy. 2022 Oct;54(10):961-969. doi: 10.1055/a-1734-7952. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷活检钳息肉切除术联合双活检技术用于切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
9
Incomplete resection of colorectal polyps of 4-20 mm in size when using a cold snare, and its associated factors.使用冷圈套切除 4-20mm 大小的结直肠息肉时的不完全切除及其相关因素。
Endoscopy. 2023 Oct;55(10):929-937. doi: 10.1055/a-1978-3277. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
10
Rates of Incomplete Resection of 1- to 20-mm Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.1-20mm 结直肠息肉不完全切除率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):904-914.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套内镜黏膜切除术与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术治疗小大肠息肉的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71067-1.
2
Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm.下消化道肿瘤的内镜切除:临床算法
Visc Med. 2024 Aug;40(4):217-227. doi: 10.1159/000539219. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Effectiveness and safety of thin vs. thick cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.小的结直肠息肉采用冷圈套息肉切除术时,细圈套与粗圈套的有效性和安全性:系统评价与Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jan 19;12(1):E99-E107. doi: 10.1055/a-2221-7792. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection.使用常规黏膜下注射的宽视野冷圈套切除术时,4至20毫米无蒂结直肠息肉的不完全切除率
Endosc Int Open. 2023 May 17;11(5):E480-E489. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-2392. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: Is cold snaring the promised land?非壶腹十二指肠腺瘤的内镜切除:冷圈套器是理想方法吗?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Apr 16;15(4):248-258. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i4.248.
7
Virtual scale endoscope-assisted wide-field resection of large sessile serrated lesions.虚拟缩放内镜辅助下广基大锯齿状病变的宽视野切除术。
Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(S 01):E314-E315. doi: 10.1055/a-1981-2392. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套息肉切除术使用细圈套器与粗圈套器的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2022 Nov;55(6):742-750. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.141. Epub 2022 Nov 9.