University Clinic Golnik, Golnik 36, 4204, Golnik, Slovenia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Feb;134(3-4):130-138. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01972-2. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
During transitions of care, patient's medications are prone to medication errors. This study evaluated the impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at hospital admission on unintentional medication discrepancies and adverse drug events.
A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 120 adult medical patients hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Slovenia. In the intervention group, a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation was performed on admission, while the control group received usual care. Patient's drug treatment before admission was compared with their admission and inpatient treatment to identify discrepancies. The intention of discrepancies and related adverse drug events were assessed as a consensus of an expert panel.
Included patients were elderly (median 72 years) and treated with polypharmacy (median 7 medications). Upon admission, discrepancies and unintentional discrepancies, representing a medication error, were identified in 61.2% (825/1347) and 18.3% (247/1347) of medications, respectively. In the intervention group, only 29.1% (37/127) of unintentional discrepancies were reported to the physicians in person. The majority of admission discrepancies (88%) persisted through hospitalization. Unintentional discrepancies resulted in 51 adverse drug events even during hospitalization. There were no differences between the intervention and control group in the occurrence of unintentional discrepancies (p = 0.481) or adverse drug events (p = 0.801).
Medication reconciliation at hospital admission failed to reduce unintentional discrepancies and adverse drug events, possibly due to its poor integration into clinical practice. Discrepancies resulted in patient harm even during the short period of hospitalization, which warrants the implementation of medication reconciliation at hospital admission.
在医疗护理交接过程中,患者的用药容易出现用药错误。本研究评估了在入院时由药剂师主导的用药核对对非故意用药差异和药物不良事件的影响。
在斯洛文尼亚一家三级医院对 120 名成年住院内科患者进行了一项随机对照临床试验。在干预组中,在入院时由药剂师主导进行用药核对,而对照组则接受常规护理。将患者入院前的药物治疗与入院时和住院期间的治疗进行比较,以确定差异。差异的意图和相关的药物不良事件被评估为一个专家小组的共识。
纳入的患者年龄较大(中位数 72 岁),并用多种药物治疗(中位数 7 种药物)。入院时,分别有 61.2%(825/1347)和 18.3%(247/1347)的药物出现差异和非故意差异,代表用药错误。在干预组中,只有 29.1%(37/127)的非故意差异被当面报告给医生。大多数入院差异(88%)在住院期间仍然存在。即使在住院期间,非故意差异也导致了 51 起药物不良事件。干预组和对照组在非故意差异(p=0.481)或药物不良事件(p=0.801)的发生方面没有差异。
入院时的用药核对未能减少非故意差异和药物不良事件,可能是因为其与临床实践的结合较差。即使在住院期间很短的时间内,差异也会导致患者受到伤害,这需要在入院时实施用药核对。