Suppr超能文献

一家由医生配备的直升机紧急医疗服务机构对院前 eFAST 的准确性进行的多中心评估。

A multicenter evaluation of the accuracy of prehospital eFAST by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service.

机构信息

Aeromedical Operations, NSW Ambulance, 33 Nancy Ellis Leebold Drive, Bankstown Airport, Sydney, NSW, 2200, Australia.

Emergency Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-02002-4. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report the relative accuracy of prehospital extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) examinations performed by HEMS physicians.

METHODS

Trauma patients who received prehospital eFAST by HEMS clinicians between January 2013 and December 2017 were reviewed. The clinician's interpretations of these ultrasounds were compared to gold standard references of CT imaging or operating room findings. The outcomes measured include the calculated accuracy of eFAST for detecting intraperitoneal free fluid (IPFF), pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial fluid compared to available gold standard results.

RESULTS

Of the 411 patients with adequate data for comparison, the median age was 39.5 years with 73% male and 98% sustaining blunt force trauma. For the detection of IPFF, eFAST had a sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 16-36%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 93-98%). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for pneumothorax (38% and 96% respectively), hemothorax (17% and 97% respectively), and pericardial effusion (17% and 100% respectively). These results did not change significantly when reassessed with several sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital eFAST is reliable for detecting the presence of intraperitoneal free fluid. This finding should inform receiving trauma teams to prepare for early definitive care in these patients. The low sensitivities across all components of the eFAST highlight the importance of cautiously interpreting negative studies while prompting the need for further studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618001973202 (Registered on 06/12/2018).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告由 HEMS 医师进行的院前扩展焦点评估超声检查(eFAST)的相对准确性。

方法

回顾了 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受 HEMS 临床医生院前 eFAST 的创伤患者。将临床医生对这些超声的解释与 CT 成像或手术室结果的金标准参考进行比较。测量的结果包括与可用金标准结果相比,eFAST 检测腹腔游离液(IPFF)、气胸、血胸和心包积液的准确性。

结果

在 411 名有足够数据进行比较的患者中,中位年龄为 39.5 岁,73%为男性,98%为钝性创伤。对于 IPFF 的检测,eFAST 的敏感性为 25%(95%CI 16-36%),特异性为 96%(95%CI 93-98%)。计算了气胸(分别为 38%和 96%)、血胸(分别为 17%和 97%)和心包积液(分别为 17%和 100%)的敏感性和特异性。当使用几种敏感性分析重新评估时,这些结果没有明显变化。

结论

院前 eFAST 可靠地用于检测腹腔游离液的存在。这一发现应告知接受创伤团队为这些患者的早期确定性治疗做好准备。eFAST 的所有组件的敏感性均较低,这突出了谨慎解释阴性研究的重要性,同时也提示需要进一步研究。

试验注册

ACTRN12618001973202(于 2018 年 6 月 12 日注册)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验