UK Public Health Rapid Support Team, Public Health England/London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
UK Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP), Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 24;16(11):e0260041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260041. eCollection 2021.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments have implemented a range of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) to reduce transmission and minimise morbidity and mortality, whilst maintaining social and economic activities. The perceptions of public health workers (PHWs) and healthcare workers (HCWs) are essential to inform future COVID-19 strategies as they are viewed as trusted sources and are at the forefront of COVID-19 response. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the practicality of implementing NPIs and PIs and 2) identify potential barriers to implementation, as perceived by HCWs and PHWs.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of PHWs and HCWs perceptions of the implementation, practicality of, and barriers to implementation of NPIs and PIs using an online survey (28/9/2020-1/11/2020) available in English, French and Portuguese. We used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to analyse quantitative and qualitative responses.
In total, 226 respondents (67 HCWs and 159 PHWs) from 52 countries completed the survey and 222 were included in the final analysis. Participants from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) accounted for 63% of HCWs and 67% of PHWs, with the remaining from high-income (HICs). There was little difference between the perceptions of PHWs and HCWs in HICs and LMICs, with the majority regarding a number of common NPIs as difficult to implement. However, PHWs in HICs perceived restrictions on schools and educational institutions to be more difficult to implement, with a lack of childcare support identified as the main barrier. Additionally, most contact tracing methods were perceived to be more difficult to implement in HICs than LMICs, with a range of barriers reported. A lack of public support was the most commonly reported barrier to NPIs overall across both country income and professional groups. Similarly, public fear of vaccine safety and lack of vaccine supply were the main reported barriers to implementing a COVID-19 vaccine. However, PHWs and HCWs in LMICs perceived a lack of financial support and the vaccine being manufactured in another country as additional barriers.
This snapshot provides insight into the difficulty of implementing interventions as perceived by PHWs and HCWs. There is no one-size-fits-all solution to implementing interventions, and barriers in different contexts do vary. Barriers to implementing a vaccine programme expressed here by HCWs and PHCWs have subsequently come to the fore internationally.
为应对 COVID-19 大流行,各国政府实施了一系列非药物干预(NPIs)和药物干预(PIs)措施,以降低传播率,最大限度地减少发病率和死亡率,同时维持社会和经济活动。公共卫生工作者(PHWs)和卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的看法对于制定未来的 COVID-19 策略至关重要,因为他们被视为可信赖的信息来源,并且是 COVID-19 应对工作的第一线。本研究的目的是:1)描述实施 NPIs 和 PIs 的实际情况;2)确定 HCWs 和 PHWs 认为实施 NPIs 和 PIs 的潜在障碍。
我们使用在线调查(2020 年 9 月 28 日至 11 月 1 日,提供英语、法语和葡萄牙语版本)对 PHWs 和 HCWs 对 NPIs 和 PIs 的实施、实用性以及实施障碍的看法进行了横断面研究。我们使用描述性统计和主题分析来分析定量和定性反应。
共有来自 52 个国家的 226 名受访者(67 名 HCWs 和 159 名 PHWs)完成了调查,其中 222 名被纳入最终分析。来自中低收入国家(LMICs)的参与者占 HCWs 的 63%和 PHWs 的 67%,其余来自高收入国家(HICs)。HICs 和 LMICs 的 PHWs 和 HCWs 的看法几乎没有差异,大多数人认为一些常见的 NPIs 难以实施。然而,HICs 的 PHWs 认为限制学校和教育机构更难实施,缺乏儿童保育支持被认为是主要障碍。此外,大多数接触者追踪方法在 HICs 被认为比 LMICs 更难实施,报告了各种障碍。在 HICs 和 LMICs 中,缺乏公众支持是实施 NPIs 的最常见障碍。同样,公众对疫苗安全性的担忧和疫苗供应不足是实施 COVID-19 疫苗的主要障碍。然而,LMICs 的 PHWs 和 HCWs 认为缺乏财政支持和疫苗在另一个国家制造是额外的障碍。
本研究快照提供了 PHWs 和 HCWs 对干预措施实施难度的看法。实施干预措施没有一刀切的解决方案,不同背景下的障碍确实存在差异。这里 HCWs 和 PHWs 表达的疫苗接种计划实施障碍在国际上随后突显出来。