Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center (formerly Assaf Harofeh Medical Center), Zerifin, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8810-8816. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2005563. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) disorders have become a major iatrogenic obstetric complication worldwide. Data on the accuracy of ultrasound examination diagnosis are limited by incomplete confirmation and variability in the description of the different grades of PAS at delivery. The aim of this study was to compare our prenatal routine sonographic screening and diagnostic scoring system with a standardized clinical grading system at birth in patient at risk of PAS.
This is a retrospective cohort study of 607 pregnant patients with at least one prior cesarean delivery between December 2013 and December 2018. All patients were assessed for PAS using our institutional prenatal sonographic scoring system and the corresponding ultrasound findings were compared with those of a standardized clinical intra-operative macroscopic grading system of the degree of accreta placentation at vaginal birth or laparotomy.
PAS was diagnosed clinically at birth in 50 (8.2%) cases, 17 of which were confirmed by histopathology. A low (score ≤ 5), medium (score 6-7), high (score ≥ 8) probability for PAS was reported in 502, 61 and 44 cases, respectively. The probability score increased significantly ( < .001) in women ≥2 prior cesarean deliveries, with an anterior low-lying/placenta previa, with absent clear space, increased in retroplacental vascularity and with the size and numbers of lacunae. The number of cases classified clinically as grade 1 (non-PAS) and 3 (adherent PAS) was significantly ( < .001) lower in women with a high probability score whereas the rates of the other grades was significantly ( < .001) higher. The widest discrepancy between ultrasound probability score and clinical grade was found for grade 2 which, describes a partial placental adherence and grades 4 and 5 which, refer to placental percreta which describes tissue having invade trough the uterine serosa and beyond.
Both ends of the spectrum of accreta placentation remain difficult to diagnose antenatal and clinically at birth, in particular when no histopathologic confirmation is available. There is a need to develop ultrasound accuracy score systems that can differentiate between the different grades of PAS and which are validated by standardized clinical and pathology protocols.
胎盘植入谱系(PAS)疾病已成为全球主要的医源性产科并发症。由于 PAS 不同分级在分娩时的不完全确认和描述的可变性,超声检查诊断的准确性数据受到限制。本研究旨在比较我们产前常规超声筛查和诊断评分系统与高危 PAS 患者出生时的标准化临床分级系统。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2013 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月间至少有一次剖宫产史的 607 例孕妇。所有患者均采用我们机构的产前超声评分系统评估 PAS,并将相应的超声结果与阴道分娩或剖腹产后胎盘植入程度的标准化临床术中宏观分级系统进行比较。
50 例(8.2%)患者在分娩时临床诊断为 PAS,其中 17 例经组织病理学证实。502 例、61 例和 44 例患者分别报告 PAS 低(评分≤5)、中(评分 6-7)和高(评分≥8)概率。在前次剖宫产、前置胎盘/胎盘低置、无明显间隙、胎盘后血管增加、胎盘腔隙大小和数量增加的妇女中,概率评分显著增加(<0.001)。在高概率评分的妇女中,临床分级为 1 级(非 PAS)和 3 级(粘连 PAS)的病例数显著减少(<0.001),而其他分级的发生率显著增加(<0.001)。超声概率评分与临床分级之间差异最大的是 2 级,它描述了部分胎盘粘连,而 4 级和 5 级则描述了胎盘植入穿透子宫浆膜层并延伸至其他部位的组织。
胎盘植入谱系的两端在产前和分娩时都难以诊断,特别是在没有组织病理学证实的情况下。需要开发能够区分 PAS 不同分级的超声准确性评分系统,并通过标准化的临床和病理协议进行验证。