• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普雷蒂 I 型人工颈椎间盘假体:一项 5 年随访的回顾性对比研究。

Pretic-I was a safe and effective artificial cervical disc prosthesis--a retrospective and comparative study with 5-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 24;22(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04813-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04813-5
PMID:34819053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The newly designed cervical disc prosthesis, Pretic-I, had been finished its limited clinical use for over 5 years. At a short-term follow-up of 2 years, we obtained satisfactory clinical results. The long-term clinical efficacy and safety of Pretic-I will now be analyzed.

METHODS

Peri-operative parameters included intra-operative blood loss, operation time, off-bed time. Clinical parameters included visual analogue scale (VAS) for arm and neck, neck disability index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Radiological parameters included C2-7 Cobb angle, Shell angle, and the range of motion (ROM) of C2-7, functional segment unit (FSU), and adjacent FSU. The CDA-related complications included adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg), adjacent segment disease (ASDis), heterotopic ossification (HO), prosthesis subsidence, prosthesis displacement, and dysphagia.

RESULTS

A total 64 patients from two independent centers received a single-level CDA with Discover (n = 32) and Pretic-I (n = 32), and all of patients finished a 5-year follow-up. There're no significant differences between two groups in peri-operative parameters. The clinical parameters improved greatly in Pretic-I group (p<0.0001), and there's no statistical difference from Discover group. Furthermore, Pretic-I could slightly improve the cervical curvature (15.08 ± 11.75 to 18.00 ± 10.61, p = 0.3079) and perfectly maintain the Shell angle (3.03 ± 3.68 to 2.23 ± 4.10, p = 0.1988), cervical ROM (52.48 ± 14.31 to 53.30 ± 11.71, p = 0.8062) and FSU ROM (12.20 ± 4.52 to 10.73 ± 4.45, p = 0.2002). The incidence of high-grade HO (Grade III-IV) at the final follow-up was significantly lower in Pretic-I group than in Discover group (12.50% vs. 34.38%, p = 0.0389, Statistical Power = 95.36%). The incidences of other CDA-related complications in Pretic-I group were also well-accepted, comparable to the Discover group, without significant differences.

CONCLUSION

CDA with Pretic-I demonstrated a well-accepted and sustained clinical outcome, with a significantly lower incidence of high-grade HO. This newly designed prosthesis is expected to become an alternative choice for cervical disc prosthesis in the future.

摘要

背景

新设计的颈椎间盘假体 Pretic-I 已经完成了超过 5 年的有限临床应用。在为期 2 年的短期随访中,我们获得了满意的临床结果。现在将分析 Pretic-I 的长期临床疗效和安全性。

方法

围手术期参数包括术中出血量、手术时间、离床时间。临床参数包括手臂和颈部的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和日本矫形协会(JOA)评分。影像学参数包括 C2-7 Cobb 角、Shell 角以及 C2-7 的活动范围(ROM)、功能节段单位(FSU)和相邻 FSU。CDA 相关并发症包括相邻节段退变(ASDeg)、相邻节段疾病(ASDis)、异位骨化(HO)、假体下沉、假体移位和吞咽困难。

结果

来自两个独立中心的 64 名患者接受了单节段 CDA,其中 Discover(n=32)和 Pretic-I(n=32),所有患者均完成了 5 年随访。两组在围手术期参数方面无显著差异。Pretic-I 组的临床参数有很大改善(p<0.0001),与 Discover 组无统计学差异。此外,Pretic-I 可略微改善颈椎曲度(15.08±11.75 至 18.00±10.61,p=0.3079),并完美维持 Shell 角(3.03±3.68 至 2.23±4.10,p=0.1988)、颈椎 ROM(52.48±14.31 至 53.30±11.71,p=0.8062)和 FSU ROM(12.20±4.52 至 10.73±4.45,p=0.2002)。末次随访时,Pretic-I 组高级别 HO(III-IV 级)的发生率明显低于 Discover 组(12.50%比 34.38%,p=0.0389,统计效力=95.36%)。Pretic-I 组其他 CDA 相关并发症的发生率也得到了很好的接受,与 Discover 组相比无显著差异。

结论

CDA 联合 Pretic-I 具有良好的可接受性和持续的临床效果,高级别 HO 的发生率显著降低。这种新设计的假体有望成为未来颈椎间盘假体的替代选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cb/8611939/57f70320594f/12891_2021_4813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cb/8611939/4d8b4689cef9/12891_2021_4813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cb/8611939/57f70320594f/12891_2021_4813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cb/8611939/4d8b4689cef9/12891_2021_4813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65cb/8611939/57f70320594f/12891_2021_4813_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pretic-I was a safe and effective artificial cervical disc prosthesis--a retrospective and comparative study with 5-year follow-up.普雷蒂 I 型人工颈椎间盘假体:一项 5 年随访的回顾性对比研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 24;22(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04813-5.
2
[A long-term follow-up study on the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after artificial cervical disc replacement with Discover disc].[关于使用Discover椎间盘进行人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化发生情况的长期随访研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 8;100(45):3584-3589. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200715-02127.
3
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis.新型假体颈椎间盘置换的临床及影像学结果
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):878-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.439. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.Prestige-LP椎间盘颈椎间盘置换术的临床及影像学结果:一项至少6年的随访研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 7;19(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2201-9.
5
[Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].[全颈椎间盘置换术后使用Prodisc-C假体超过10年随访的疗效评估]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15;33(4):393-402. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810109.
6
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
7
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术治疗非连续型颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病:中期至长期随访结果。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2901-2910. doi: 10.1111/os.13900. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
[Analysis of infuence factors of anterior bone loss after cervical disc arthroplasty and its effect on effectiveness].[颈椎间盘置换术后前路骨质丢失的影响因素分析及其对疗效的影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 15;35(1):26-32. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202008126.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: a 10-year follow-up study.颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段颈椎病的临床疗效比较:10 年随访研究。
Spine J. 2023 Mar;23(3):361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
10
Effects of smoking on cervical disc arthroplasty.吸烟对颈椎间盘置换术的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):168-174. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18634. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Cervical Alignment, and Clinical Outcomes After One- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变、颈椎排列及临床疗效的比较
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):589-600. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938166.083. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes.多节段与单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:比较矢状位曲度、早期邻近节段退变和临床结果。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2745-2753. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5677-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
[Early effectiveness of cervical disc replacement by using Pretic-I].
[使用Pretic-I进行颈椎间盘置换的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 15;31(5):513-518. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201612146.
4
Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.单节段颈椎间盘退变疾病行单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与单节段人工颈椎间盘置换术的疗效比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 1;42(1):E41-E49. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001696.
5
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
6
Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段颈椎间盘疾病的成本:对蓝色健康情报数据库中急性和长期成本及并发症的分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):521-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000822.
7
Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的足迹不匹配。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2594-3. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement.Bryan 颈椎间盘置换的并发症。
Orthop Surg. 2010 May;2(2):86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00069.x.
9
[Clinical observation of mid-stage complications after cervical disc replacement].[颈椎间盘置换术后中期并发症的临床观察]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 Jul;23(7):514-7.
10
Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术后 4 年随访中异位骨化的临床结果和进展。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb;19(2):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1259-3. Epub 2009 Dec 25.