• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者接受经皮、手术和药物治疗后的生活质量:一项队列研究。

Quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease submitted to percutaneous, surgical, and medical therapies: a cohort study.

机构信息

Postgraduate Studies Program in Cardiology, School of Medicine, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InCor-HCFMUSP), SP, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 24;19(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01886-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-021-01886-7
PMID:34819096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611891/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical, surgical, and percutaneous strategies similarly prevent major cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The possibility that these strategies have differential effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been debated, particularly in patients treated outside clinical trials.

METHODS

We assigned 454 patients diagnosed with CAD during an elective diagnostic coronary angiography to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimal medical treatment (OMT), and followed them for an average of 5.2 ± 1.5 years. HRQoL was assessed using a validated Brazilian version of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire. The association between therapeutic strategies and quality of life scores was tested using variance analysis and adjusted for confounders in a general linear model.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the mental component summary scores in the follow-up evaluation by therapeutic strategies: 51.4, 53.7, and 52.3 for OMT, PCI, and CABG, respectively. Physical component summary scores were higher in the PCI group than the CABG and OMT groups (46.4 vs. 42.9 and 43.8, respectively); however, these differences were no longer different after adjustment for confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

In a long-term follow-up of patients with stable CAD, HRQoL did not differ in patients treated by medical, percutaneous, or surgical treatments.

摘要

背景

在稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,临床、外科和经皮策略同样可以预防主要心血管事件。这些策略对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)可能具有不同影响的可能性一直存在争议,尤其是在临床试验之外接受治疗的患者中。

方法

我们将 454 名在选择性诊断性冠状动脉造影中诊断为 CAD 的患者分配至冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或最佳药物治疗(OMT)组,并对他们进行了平均 5.2±1.5 年的随访。采用经过验证的巴西版 12 项简明健康调查问卷评估 HRQoL。采用方差分析和一般线性模型中的混杂因素调整来检验治疗策略与生活质量评分之间的关联。

结果

在治疗策略的随访评估中,心理成分综合评分没有差异:OMT、PCI 和 CABG 组分别为 51.4、53.7 和 52.3。PCI 组的生理成分综合评分高于 CABG 和 OMT 组(分别为 46.4、42.9 和 43.8);然而,在调整混杂变量后,这些差异不再有统计学意义。

结论

在稳定型 CAD 患者的长期随访中,接受药物、经皮或手术治疗的患者的 HRQoL 没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c1b/8611891/4e7a574e9bb2/12955_2021_1886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c1b/8611891/c9d2afda994d/12955_2021_1886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c1b/8611891/4e7a574e9bb2/12955_2021_1886_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c1b/8611891/c9d2afda994d/12955_2021_1886_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c1b/8611891/4e7a574e9bb2/12955_2021_1886_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease submitted to percutaneous, surgical, and medical therapies: a cohort study.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者接受经皮、手术和药物治疗后的生活质量:一项队列研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 24;19(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01886-7.
2
Quality of Life After Surgery or DES in Patients With 3-Vessel or Left Main Disease.三血管病变或左主干病变患者接受手术或 DES 治疗后的生活质量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):2039-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.031.
3
Medical Treatment and Revascularization Options in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Disease.2 型糖尿病合并冠心病患者的治疗和血运重建选择。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):985-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.021.
4
Health status and quality of life in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease treated with optimal medical therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention (post hoc findings from the COURAGE trial).稳定性冠心病合并慢性肾脏病患者接受最佳药物治疗或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的健康状况和生活质量( COURAGE 试验的事后发现)。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 1;112(11):1703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
Impact of treatment strategies on outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus according to presenting angina severity: A pooled analysis of three federally-funded randomized trials.根据首发心绞痛严重程度评估稳定型冠状动脉疾病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗策略对结局的影响:三项联邦资助的随机试验的汇总分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Oct;277:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients after previous coronary artery bypass surgery.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(4):322-30. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0199. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).自报健康状况与不良事件之间的关联:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3017-3029. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02573-8. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Economic Analysis of Surgical and Interventional Treatments for Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from a One-Year Single-Center Study.复杂冠状动脉疾病患者的手术和介入治疗的经济学分析:来自一年单中心研究的见解。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Feb 25;26:e919374. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919374.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life, and costs in different treatment modalities of stable coronary artery disease.稳定性冠心病不同治疗方式的长期临床结局、健康相关生活质量和成本。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):74-82. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Clinical, Surgical and Percutaneous Treatment to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Patients Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography: An Observational Study.临床、手术及经皮治疗对接受择期冠状动脉造影患者预防心血管事件的有效性:一项观察性研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Jul 16;16:285-297. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S246963. eCollection 2020.
2
Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease.晚期肾病患者的冠状动脉疾病管理。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23;382(17):1608-1618. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915925. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.
稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Health-Status Outcomes with Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary Disease.冠心病患者采用侵入性或保守治疗的健康状况结局。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1408-1419. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916370. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
Coronary artery bypass confers intermediate-term survival benefit over percutaneous coronary intervention with new-generation stents in real-world patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, including left main disease: a retrospective analysis of 6383 patients.在真实世界中患有多支冠状动脉疾病(包括左主干疾病)的患者中,冠状动脉旁路移植术相较于新一代支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可带来中期生存获益:一项回顾性分析纳入了 6383 例患者。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;56(5):911-918. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz142.
6
Predicting coronary artery disease: a comparison between two data mining algorithms.预测冠状动脉疾病:两种数据挖掘算法的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6721-5.
7
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Quality of Life After Surgery or DES in Patients With 3-Vessel or Left Main Disease.三血管病变或左主干病变患者接受手术或 DES 治疗后的生活质量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):2039-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.031.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life after Coronary Revascularization: A systematic review with meta-analysis.冠状动脉血运重建术后的健康相关生活质量:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 23. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2016.05.003.
10
Reperfusion strategies in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征的再灌注策略。
Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1918-28. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302744.