• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞技运动员中以氧耗量校正的最大运动血压的性别差异。

Sex-Based Differences in Peak Exercise Blood Pressure Indexed to Oxygen Consumption Among Competitive Athletes.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Cardiovascular Performance Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Cardiovascular Performance Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):11-22.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.013
PMID:34819243
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although exercise testing guidelines define cutoffs for an exaggerated exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) response, SBPs above these cutoffs are not uncommon in athletes given their high exercise capacity. Alternately, guidelines also specify a normal SBP response that accounts for metabolic equivalents (METs; mean [SD] of 10 [2] mm Hg per MET or 3.5 mL/kg/min oxygen consumption [V˙o]). SBP and V˙o increase less during exercise in females than males. It is not clear if sex-based differences in exercise SBP are related to differences in V˙o or if current recommendations for normal increase in SBP per MET produce reasonable estimates using measured METs (ie, V˙o) in athletes. We therefore examined sex-based differences in exercise SBP indexed to V˙o in athletes with the goal of defining normative values for exercise SBP that account for fitness and sex.

METHODS

Using prospectively collected data from a single sports cardiology program, normotensive athlete patients were identified who had no relevant cardiopulmonary disease and had undergone cardiopulmonary exercise testing with cycle ergometry or treadmill. The relationship between ΔSBP (peak - rest) and ΔV˙o (peak - rest) was examined in the total cohort and compared between sexes.

FINDINGS

A total of 413 athletes (mean [SD] age, 35.5 [14] years; 38% female; mean [SD] peak V˙o, 46.0 [10.2] mL/kg/min, 127% [27%] predicted) met the inclusion criteria. The ΔSBP correlated with unadjusted ΔV˙o (cycle: R = 0.18, treadmill: R = 0.12; P < 0.0001). Female athletes had lower mean (SD) peak SBP (cycle: 161 [15] vs 186 [24] mm Hg; treadmill: 165 [17] vs 180 [20] mm Hg; P < 0.05) than male athletes. Despite lower peak SBP, mean (SD) ΔSBP relative to unadjusted ΔV˙o was higher in female than male athletes (cycle: 25.6 [7.2] vs 21.1 [7.3] mm Hg/L/min; treadmill: 21.6 [7.2] vs 17.0 [6.2] mm Hg/L/min; P < 0.05). When V˙o was adjusted for body size and converted to METs, female and male athletes had similar mean (SD) ΔSBP /ΔMET (cycle: 6.0 [2.1] vs 5.8 [2.0] mm Hg/mL/kg/min; treadmill: 4.7 [1.8] vs 4.8 [1.7] mm Hg/mL/kg/min).

IMPLICATIONS

In this cohort of athletes without known cardiopulmonary disease, observed sex-based differences in peak exercise SBP were in part related to the differences in ΔV˙o between male and female athletes. Despite lower peak SBP, ΔSBP/unadjusted ΔV˙o was paradoxically higher in female athletes. Future work should define whether this finding reflects sex-based differences in the peripheral vascular response to exercise. In this athletic cohort, ΔSBP/ΔMET was similar between sexes and much lower than the ratio that has been proposed by guidelines to define a normal SBP response. Our observed ΔSBP/ΔMET, based on measured rather than estimated METs, provides a clinically useful estimate for normal peak SBP range in athletes.

摘要

目的

尽管运动测试指南定义了收缩压(SBP)反应过度的截断值,但考虑到运动员的高运动能力,这些截断值以上的 SBP 并不少见。另外,指南还规定了正常的 SBP 反应,该反应考虑了代谢当量(MET;每 MET 的平均[SD]为 10[2]mmHg 或 3.5mL/kg/min 耗氧量[V˙o])。女性在运动过程中 SBP 和 V˙o 的增加低于男性。目前尚不清楚女性运动 SBP 的性别差异是否与 V˙o 的差异有关,或者目前使用测量的 MET(即 V˙o)来估算正常增加的 SBP 每 MET 是否会产生合理的估计值。因此,我们研究了运动员运动 SBP 与 V˙o 的性别差异,目的是确定考虑到健康和性别的运动 SBP 的正常值。

方法

使用来自单一运动心脏病学计划的前瞻性收集数据,确定无相关心肺疾病且已接受功率自行车或跑步机心肺运动测试的正常血压运动员患者。在总队列中检查了 ΔSBP(峰值-休息)与 ΔV˙o(峰值-休息)之间的关系,并比较了性别之间的关系。

发现

共有 413 名运动员(平均[SD]年龄 35.5[14]岁;38%为女性;平均[SD]峰值 V˙o 46.0[10.2]mL/kg/min,预测值的 127%[27%])符合纳入标准。ΔSBP 与未调整的 ΔV˙o 相关(功率自行车:R=0.18,跑步机:R=0.12;P<0.0001)。女性运动员的平均(SD)峰值 SBP(功率自行车:161[15] vs 186[24]mmHg;跑步机:165[17] vs 180[20]mmHg;P<0.05)低于男性运动员。尽管峰值 SBP 较低,但与未调整的 ΔV˙o 相比,女性运动员的平均(SD)ΔSBP 相对较高(功率自行车:25.6[7.2] vs 21.1[7.3]mmHg/L/min;跑步机:21.6[7.2] vs 17.0[6.2]mmHg/L/min;P<0.05)。当 V˙o 根据身体大小进行调整并转换为 MET 时,女性和男性运动员的平均(SD)ΔSBP/ΔMET(功率自行车:6.0[2.1] vs 5.8[2.0]mmHg/mL/kg/min;跑步机:4.7[1.8] vs 4.8[1.7]mmHg/mL/kg/min)相似。

结论

在本队列中,患有已知心肺疾病的运动员中,观察到的男性和女性运动员之间的峰值运动 SBP 性别差异部分与运动员之间的 ΔV˙o 差异有关。尽管峰值 SBP 较低,但与未调整的 ΔV˙o 相比,女性运动员的 ΔSBP 更高。未来的工作应该确定这一发现是否反映了运动对女性外周血管反应的性别差异。在这个运动队列中,ΔSBP/ΔMET 在性别之间相似,远低于指南建议的定义正常 SBP 反应的比值。我们观察到的基于实测而不是估算的 MET 的 ΔSBP/ΔMET 提供了一个在运动员中正常峰值 SBP 范围的临床有用估计值。

相似文献

1
Sex-Based Differences in Peak Exercise Blood Pressure Indexed to Oxygen Consumption Among Competitive Athletes.竞技运动员中以氧耗量校正的最大运动血压的性别差异。
Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):11-22.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
2
Sex differences in workload-indexed blood pressure response and vascular function among professional athletes and their utility for clinical exercise testing.运动员群体中心血管功能和血压反应的性别差异与工作量指数之间的关系,及其在临床运动测试中的应用。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jul;121(7):1859-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04656-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Blood pressure response to graded bicycle exercise in males and females across the age and fitness spectrum.不同年龄和健康水平的男性和女性在分级自行车运动中的血压反应。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 6;32(1):43-51. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae262.
4
Estimation of the Blood Pressure Response With Exercise Stress Testing.运动负荷试验中血压反应的评估。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 May;28(5):742-751. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.04.279. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
5
Blood Pressure Responses During Exercise: Physiological Correlates and Clinical Implications.运动期间的血压反应:生理相关性和临床意义。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023 Jan;43(1):163-173. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318512. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Exercise systolic blood pressure response during cycle ergometry is associated with future hypertension in normotensive individuals.在进行循环功率自行车测试时,运动时的收缩压反应与血压正常的个体未来发生高血压有关。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Jul 23;31(9):1072-1079. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae012.
7
Blood Pressure Response to Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Children with Normal Cardiac Anatomy and Function.儿童正常心脏解剖结构和功能的跑步机心肺运动试验血压反应。
J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;233:169-174.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.02.043. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Exaggerated Exercise Blood Pressure Response During Treadmill Testing as a Predictor of Future Hypertension in Men: A Longitudinal Study.跑步机测试期间运动血压反应过度作为男性未来患高血压的预测指标:一项纵向研究
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Nov;28(11):1362-7. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv036. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
9
Relationships of the systolic blood pressure response during exercise with insulin resistance, obesity, and endurance fitness in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病男性患者运动期间收缩压反应与胰岛素抵抗、肥胖及耐力适应性的关系。
Metabolism. 2002 Oct;51(10):1247-52. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.35180.
10
Blood pressure response to maximal dynamic exercise testing in an athletic population.运动员群体最大动态运动测试中的血压反应。
J Hypertens. 2018 Sep;36(9):1803-1809. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001791.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise blood pressure in adults with high-risk left ventricular hypertrophy: the importance of normalizing blood pressure to oxygen uptake.高危左心室肥厚成人的运动血压:血压与摄氧量正常化的重要性
J Hypertens. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000004074.
2
Sex-Related Determinants of Exercise Intolerance in HFpEF: Not Just a Matter of the Heart!射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)中运动不耐受的性别相关决定因素:不仅仅是心脏的问题!
JACC Adv. 2024 Jun 10;3(7):101038. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101038. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Exercise in Endurance Athletes in Relation to Oxygen Uptake, Work Rate and Normative Values.
耐力运动员运动时收缩压反应与摄氧量、工作负荷及正常参考值的关系
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Jul 15;9(7):227. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9070227.