• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3.0 特斯拉胎儿大脑 3 期末端的规范性弥散。

3.0 Tesla normative diffusivity in 3rd trimester fetal brain.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, 2 Sheba Rd, Ramat-Gan 52621, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2022 Jun;64(6):1249-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02863-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-021-02863-z
PMID:34820712
Abstract

PURPOSE

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the developing fetus provide valuable information on the diagnosis and prognosis of prenatal brain pathologies. Normative ADC data has been previously established in 1.5 T MR scanners but lacking in 3.0 T scanners. Our objective was to measure ADC values in various brain areas in a cohort of normal singleton fetuses scanned in a 3.0 T MR scanner.

METHODS

DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) was performed in 47 singleton fetuses with normal or questionably abnormal results on sonography followed by normal structural MR imaging. ADC values were measured in cerebral lobes (frontal, parietal, temporal lobes), basal ganglia, and pons. Regression analysis was used to examine gestational age-related changes in regional ADC.

RESULTS

Median gestational age was 30.1 weeks (range, 26-34 weeks). There was a significant effect of region on ADC values, whereby ADC values were highest in cerebral lobes (parietal > frontal > temporal lobes), compared with basal ganglia. The lowest values were found in the pons. On regression analysis, there was a decrease in ADC values in basal ganglia and pons with increasing gestational age. ADC values in frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes were stable in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Regional brain ADC values in 3.0 T scanners are comparable with previously reported values in 1.5 T scanners, with similar changes over gestational age. Using 3.0 T scanners is increasing worldwide. For fetal imaging, establishing normal ADC values is critical as DWI enables a sensitive and quantitative technique to evaluate normal and abnormal brain development.

摘要

目的

胎儿发育过程中的表观扩散系数(ADC)值可提供有关产前脑病变的诊断和预后的有价值信息。1.5T 磁共振扫描仪中已经建立了 ADC 的正常参考值,但 3.0T 扫描仪中缺乏相关数据。我们的目的是在使用 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪对正常的单胎胎儿进行一系列检查后,测量各个脑区的 ADC 值。

方法

对超声检查结果正常或可疑异常的 47 例单胎胎儿进行弥散加权成像(DWI)检查,随后进行常规结构磁共振成像。在大脑叶(额叶、顶叶、颞叶)、基底节和脑桥处测量 ADC 值。采用回归分析来检查各区域 ADC 值与胎龄的相关性变化。

结果

中位胎龄为 30.1 周(范围,26-34 周)。ADC 值受脑区影响,大脑叶的 ADC 值最高(顶叶>额叶>颞叶),而基底节的 ADC 值最低。回归分析显示,随着胎龄的增加,基底节和脑桥的 ADC 值逐渐降低。本研究中,额叶、顶叶和颞叶的 ADC 值在我们的队列中保持稳定。

结论

3.0T 扫描仪的脑区 ADC 值与之前在 1.5T 扫描仪中的报道值相似,且在胎龄方面的变化趋势一致。3.0T 扫描仪在全球范围内的应用日益增多。对于胎儿成像而言,建立 ADC 的正常参考值至关重要,因为 DWI 可作为一种敏感且定量的技术,用于评估正常和异常的脑发育。

相似文献

1
3.0 Tesla normative diffusivity in 3rd trimester fetal brain.3.0 特斯拉胎儿大脑 3 期末端的规范性弥散。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Jun;64(6):1249-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02863-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
Regional apparent diffusion coefficient values in 3rd trimester fetal brain.孕晚期胎儿脑区的表观扩散系数值
Neuroradiology. 2014 Jul;56(7):561-7. doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1359-6. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
3
Normative apparent diffusion coefficient values in the developing fetal brain.胎儿脑发育过程中的规范表观扩散系数值。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Oct;30(9):1799-803. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1661. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
4
[Relationship between gestational age and apparent diffusion coefficient values in different regions of fetal brain from middle to late trimester].孕中期至晚期胎儿脑不同区域的胎龄与表观扩散系数值之间的关系
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Aug 20;93(31):2463-6.
5
Anatomical and diffusion-weighted imaging of brain abnormalities in third-trimester fetuses with cytomegalovirus infection.巨细胞病毒感染胎儿晚期脑异常的解剖学和弥散加权成像。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):68-75. doi: 10.1002/uog.24856.
6
Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of brain in fetal growth restriction: results of prospective multicenter study.胎儿生长受限的脑弥散加权磁共振成像的预后价值:前瞻性多中心研究结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;56(6):893-900. doi: 10.1002/uog.21926.
7
Brain fetal magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate maturation of normal white matter during the third trimester of pregnancy.脑胎儿磁共振成像评估妊娠晚期正常白质的成熟度。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Sep;51(10):1826-1838. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05064-1. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
Region-specific reductions in brain apparent diffusion coefficient in cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses.巨细胞病毒感染胎儿脑区表观弥散系数降低。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):600-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14737.
9
A diffusion-weighted template for gestational age-related apparent diffusion coefficient values in the developing fetal brain.发育中胎儿大脑中与孕龄相关的表观扩散系数值的扩散加权模板。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):318-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.4078.
10
Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: reproducibility of regional apparent diffusion coefficients for the normal fetal brain.磁共振弥散加权成像:正常胎儿脑区域性表观弥散系数的可重复性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):190-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.11219. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing Laterality in Brain Injury in Rabbit Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Novel Volume Rendering Techniques.使用新型容积渲染技术在兔胎儿磁共振成像中区分脑损伤的侧别
Dev Neurosci. 2025;47(1):55-67. doi: 10.1159/000539212. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Sex differences in normal fetal regional brain apparent diffusion coefficient changes assessed by DWI.通过扩散加权成像(DWI)评估正常胎儿脑区表观扩散系数变化中的性别差异。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Mar 19;12:1354475. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1354475. eCollection 2024.
3
Regional changes in brain apparent diffusion coefficient in fetuses with complex congenital heart disease and normal pregnancy assessed using diffusion-weighted imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Various Cerebral and Extracerebral Pathologies on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Fetal Brain.各种脑内和脑外病变对胎儿脑表观弥散系数值的影响。
J Neuroimaging. 2020 Jul;30(4):477-485. doi: 10.1111/jon.12727. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Fetal Echoplanar Imaging: Promises and Challenges.胎儿回波平面成像:前景与挑战。
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;28(5):245-254. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000219.
3
Does 3-T fetal MRI induce adverse acoustic effects in the neonate? A preliminary study comparing postnatal auditory test performance of fetuses scanned at 1.5 and 3 T.
利用扩散加权成像评估患有复杂先天性心脏病的胎儿及正常妊娠胎儿脑表观扩散系数的区域变化。
Front Neurol. 2023 May 30;14:1136633. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1136633. eCollection 2023.
3-T胎儿磁共振成像是否会对新生儿产生不良声学影响?一项比较在1.5 T和3 T下扫描的胎儿出生后听觉测试表现的初步研究。
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Jan;49(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4261-2. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.北美儿科诊断放射科医生调查:胎儿磁共振成像的当前实践
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Dec;48(13):1924-1935. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4236-3. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Cerebral Diffusivity Changes in Fetuses with Chiari II Malformation.脑弥散度变化在 Chiari II 畸形胎儿。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(4):268-274. doi: 10.1159/000490102. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Region-specific changes in brain diffusivity in fetal isolated mild ventriculomegaly.胎儿孤立性轻度脑室扩大时脑扩散率的区域特异性变化。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):840-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3893-y. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Region-specific reductions in brain apparent diffusion coefficient in cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses.巨细胞病毒感染胎儿脑区表观弥散系数降低。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):600-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14737.
8
Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal fetal brain development from gestational age week 24 up to term age: a preliminary study.孕24周直至足月时正常胎儿脑发育表观扩散系数的评估:一项初步研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;37(2):102-7. doi: 10.1159/000363650. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Comparison between diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) at 1.5 and 3 tesla: a phantom study.1.5 特斯拉和 3 特斯拉磁共振扩散加权成像(DW-MRI)的比较:一项体模研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):682-90. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24397. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
10
Interimager variability in ADC measurement of the human brain.人脑ADC测量中的临时成像仪变异性。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13(2):81-7. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0098. Epub 2014 Apr 28.