• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人脑ADC测量中的临时成像仪变异性。

Interimager variability in ADC measurement of the human brain.

作者信息

Tsujita Naoko, Kai Naoki, Fujita Yujiro, Hiai Yasuhiro, Hirai Toshinori, Kitajima Mika, Yamashita Yasuyuki, Murakami Ryuji

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13(2):81-7. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0098. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

DOI:10.2463/mrms.2012-0098
PMID:24769632
Abstract

PURPOSE

Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.

METHODS

In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5- (n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P < 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P < 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.

摘要

目的

常规临床实践涉及多种扫描参数的应用,这些参数可能会影响表观扩散系数(ADC)值。我们评估了不同成像仪之间ADC值的变异性及其在临床应用中的潜在影响。

方法

在7名健康志愿者中,我们使用常规临床参数以及来自5家不同供应商的1.5特斯拉(n = 9)和3特斯拉(n = 3)磁共振(MR)成像仪获取扩散加权(DW)图像,共进行了84次MR成像研究。为了评估成像仪、供应商和磁场强度之间ADC值的差异,我们测量了7名志愿者双侧大脑半球额叶白质和丘脑(灰质)的平均像素值,并使用重复测量方差分析进行多重比较。

结果

12台成像仪测得的双侧结构ADC值的左右差异范围为1%至3%。虽然产生最高和最低平均ADC值的扫描仪之间白质ADC值的相对差异为7%(P < 0.01),但同一供应商的仪器之间差异在2%至4%以内。对于灰质,即使在同一供应商的仪器之间,成像仪间差异也为4%至12%(P < 0.05)。在3T成像仪中,白质和灰质的差异约为3%。

结论

ADC值在成像仪之间存在显著差异,尤其是在灰质方面。然而,考虑到现有的左右差异,尽管使用了不同的扫描参数,我们的3T成像仪之间的差异可能是可以接受的。在常规临床实践中,必须逐台成像仪考虑现有的变异性。

相似文献

1
Interimager variability in ADC measurement of the human brain.人脑ADC测量中的临时成像仪变异性。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13(2):81-7. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0098. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
2
Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study.不同平台间绝对表观扩散系数值的变异性可能很大:一项多厂商、多机构的比较研究。
Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):624-30. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492071681.
3
Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the subacute stage: elevated apparent diffusion coefficient in normal-appearing brain tissue after treatment.亚急性期蛛网膜下腔出血:治疗后,正常脑组织中表观扩散系数升高。
Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):518-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422051698. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
4
Apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility in brain tumors measured on 1.5 and 3 T clinical scanners: A pilot study.在 1.5T 和 3T 临床扫描仪上测量脑肿瘤的表观扩散系数可重复性:一项初步研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov;108:249-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain in a healthy adult population: Normative values and measurement reproducibility at 3 T and 1.5 T.健康成年人群大脑的扩散张量成像:3T和1.5T时的标准值及测量可重复性
Acta Radiol. 2010 Sep;51(7):800-7. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.495351.
6
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of upper abdominal organs: field strength and intervendor variability of apparent diffusion coefficients.腹部器官的弥散加权磁共振成像:表观弥散系数的场强和不同供应商间的可变性。
Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):454-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130819. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
7
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Is Not Dependent on Magnetic Resonance Systems and Field Strength Under Fixed Imaging Parameters in Brain.在脑部固定成像参数下,表观扩散系数值不依赖于磁共振系统和场强。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):760-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000266.
8
High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal brain at 3T.3T 下正常脑的高 b 值扩散加权磁共振成像
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Mar;69(3):454-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.023. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
9
Between-Scanner and Between-Visit Variation in Normal White Matter Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Setting of a Multi-Center Clinical Trial.多中心临床试验背景下正常白质表观扩散系数值的扫描仪间及访视间差异
Clin Neuroradiol. 2016 Dec;26(4):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s00062-015-0381-3. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.扩散加权成像中乳腺表观扩散系数(ADC)测量变异性来源的评估与量化
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.032. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal and sequence-related variability in diffusion-weighted imaging of presumed cerebrovascular accidents in the dog brain.犬脑疑似脑血管意外的扩散加权成像中的时间及序列相关变异性
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 7;9:1008447. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1008447. eCollection 2022.
2
3.0 Tesla normative diffusivity in 3rd trimester fetal brain.3.0 特斯拉胎儿大脑 3 期末端的规范性弥散。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Jun;64(6):1249-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02863-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Differences in the gray-to-white matter ratio according to different computed tomography scanners for outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients receiving target temperature management.
根据不同 CT 扫描仪的灰-白质比值差异预测接受目标温度管理的心脏停搏后患者的结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0258480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258480. eCollection 2021.
4
Uric Acid and Gluconic Acid as Predictors of Hyperglycemia and Cytotoxic Injury after Stroke.尿酸和葡萄糖酸作为中风后高血糖和细胞毒性损伤的预测因子。
Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Apr;12(2):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00862-5. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Signal Intensity Ratio Predicts the Effect of Revascularization on Ischemic Cerebral Edema.表观扩散系数信号强度比可预测血管再通对缺血性脑水肿的影响。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):93-100. doi: 10.1159/000487406. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Hyperglycemia is associated with more severe cytotoxic injury after stroke.高血糖与中风后更严重的细胞毒性损伤相关。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Jul;37(7):2577-2583. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16671730. Epub 2016 Jan 1.