Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Virchows Arch. 2022 Mar;480(3):565-575. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03236-w. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
The histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) based on the findings obtained by an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is feasible, but the diagnostic consistency of this method has not been confirmed. We determined the interobserver agreement among 20 pathologists regarding the diagnosis of type 1 AIP, including the distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using large tissue samples obtained by EUS-FNB. After guidance for diagnosing AIP with biopsy tissues was provided, a round 2 was performed. The median sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PDAC vs. non-neoplastic diseases were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. In groups of specialists (n = 7) and the generalists (n = 13), Fleiss' к-values increased from 0.886 to 0.958 and from 0.750 to 0.816 in round 2. The concordance was fair or moderate for obliterative phlebitis and storiform fibrosis but slight for ductal lesion of type 1 AIP. Discordant results were due to ambiguous findings and biopsy tissue limitations. Among the specialists, the ratio of cases with perfect agreement regarding the presence of storiform fibrosis increased in round 2, but agreement regarding obliterative phlebitis or ductal lesions was not improved. Although the histological definite diagnosis of type 1 AIP was achieved by most observers in > 60% of the cases, the confidence levels varied. Because some ambiguities exist, the histological diagnostic levels based on the diagnostic criteria of type 1 AIP should not be taken for granted. Guidance is effective for improving accurate PDAC diagnoses (notably by recognizing acinar-ductal metaplasia) and for evaluating storiform fibrosis.
基于内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)获得的结果,对 1 型自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)进行组织学诊断是可行的,但该方法的诊断一致性尚未得到证实。我们确定了 20 位病理学家在诊断 1 型 AIP 方面的观察者间一致性,包括使用 EUS-FNB 获得的大组织样本与胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的区分。在提供了用活检组织诊断 AIP 的指导后,进行了第二轮。诊断 PDAC 与非肿瘤性疾病的中位敏感性和特异性分别为 95.2%和 100%。在专家组(n=7)和普通组(n=13)中,Fleiss'к值在第二轮中分别从 0.886 增加到 0.958 和从 0.750 增加到 0.816。闭塞性静脉炎和束状纤维化的一致性为中等或适度,但 1 型 AIP 的导管病变为轻度。不一致的结果是由于存在模糊的发现和活检组织的局限性。在专家中,第二轮中存在束状纤维化的病例具有完美一致性的比例增加,但闭塞性静脉炎或导管病变的一致性没有提高。尽管大多数观察者在超过 60%的病例中通过组织学明确诊断为 1 型 AIP,但置信水平存在差异。由于存在一些模棱两可的情况,基于 1 型 AIP 诊断标准的组织学诊断水平不应被视为理所当然。指导对于提高准确诊断 PDAC(特别是通过识别腺管化生)和评估束状纤维化是有效的。