Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Clin Ter. 2021 Nov 22;172(6):531-541. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2374.
The human auricle has attracted the attention of forensic scientists since a long for its unique morphological characteristics. In modern times, these unique features can be captured by CCTV cameras, which may be extremely useful during the identification process in a criminal investigation. Unique morphological characteristics such as Darwin's tubercle, shape, and size of the ear, different morphological features of the helix, tragus, lobule, etc. are frequently used in the identification and individualization process. The human ear was not only accessi-ble for its morphological and morphometric variations, but also its existing bilateral, sex, and population differences. The present study was conducted on 140 individuals (71 males and 69 females) aged between 18 and 30 years. The data were collected from the colleges of Nahan city of Sirmaur district in Himachal Pradesh state of North India. Various anthropometric measurements were taken independently on the left and right ear of each individual with the help of a pair of sliding calipers using a standard method. These linear measurements were physiognomic ear length, physiognomic ear breadth, ear length above tragus, distance from tragus to antihelix, distance from tragus to the helix, lobule height, and lobule width. Auricular index, lobular index, and lobular ear index were calculated from the aforementioned measurements. Further, an independent t-test/ Mann Witney U test and paired sample t-test/ Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were applied for the evaluation of sex differences and bilateral differences in the human ear, respectively. For the prediction of sexual dimorphism, discriminant function analysis was applied. Physiognomic ear length, physiognomic ear breadth, ear length above tragus, distances from tragus to antihelix (left ear only), and tragus to helix exhibited significant sex differences on both sides (p<0.05). Significant bilateral differences (p<0.05) were reported for all the measurements of the ear in males except for lobule height, whereas, significant side differences (p<0.05) were shown for ear length above tragus, distance from tragus to helix, and lobule width among females. The discriminant function model showed 82.10% accuracy for determining sexual dimorphism. The study highlighted sexual dimorphism and bilateral differences in ear morphometry in a north Indian population and provided a database of anthropometric variables in the human ear for forensic and anthropological uses.
人类耳廓因其独特的形态特征而引起法医学家的关注。在现代,这些独特的特征可以被闭路电视摄像机捕捉到,这在犯罪调查的身份识别过程中可能非常有用。在身份识别和个体识别过程中,经常使用达尔文结节、耳廓形状和大小、耳轮不同的形态特征、耳屏、耳垂等独特的形态特征。人类耳廓不仅因其形态和形态测量学的变化,还因其现有的双侧、性别和人群差异而易于识别。本研究对来自印度北部喜马偕尔邦西姆拉区纳汉市的 140 名年龄在 18 至 30 岁之间的个体(男性 71 名,女性 69 名)进行了研究。通过使用一对滑动卡尺,按照标准方法,分别对每个个体的左耳和右耳进行了各种人体测量。这些线性测量值包括耳长、耳宽、耳屏上耳长、耳屏至对耳轮、耳屏至耳轮、耳垂高度和耳垂宽度。从上述测量值计算出耳廓指数、耳垂指数和耳垂耳指数。进一步,分别应用独立样本 t 检验/曼-惠特尼 U 检验和配对样本 t 检验/威尔科克森符号秩检验,评估了人类耳廓的性别差异和双侧差异。为了预测性别二态性,应用了判别函数分析。左右耳的耳长、耳宽、耳屏上耳长、耳屏至对耳轮(仅左耳)和耳屏至耳轮的长度均存在显著的性别差异(p<0.05)。除了耳垂高度外,男性的所有耳部测量值均存在显著的双侧差异(p<0.05),而女性的耳屏上耳长、耳屏至耳轮距离和耳垂宽度则存在显著的侧差异(p<0.05)。判别函数模型显示,性别二态性的判别准确率为 82.10%。该研究强调了北印度人群中耳廓形态测量的性别二态性和双侧差异,并为法医和人类学用途提供了人类耳廓的人体测量学变量数据库。