Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后被遗忘的关节评分及其与新膝关节协会评分的相关性。

Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score.

作者信息

Maniar Rajesh N, Dhiman Ankur, Maniar Parul R, Bindal Pranav, Arekar Anil

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, A-791, Bandra Reclamation, Bandra (W), Mumbai, 400050 India.

Breach Candy Hospital Trust, 60 A, Bhulabhai Desai Marg, Mumbai, 400026 India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jul 17;55(5):1175-1179. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00452-z. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is designed to asses patient recovery post Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a new dimension. It assess the ability to forget the operated joint as artificial during activities of daily living. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) is developed to encompass objective and subjective outcome as well as an assessment of patient expectation and satisfaction. Our purpose was (1) to determine FJS at 1 year post TKA in Indian Patients, and (2) to assess convergent validity between FJS and the NKSS. We hypothesised that FJS should strongly correlate with the Satisfaction (SS) and Knee perception(KPS) sub-component of NKSS.

METHODS

We enrolled 181 patients who underwent primary TKA during an 8-month duration. They were prospectively followed up at 1-year review clinic when FJS and NKSS were administered. 169 patients completed the assessment forms and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. Statistical evaluation was done with Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

Mean FJS at 1 year was 66.6 ± 25.9 with 14% ceiling and 1% floor effects. There was a mild to moderate correlation of FJS with NKSS ( < 0.001,  = 0.47) and its sub-scores ( < 0.001;  = 0.43 and  = 0.44). There was a weak correlation of FJS with NKSS sub-components of SS and KPS ( < 0.001;  = 0.37 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Mean FJS at 1 year post TKA showed convergent validity with NKSS; however, the correlation was not strong enough to use them interchangeably. Hypothesis that FJS should strongly correlate with the NKSS sub-components of satisfaction and joint perception was refuted. We conclude, FJS provides unique evaluation in recovery post TKA, different from NKSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景/目的:遗忘关节评分(FJS)旨在从一个新的维度评估全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者的恢复情况。它评估患者在日常生活活动中将手术关节视为非人工关节的能力。新膝关节协会评分(NKSS)的制定涵盖了客观和主观结果以及对患者期望和满意度的评估。我们的目的是:(1)确定印度患者TKA术后1年时的FJS;(2)评估FJS与NKSS之间的收敛效度。我们假设FJS应与NKSS的满意度(SS)和膝关节感知(KPS)子成分密切相关。

方法

我们纳入了181例在8个月期间接受初次TKA的患者。在1年复查门诊对他们进行前瞻性随访,此时进行FJS和NKSS评估。169例患者完成了评估表,13例患者失访。采用Spearman相关检验进行统计学评估。

结果

1年时的平均FJS为66.6±25.9,天花板效应为14%,地板效应为1%。FJS与NKSS(<0.001,=0.47)及其子评分(<0.001;=0.43和=0.44)存在轻度至中度相关性。FJS与NKSS的SS和KPS子成分之间存在弱相关性(<0.001;分别为=0.37和0.25)。

结论

TKA术后1年时的平均FJS与NKSS显示出收敛效度;然而,相关性不够强,不能互换使用。FJS应与NKSS的满意度和关节感知子成分密切相关的假设被推翻。我们得出结论,FJS在TKA术后恢复情况方面提供了与NKSS不同的独特评估。

证据水平

三级。

相似文献

1
Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score.
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jul 17;55(5):1175-1179. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00452-z. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
What is the Responsiveness and Respondent Burden of the New Knee Society Score?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2218-2227. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5338-1. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Short-Form New Knee Society Score: What Is Its Responsiveness and Convergent Validity with Other Scores?
J Knee Surg. 2021 Sep;34(11):1182-1188. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702190. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3346-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3970-4. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3868-1. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
7
Validation of Single-Outcome Questionnaire in Primary TKA and THA.
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Oct;37(10):1987-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
9
Joint Awareness after Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Evaluated with the Forgotten Joint Score: A Comparison Study.
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):833-839. doi: 10.1111/os.12921. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
10
Good validity and reliability of forgotten joint score-12 in total knee arthroplasty in Hindi language for Indian population.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1150-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06124-z. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Determining the Validity, Reliability, and Utility of the Forgotten Joint Score: A Systematic Review.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1137-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.058. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
4
Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3118-3127. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05776-w. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Sagittal Stability and Implant Design Affect Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):747-751. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2124-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05407-4. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Normative Values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US General Population.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):650-655. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
9
Joint Perception After Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Forgotten Joint.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.086. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.
J Orthop. 2018 Mar 27;15(2):480-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.029. eCollection 2018 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验