• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性研究及单中心经验:融合前列腺活检在初诊患者中的有效性

A Prospective Study and Single-Center Experience: Effectivity of Fusion Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients.

作者信息

Demirtaş Türev, Gur Ahmet, Golbasi Abdullah, Sönmez Gökhan, Tombul Şevket T, Demirtaş Abdullah

机构信息

History of Medicine and Ethics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, TUR.

Urology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Oct 24;13(10):e19002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19002. eCollection 2021 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.19002
PMID:34824923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8610438/
Abstract

Objective Fusion prostate biopsy (FPB) has become a popular technique in biopsy-naïve patients, though not accepted as a standard approach (yet). In this study, we aimed to present the clinical outcomes of biopsy-naïve patients who underwent FPB. Material and methods The study included 400 biopsy-naïve patients aged 45-75 years who had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 2-10 ng/ml and were detected with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) ≥3 lesion on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided FPB. A combined biopsy (CB) was performed in each patient, in which 2-4 cores were obtained for suspicious lesions by targeted biopsy (TB) and then 12-core standard prostate biopsy (SPB) was conducted in the same session. Cancer detection rates, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates, histological upgrading rates, and false negative rates were determined. Results The 400 patients had a mean age of 62.01±7.00 years and a mean PSA value of 6.84±1.87 ng/ml. Overall PCa detection rate was 50% (200/400). The csPCa detection rates for TB, SPB, and CB were 25.0%, 31.8%, and 44.0%, respectively (p<0.001). In PIRADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, CB had a csPCa detection rate of 29.2%, 54%, and 64.8%, respectively (p<0.001). The ratio of false negativity was significantly higher for TB compared to SPB (43.2% vs. 27.8%, p=0.003), whereas no significant difference was found between these two techniques with regard to upgrading rates although TB had a higher rate (19.6% vs. 13.7%, p=0.144). Conclusion FPB, a combined approach involving TB and SPB, was revealed as the most successful technique in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA<10 ng/ml due to its high cancer detection rates and low false negative rates.

摘要

目的 融合前列腺穿刺活检(FPB)在未经穿刺活检的患者中已成为一种常用技术,尽管尚未被接受为标准方法。在本研究中,我们旨在呈现接受FPB的未经穿刺活检患者的临床结果。

材料与方法 本研究纳入了400例年龄在45至75岁之间、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为2至10 ng/ml且在多参数前列腺磁共振成像(mpMRI)引导下的FPB中检测到前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)≥3级病变的未经穿刺活检患者。对每位患者进行联合活检(CB),通过靶向活检(TB)获取2至4个针对可疑病变的组织芯,然后在同一次检查中进行12芯标准前列腺穿刺活检(SPB)。确定癌症检出率、临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)检出率、组织学升级率和假阴性率。

结果 400例患者的平均年龄为62.01±7.00岁,平均PSA值为6.84±1.87 ng/ml。总体前列腺癌检出率为50%(200/400)。TB、SPB和CB的csPCa检出率分别为25.0%、31.8%和44.0%(p<0.001)。在PIRADS 3、4和5级病变中,CB的csPCa检出率分别为29.2%、54%和64.8%(p<0.001)。与SPB相比,TB的假阴性率显著更高(43.2%对27.8%,p=0.003),尽管TB的升级率更高(19.6%对13.7%,p=0.144),但这两种技术在升级率方面未发现显著差异。

结论 FPB是一种结合了TB和SPB的方法,由于其高癌症检出率和低假阴性率,在PSA<10 ng/ml的未经穿刺活检患者中被证明是最成功的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f85/8610438/ccba14727105/cureus-0013-00000019002-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f85/8610438/ccba14727105/cureus-0013-00000019002-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f85/8610438/ccba14727105/cureus-0013-00000019002-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
A Prospective Study and Single-Center Experience: Effectivity of Fusion Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients.一项前瞻性研究及单中心经验:融合前列腺活检在初诊患者中的有效性
Cureus. 2021 Oct 24;13(10):e19002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19002. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
A Comparative Study: Has MRI-guided Fusion Prostate Biopsy Changed the Prostate-specific Antigen Gray-zone Range?一项比较研究:MRI引导下的融合前列腺活检是否改变了前列腺特异性抗原灰色区域范围?
Cureus. 2019 Dec 8;11(12):e6329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6329.
3
A Single-center Experience: Does MRI-guided Target Prostate Biopsy Meet Expectations?单中心经验:磁共振成像引导下的靶向前列腺活检是否符合预期?
Cureus. 2019 Nov 14;11(11):e6160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6160.
4
Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.并非所有多参数磁共振成像靶向活检都一样:方法类型和操作者专业水平对检测临床显著前列腺癌的影响。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.多参数磁共振成像诊断途径与标准途径:在疑似前列腺癌的未经活检患者中进行的随机前瞻性研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.041. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.FUTURE 试验:一项基于磁共振成像的靶向活检技术在既往阴性前列腺穿刺活检患者中诊断前列腺癌的多中心随机对照研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy in prostate cancer detection: Are randomized clinical trials reproducible in everyday clinical practice?磁共振成像超声融合活检在前列腺癌检测中的应用:随机临床试验在日常临床实践中是否具有可重复性?
Urologia. 2019 Feb;86(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/0391560319834490.
9
Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.在初次活检的患者中,根据 PSA 水平比较 TRUS 引导下活检与 MRI 靶向活检的癌症检出率:倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e19-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.MRI/TRUS 融合引导活检与系统前列腺活检在初次活检阴性和接受主动监测的患者中的诊断性能比较。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jun;73(3):357-366. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03758-3. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向、系统和联合活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy.磁共振成像/经直肠超声融合靶向前列腺活检在未经活检的日本男性中发现更多有意义的前列腺癌,优于标准活检。
Int J Urol. 2020 Feb;27(2):140-146. doi: 10.1111/iju.14149. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
多参数磁共振成像与靶向活检联合系统活检与单纯系统活检诊断前列腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8427.
4
Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.联合磁共振成像/超声融合引导与系统活检在初次活检和既往活检患者前列腺中的应用。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jan;7(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
Step-by-Step: Fusion-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer.分步指导:融合引导前列腺活检在前列腺癌的诊断和监测中的应用。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Nov-Dec;45(6):1277-1278. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0886.
6
Comparison of the Upgrading Rates of International Society of Urological Pathology Grades and Tumor Laterality in Patients Undergoing Standard 12-Core Prostate Biopsy versus Fusion Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer.接受标准12针前列腺穿刺活检与融合前列腺穿刺活检的前列腺癌患者的国际泌尿病理学会分级升级率及肿瘤侧别比较
Urol Int. 2019;103(3):256-261. doi: 10.1159/000501528. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.靶向与系统前列腺活检在初次活检的男性中的比较:前列腺癌的图像配准前瞻性评估(PAIREDCAP)研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1734.
8
MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy in prostate cancer detection: Are randomized clinical trials reproducible in everyday clinical practice?磁共振成像超声融合活检在前列腺癌检测中的应用:随机临床试验在日常临床实践中是否具有可重复性?
Urologia. 2019 Feb;86(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/0391560319834490.
9
Multiparametric MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naive patients: Preliminary results from 80 patients.多参数磁共振成像融合引导下初诊前列腺穿刺活检:80例患者的初步结果
Turk J Urol. 2019 Feb 20;45(3):196-201. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.03710. Print 2019 May.
10
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.