Suppr超能文献

站立位时盆底功能障碍女性的盆底肌肉功能。

Pelvic floor muscle function in the standing position in women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Sep;33(9):2435-2444. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05003-6. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Clinical assessment of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) in a standing position may provide a more valid representation of PFM function experienced by patients in daily life than assessment in the lying position. The primary aim of this study was to examine PFM function in a standing versus a lying position in parous women with any type of urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

In this exploratory cross-sectional study, participant symptom status was determined using the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. Pelvic floor muscle function was assessed in standing and lying positions with a randomised order of testing. The primary outcome measure was vaginal squeeze pressure (VSP) using intra-vaginal manometry. Secondary outcomes included vaginal resting pressure, total PFM work and digital muscle testing. The difference between PFM function in a standing position compared with a lying position was analysed using paired t test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test.

RESULTS

Vaginal squeeze pressure assessed with manometry was higher in a standing than in a lying position (p = 0.001): standing (mean [SD]) 24.90 [12.67], lying 21.15 [14.65]. In contrast, PFM strength on digital muscle testing was lower in a standing position than in a lying position.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that PFM function in a standing position is different from that in a lying position in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Whether the higher VSP observed in a standing position reflects a true difference in strength between positions, or a higher pressure reading due to incorrect PFM contraction technique in a standing position is uncertain. Further research with larger cohorts and a measurement tool that can accurately distinguish a rise in intra-vaginal pressure from PFM contraction rather than increasing intra-abdominal pressure is required to confirm this difference, and the clinical significance of any difference.

摘要

简介和假设

在站立位评估盆底肌(PFMs)可能比在卧位评估更能真实反映患者日常生活中 PFMs 的功能。本研究的主要目的是检查有任何类型尿失禁和/或盆腔器官脱垂的经产妇在站立位和卧位时的 PFMs 功能。

方法

在这项探索性的横断面研究中,使用澳大利亚盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁问卷(Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire,POP-Q/UI-SF)确定参与者的症状状态。采用随机测试顺序评估站立位和卧位时的盆底肌功能。主要结局测量指标是阴道内压力测量(intra-vaginal manometry,IVM)的阴道收缩压(VSP)。次要结局指标包括阴道静息压、总 PFMs 功和数字肌肉测试。采用配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析站立位与卧位时 PFMs 功能的差异。

结果

IVM 评估的阴道收缩压在站立位高于卧位(p=0.001):站立位(平均值[标准差])24.90[12.67],卧位 21.15[14.65]。相比之下,数字肌肉测试时 PFMs 力量在站立位比卧位低。

结论

本研究表明,在患有盆底功能障碍的女性中,站立位时的 PFMs 功能与卧位不同。站立位时观察到的更高 VSP 是由于位置之间的力量差异,还是由于站立位时 PFMs 收缩技术不正确导致的更高压力读数尚不确定。需要进一步研究更大的队列,并使用可以准确区分阴道内压力升高与 PFMs 收缩而不是增加腹腔内压力的测量工具来确认这种差异,以及任何差异的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验