Suppr超能文献

人体胎儿死后全身对比增强微焦点计算机断层扫描与高磁场磁共振成像的比较。

Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):109-117. doi: 10.1002/uog.24827.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast-enhanced microfocus CT (micro-CT) and high-field magnetic resonance imaging (HF-MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla) have both been suggested as non-invasive alternatives to conventional fetal autopsy for fetuses < 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to compare these two modalities in postmortem whole-body fetal imaging.

METHODS

In this study, the imaging process and quality of micro-CT and HF-MRI were compared using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative evaluation, fetal anatomy experts scored 56 HF-MRI and 56 micro-CT images of four human fetuses aged 13-18 gestational weeks on two components: overall image quality and the ability to recognize and assess 21 anatomical structures. For the quantitative evaluation, participants segmented manually three organs with increasing complexity to assess interobserver variability. In addition, the signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios of five major organs were determined.

RESULTS

Both imaging techniques were able to reach submillimeter voxel size. The highest resolution of micro-CT was 22 µm (isotropic), while the highest resolution of HF-MRI was 137 µm (isotropic). The qualitative image assessment form was sent to 45 fetal anatomy experts, of whom 36 (80%) responded. It was observed that micro-CT scored higher on all components of the qualitative assessment compared with HF-MRI. In addition, the quantitative assessment showed that micro-CT had lower interobserver variability and higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that micro-CT outperforms HF-MRI in postmortem whole-body fetal imaging in terms of both quantitative and qualitative outcomes. Combined, these findings suggest that the ability to extract diagnostic information is greater when assessing micro-CT compared with HF-MRI images. We, therefore, believe that micro-CT is the preferred imaging modality as an alternative to conventional fetal autopsy for early gestation and is an indispensable tool in postmortem imaging services. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

尽管胎儿尸检通常被推荐用于确认或反驳产前诊断,但由于其有创性,家长对该程序的接受度已随时间下降。对比增强微焦点 CT(micro-CT)和高磁场磁共振成像(HF-MRI,≥3 特斯拉)都被认为是 20 周妊娠以下胎儿常规胎儿尸检的非侵入性替代方法。本研究旨在比较这两种方法在胎儿死后全身成像中的应用。

方法

在这项研究中,使用定性和定量评估比较了 micro-CT 和 HF-MRI 的成像过程和质量。在定性评估中,四位 13-18 孕周的人类胎儿的 56 例 HF-MRI 和 56 例 micro-CT 图像由 56 位胎儿解剖学专家进行评分,评分包括两个部分:整体图像质量和识别和评估 21 个解剖结构的能力。在定量评估中,参与者手动分割三个具有递增复杂性的器官,以评估观察者间的变异性。此外,还确定了五个主要器官的信噪比和对比噪声比。

结果

两种成像技术均能达到亚毫米体素大小。micro-CT 的最高分辨率为 22μm(各向同性),而 HF-MRI 的最高分辨率为 137μm(各向同性)。定性图像评估表发送给了 45 位胎儿解剖学专家,其中 36 位(80%)做出了回复。结果表明,micro-CT 在定性评估的所有部分的评分均高于 HF-MRI。此外,定量评估显示 micro-CT 的观察者间变异性较低,信噪比和对比噪声比较高。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,micro-CT 在死后全身胎儿成像的定量和定性结果方面均优于 HF-MRI。综合来看,在评估 micro-CT 与 HF-MRI 图像时,提取诊断信息的能力更强。因此,我们认为 micro-CT 是常规胎儿尸检的替代方法,适用于早孕期,是死后成像服务中不可或缺的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ba3/9328149/6345660a1fae/UOG-60-109-g008.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验