Finnish Environment Institute, Jyväskylä/Helsinki/Oulu, Finland.
Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Jan;41(1):108-121. doi: 10.1002/etc.5248.
Gypsum (CaSO ∙2H O) amendment is a promising way of decreasing the phosphorus loading of arable lands, and thus preventing aquatic eutrophication. However, in freshwaters with low sulfate concentrations, gypsum-released sulfate may pose a threat to the biota. To assess such risks, we performed a series of sulfate toxicity tests in the laboratory and conducted field surveys. These field surveys were associated with a large-scale pilot exercise involving spreading gypsum on agricultural fields covering 18% of the Savijoki River (Finland) catchment area. The gypsum amendment in such fields resulted in approximately a four-fold increase in the mean sulfate concentration for a 2-month period, and a transient, early peak reaching approximately 220 mg/L. The sulfate concentration gradually decreased almost to the pregypsum level after 3 years. Laboratory experiments with Unio crassus mussels and gypsum-spiked river water showed significant effects on foot movement activity, which was more intense with the highest sulfate concentration (1100 mg/L) than with the control. Survival of the glochidia after 24 and 48 h of exposure was not significantly affected by sulfate concentrations up to 1000 mg/L, nor was the length growth of the moss Fontinalis antipyretica affected. The field studies on benthic algal biomass accrual, mussel and fish density, and Salmo trutta embryo survival did not show gypsum amendment effects. Gypsum treatment did not raise the sulfate concentrations even to a level just close to critical for the biota studied. However, because the effects of sulfate are dependent on both the spatial and the temporal contexts, we advocate water quality and biota monitoring with proper temporal and spatial control in rivers within gypsum treatment areas. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:108-121. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
石膏(CaSO₄·2H₂O)的添加是减少耕地磷负荷从而防止水生富营养化的一种很有前景的方法。然而,在硫酸盐浓度较低的淡水中,石膏释放的硫酸盐可能会对生物区系构成威胁。为了评估这种风险,我们在实验室进行了一系列硫酸盐毒性测试,并进行了野外调查。这些野外调查与一项大规模的试点工作有关,该工作涉及在萨维乔基河(芬兰)集水区的 18%的农业用地上撒石膏。这些田地的石膏改良导致在两个月的时间内平均硫酸盐浓度增加了大约四倍,并在早期出现了一个短暂的峰值,达到了大约 220 mg/L。经过 3 年,硫酸盐浓度逐渐下降到接近施石膏前的水平。用厚壳贻贝和添加石膏的河水进行的实验室实验表明,对足部运动活动有显著影响,最高硫酸盐浓度(1100 mg/L)的影响比对照更强烈。在暴露 24 和 48 小时后,豆娘幼虫的存活率没有受到高达 1000 mg/L 的硫酸盐浓度的显著影响,苔藓 Fontinalis antipyretica 的生长长度也没有受到影响。对底栖藻类生物量积累、贻贝和鱼类密度以及鲑鱼胚胎存活率的野外研究没有显示出石膏改良的效果。石膏处理甚至没有将硫酸盐浓度提高到研究生物区系接近临界水平的水平。然而,由于硫酸盐的影响取决于空间和时间背景,我们主张在石膏处理区的河流中进行适当的时空控制的水质和生物区系监测。环境毒理化学 2022;41:108-121。版权所有 2021 年作者。环境毒理化学由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表 SETAC 出版。