Suppr超能文献

C1风险三联征患者行侧块螺钉置入术的可行性:经弓技术评估

Feasibility of lateral mass screw insertion in patients with the risky triad of C1: evaluation of the over-the-arch technique.

作者信息

Lee Hyung Rae, Lee Dong-Ho, Cho Jae Hwan, Hwang Eui Seung, Seok Sang Yun, Park Sehan, Lee Choon Sung

机构信息

1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Uijeongbusi, Republic of Korea.

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):822-829. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21695. Print 2022 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and complications of the over-the-arch (OTA) technique for screw insertion into the C1 lateral mass in patients in whom conventional techniques (i.e., posterior arch [PA] and inferior lateral mass [ILM]) are not feasible due to 1) PA with a very small height (< 3.5 mm), 2) a caudally tilted PA blocking the inferior part of the C1 lateral mass, or 3) loss of height at the ILM (< 3.5 mm).

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records of 60 patients who underwent C1 screw fixation with the OTA technique (13 screws) and the PA/ILM technique (107 screws) between 2011 and 2019. Vertebral artery (VA) injuries, screw malposition, and bony union were radiologically assessed. Clinical outcome measures, including Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and occipital neuralgia, were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirteen OTA screws were successfully inserted without any major complications. NDI and JOA scale scores did not show significant differences between the two groups at final follow-up. No VA injuries were recognized during screw insertion. There was no evidence of ischemic damage to the VA or bony erosion in the occiput or atlas. Medial wall violation was observed in 1 screw (7.7%); however, no C0-1, C1-2, or lateral wall violations were observed. No patients developed new-onset neuralgia postoperatively after C1 fixation with the OTA technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The OTA technique was safe and useful for C1 screw fixation in patients in whom conventional techniques could not be employed.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在因以下情况导致传统技术(即后弓[PA]和下外侧块[ILM])不可行的患者中,采用经弓根(OTA)技术向C1侧块拧入螺钉的可行性及并发症:1)后弓高度非常小(<3.5mm);2)后弓尾侧倾斜阻挡C1侧块下部;或3)下外侧块高度丢失(<3.5mm)。

方法

作者回顾了2011年至2019年间60例行C1螺钉固定术患者的病历,其中13例采用OTA技术,107例采用PA/ILM技术。通过影像学评估椎动脉(VA)损伤、螺钉位置不当及骨愈合情况。记录临床结局指标,包括颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分及枕神经痛情况。

结果

成功拧入13枚OTA螺钉,无任何严重并发症。末次随访时两组的NDI和JOA评分无显著差异。拧入螺钉过程中未发现椎动脉损伤。没有证据表明椎动脉有缺血性损伤或枕骨或寰椎有骨质侵蚀。观察到1枚螺钉(7.7%)有内侧壁侵犯;然而,未观察到C0-1、C1-2或侧壁侵犯。采用OTA技术行C1固定术后,无患者出现新发神经痛。

结论

对于无法采用传统技术的患者,OTA技术用于C1螺钉固定是安全且有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验