Suppr超能文献

泛耐药菌抗菌联合治疗方案的系统评价

Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Combination Options for Pandrug-Resistant .

作者信息

Karakonstantis Stamatis, Ioannou Petros, Samonis George, Kofteridis Diamantis P

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 3;10(11):1344. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111344.

Abstract

Antimicrobial combinations are at the moment the only potential treatment option for pandrug-resistant . A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for studies reporting the activity of antimicrobial combinations against resistant to all components of the combination. The clinical relevance of synergistic combinations was assessed based on concentrations achieving synergy and PK/PD models. Eighty-four studies were retrieved including 818 eligible isolates. A variety of combinations ( = 141 double, = 9 triple) were tested, with a variety of methods. Polymyxin-based combinations were the most studied, either as double or triple combinations with cell-wall acting agents (including sulbactam, carbapenems, glycopeptides), rifamycins and fosfomycin. Non-polymyxin combinations were predominantly based on rifampicin, fosfomycin, sulbactam and avibactam. Several combinations were synergistic at clinically relevant concentrations, while triple combinations appeared more active than the double ones. However, no combination was consistently synergistic against all strains tested. Notably, several studies reported synergy but at concentrations unlikely to be clinically relevant, or the concentration that synergy was observed was unclear. Selecting the most appropriate combinations is likely strain-specific and should be guided by in vitro synergy evaluation. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of such combinations.

摘要

抗菌药物联合目前是泛耐药菌唯一可能的治疗选择。在PubMed和Scopus数据库中进行了一项系统评价,以检索报告抗菌药物联合对联合用药所有成分均耐药菌株活性的研究。基于实现协同作用的浓度和药代动力学/药效学模型评估协同联合用药的临床相关性。共检索到84项研究,包括818株合格分离株。采用多种方法测试了多种联合用药方案(141种双联方案,9种三联方案)。基于多粘菌素的联合用药研究最多,它与作用于细胞壁的药物(包括舒巴坦、碳青霉烯类、糖肽类)、利福霉素和磷霉素组成双联或三联联合用药方案。非多粘菌素联合用药主要基于利福平、磷霉素、舒巴坦和阿维巴坦。几种联合用药方案在临床相关浓度下具有协同作用,三联联合用药方案似乎比双联方案更具活性。然而,没有一种联合用药方案对所有测试菌株都始终具有协同作用。值得注意的是,几项研究报告了协同作用,但浓度不太可能具有临床相关性,或者观察到协同作用的浓度不明确。选择最合适的联合用药方案可能因菌株而异,应以体外协同作用评估为指导。此外,迫切需要开展关于此类联合用药方案疗效和安全性的临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e895/8615225/8addb9bdf510/antibiotics-10-01344-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验